Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder why everyone on the left is so upset about President Trump‘s expansion of the White House that is being 100% funded by donations, but have zero interest in the $1.6 billion expansion of Gavin Newsom‘s California Capitol that is 100% taxpayer funded and 100% cloaked in NDA’s and cronyism
Where is the evidence the ballroom is funded by donations? We should be able to look at treasury accounts and see where the money is collected and spent. In which account has this $200 million been deposited?
Anonymous wrote:Can those private individuals donate to Argentina instead so my tax dollars aren’t spent on them?
Anonymous wrote:Is the historical commission suing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's so funny - and typical - that none of you acknowledge this is being built using private funds. It will also benefit all the presidents to come. Not taxpayer funded at all. Idiots.
"Leavitt characterized the new construction — which she said will be funded by Trump and other private donors"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/construction-on-trump-s-200-million-white-house-ballroom-to-begin-in-september/ar-AA1JFKsY?ocid=BingNewsSerp
The titans of tech are largely funding the ballroom. Trump hosted them for lunch a few days ago. It should be noted that these same titans of tech, according to Bloomberg, are planning large monuments to themselves in the Bay Area. One tech billionaire is planning to rebuild the ancient wonder The Colossus of Rhodes, sheathed in gold, on an island in the San Francisco Bay, but with his face plopped on.
Why can't these silicon valley billionaires fund public libraries, public school buildings, and museums to build up communities like the Carnegies and the other titans of industry from the distant past?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's so funny - and typical - that none of you acknowledge this is being built using private funds. It will also benefit all the presidents to come. Not taxpayer funded at all. Idiots.
"Leavitt characterized the new construction — which she said will be funded by Trump and other private donors"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/construction-on-trump-s-200-million-white-house-ballroom-to-begin-in-september/ar-AA1JFKsY?ocid=BingNewsSerp
The titans of tech are largely funding the ballroom. Trump hosted them for lunch a few days ago. It should be noted that these same titans of tech, according to Bloomberg, are planning large monuments to themselves in the Bay Area. One tech billionaire is planning to rebuild the ancient wonder The Colossus of Rhodes, sheathed in gold, on an island in the San Francisco Bay, but with his face plopped on.
Why can't these silicon valley billionaires fund public libraries, public school buildings, and museums to build up communities like the Carnegies and the other titans of industry from the distant past?
Anonymous wrote:It's so funny - and typical - that none of you acknowledge this is being built using private funds. It will also benefit all the presidents to come. Not taxpayer funded at all. Idiots.
"Leavitt characterized the new construction — which she said will be funded by Trump and other private donors"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/construction-on-trump-s-200-million-white-house-ballroom-to-begin-in-september/ar-AA1JFKsY?ocid=BingNewsSerp
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For reference, an NFL football field is the same size. wtf.
I thought we needed to save money?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/07/31/trump-ballroom-east-wing-overhaul/
The next Democrat president should tear this monstrosity down as well as the trump patio and restore both the East Wing and the Jackie Rose garden
The WH should also be fumigated to get rid of the trump stench.