Anonymous wrote:But they're not.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would not assume that Capital is "locked down" now, and only available to the BLC pipeline. For one, there certainly aren't 44 Capital-caliber players for each grade level in the BLC system.
I could see a good but not great player at BLC, who has been in the Academy and spending money, getting a nod over a non-Academy player of equal athleticism and skill who attends tryouts. That might affect the bottom half of the Blue roster and a portion of the Orange roster.
I would offer that for the top 10-12 Blue players, Capital is going to pick the best talent that shows up at tryouts. That's how they compete with the top clubs, sustain their reputation, recruiting success, etc. No way they are going to accept and outsource a BLC tryout process at the 6th grade level or earlier as dispositive for a Capital high school team. Capital leadership's "confidence" in their ability to identify talent is very high, as uneven as it may be in actuality. I'm guessing they will maintain their lucrative middle school clinic series, which also serves as an opportunity to spot talent, in addition to the Academy.
For filling out the rest of the Orange team, they will also need talent from additional clubs.
Why would anyone take an orange position after feeling like they deserved a spot on blue? That would be some difficult emotions to work through for a year.
Orange is obsolete after roster caps. Don’t do it.
Interesting take. Hadn’t thought of that. Roster cap impacts could be real in college.
Anonymous wrote:Best thing you can do is tell your DD to suck it up buttercup and not play into the woe is me.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SW is a big reason the younger teams are struggling and people are leaving.
Preach
100
+1
She’s why we jumped ship! In hindsite, my dd wishes she had tried out for BLC bc now she feels like Capital is essentially locked down for the ‘30s and ‘31s
She has 9? months to create a gap between herself and others.
9 months to do 10% (or 25?) more than she'd normally do on reps, focus each day.
9 months to make incremental gains in the weight room that stack up like Jenga blocks.
9 months to watch and then train/try to emulate both the fundamentals and useful experimentation that she can easily witness daily nowadays on her phone.
Buy a calendar, stick it on her bedroom wall, and circle the presumed date and have her number the countdown every day.
If she's a focused athlete, she'll do some or all of the above on suggestion. Not by nagging, either, not your job. Or you can play into and validate the self-victimization. Your call.
But they're not.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would not assume that Capital is "locked down" now, and only available to the BLC pipeline. For one, there certainly aren't 44 Capital-caliber players for each grade level in the BLC system.
I could see a good but not great player at BLC, who has been in the Academy and spending money, getting a nod over a non-Academy player of equal athleticism and skill who attends tryouts. That might affect the bottom half of the Blue roster and a portion of the Orange roster.
I would offer that for the top 10-12 Blue players, Capital is going to pick the best talent that shows up at tryouts. That's how they compete with the top clubs, sustain their reputation, recruiting success, etc. No way they are going to accept and outsource a BLC tryout process at the 6th grade level or earlier as dispositive for a Capital high school team. Capital leadership's "confidence" in their ability to identify talent is very high, as uneven as it may be in actuality. I'm guessing they will maintain their lucrative middle school clinic series, which also serves as an opportunity to spot talent, in addition to the Academy.
For filling out the rest of the Orange team, they will also need talent from additional clubs.
Why would anyone take an orange position after feeling like they deserved a spot on blue? That would be some difficult emotions to work through for a year.
Orange is obsolete after roster caps. Don’t do it.
Interesting take. Hadn’t thought of that. Roster cap impacts could be real in college.
Anonymous wrote:In the 2030 class some of the best local players have already gone to hero’s, M&D, or other teams that go through high school. Capital won’t have the best local girls at tryouts this spring.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would not assume that Capital is "locked down" now, and only available to the BLC pipeline. For one, there certainly aren't 44 Capital-caliber players for each grade level in the BLC system.
I could see a good but not great player at BLC, who has been in the Academy and spending money, getting a nod over a non-Academy player of equal athleticism and skill who attends tryouts. That might affect the bottom half of the Blue roster and a portion of the Orange roster.
I would offer that for the top 10-12 Blue players, Capital is going to pick the best talent that shows up at tryouts. That's how they compete with the top clubs, sustain their reputation, recruiting success, etc. No way they are going to accept and outsource a BLC tryout process at the 6th grade level or earlier as dispositive for a Capital high school team. Capital leadership's "confidence" in their ability to identify talent is very high, as uneven as it may be in actuality. I'm guessing they will maintain their lucrative middle school clinic series, which also serves as an opportunity to spot talent, in addition to the Academy.
For filling out the rest of the Orange team, they will also need talent from additional clubs.
Why would anyone take an orange position after feeling like they deserved a spot on blue? That would be some difficult emotions to work through for a year.
Orange is obsolete after roster caps. Don’t do it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would not assume that Capital is "locked down" now, and only available to the BLC pipeline. For one, there certainly aren't 44 Capital-caliber players for each grade level in the BLC system.
I could see a good but not great player at BLC, who has been in the Academy and spending money, getting a nod over a non-Academy player of equal athleticism and skill who attends tryouts. That might affect the bottom half of the Blue roster and a portion of the Orange roster.
I would offer that for the top 10-12 Blue players, Capital is going to pick the best talent that shows up at tryouts. That's how they compete with the top clubs, sustain their reputation, recruiting success, etc. No way they are going to accept and outsource a BLC tryout process at the 6th grade level or earlier as dispositive for a Capital high school team. Capital leadership's "confidence" in their ability to identify talent is very high, as uneven as it may be in actuality. I'm guessing they will maintain their lucrative middle school clinic series, which also serves as an opportunity to spot talent, in addition to the Academy.
For filling out the rest of the Orange team, they will also need talent from additional clubs.
Why would anyone take an orange position after feeling like they deserved a spot on blue? That would be some difficult emotions to work through for a year.
There also were a small minority of teams from P4 conferences that were over 38 before the cap. Not sure about the opt ins as I don't know all who did.Anonymous wrote:Such a dumb, uninformed take. There are hundreds of DI, DII, and DIII programs if players want to play in college. It’s not just about the top 20 DI schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would not assume that Capital is "locked down" now, and only available to the BLC pipeline. For one, there certainly aren't 44 Capital-caliber players for each grade level in the BLC system.
I could see a good but not great player at BLC, who has been in the Academy and spending money, getting a nod over a non-Academy player of equal athleticism and skill who attends tryouts. That might affect the bottom half of the Blue roster and a portion of the Orange roster.
I would offer that for the top 10-12 Blue players, Capital is going to pick the best talent that shows up at tryouts. That's how they compete with the top clubs, sustain their reputation, recruiting success, etc. No way they are going to accept and outsource a BLC tryout process at the 6th grade level or earlier as dispositive for a Capital high school team. Capital leadership's "confidence" in their ability to identify talent is very high, as uneven as it may be in actuality. I'm guessing they will maintain their lucrative middle school clinic series, which also serves as an opportunity to spot talent, in addition to the Academy.
For filling out the rest of the Orange team, they will also need talent from additional clubs.
Why would anyone take an orange position after feeling like they deserved a spot on blue? That would be some difficult emotions to work through for a year.
Best thing you can do is tell your DD to suck it up buttercup and not play into the woe is me.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SW is a big reason the younger teams are struggling and people are leaving.
Preach
100
+1
She’s why we jumped ship! In hindsite, my dd wishes she had tried out for BLC bc now she feels like Capital is essentially locked down for the ‘30s and ‘31s
Anonymous wrote:I would not assume that Capital is "locked down" now, and only available to the BLC pipeline. For one, there certainly aren't 44 Capital-caliber players for each grade level in the BLC system.
I could see a good but not great player at BLC, who has been in the Academy and spending money, getting a nod over a non-Academy player of equal athleticism and skill who attends tryouts. That might affect the bottom half of the Blue roster and a portion of the Orange roster.
I would offer that for the top 10-12 Blue players, Capital is going to pick the best talent that shows up at tryouts. That's how they compete with the top clubs, sustain their reputation, recruiting success, etc. No way they are going to accept and outsource a BLC tryout process at the 6th grade level or earlier as dispositive for a Capital high school team. Capital leadership's "confidence" in their ability to identify talent is very high, as uneven as it may be in actuality. I'm guessing they will maintain their lucrative middle school clinic series, which also serves as an opportunity to spot talent, in addition to the Academy.
For filling out the rest of the Orange team, they will also need talent from additional clubs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SW is a big reason the younger teams are struggling and people are leaving.
Preach
100
+1
She’s why we jumped ship! In hindsite, my dd wishes she had tried out for BLC bc now she feels like Capital is essentially locked down for the ‘30s and ‘31s