Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I truly do not know what to think. No one hypothesis works. Even getting sick over the side and falling seems far-fetched. Why would you climb up on a table as opposed to just going to the bathroom?
We don’t know which stateroom the Bradleys occupied, but some balconies on Rhapsody are angled like this:
![]()
Is it possible she didn’t want to puke ON the railing, so she attempted to lean over even further?
Look at the ledge that juts out on the other side of the glass. No way there wouldn't have been evidence if she had vomited there. Especially given the dynamics of a moving boat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I truly do not know what to think. No one hypothesis works. Even getting sick over the side and falling seems far-fetched. Why would you climb up on a table as opposed to just going to the bathroom?
We don’t know which stateroom the Bradleys occupied, but some balconies on Rhapsody are angled like this:
![]()
Is it possible she didn’t want to puke ON the railing, so she attempted to lean over even further?
Anonymous wrote:I truly do not know what to think. No one hypothesis works. Even getting sick over the side and falling seems far-fetched. Why would you climb up on a table as opposed to just going to the bathroom?
Anonymous wrote:Finally finished the documentary. I think the theory she fell is the most likely. The shoes on the balcony and the table pushed up to the railing are the two biggest indicators to me. She probably packed 3 pairs of shoes at most (slip on sandals, a pair of sneakers, and something dressy for formal night) so it seemed odd not to point out that any of her shoes were missing from the room. As for the table, sure the cleaning crew had been through, but they usually clean around furniture. If they’d moved the table, it would have been to the standard balcony configuration, not pressed against the railing.
Now, to pull the thread on the theory she was trafficked, it was established that the ship was only logging key swipes via room entry. There was no reference to key swipes to get off or on the boat. Amy could have easily walked off the ship. Maybe Yellow gave her a contact for buying drugs and she thought it would be a quick transaction and she’d be back at the port before anyone noticed she was missing. This would be in line with the seaman’s account. It’s possible.
As for the website hits, I think there are additional angles they were missing. One, the family has been scammed by false claims of finding Amy in the past. There’s more detail on the Wikipedia page for her case. The hits could easily be people researching Amy to build a con. Or, it could be “the children” who would presumably be teens-young adults at this point. I very much doubt Amy would still be alive if she was trafficked nearly 30 years ago.
Last thing, the mother’s glee at the idea Amy might have had children was really troubling. I think the family has a real disconnect with the horrors of being abducted and forced into prostitution. They hope she’s alive, I get it, but if she is/was it would have be in horrific conditions.
Anonymous wrote:Finally finished the documentary. I think the theory she fell is the most likely. The shoes on the balcony and the table pushed up to the railing are the two biggest indicators to me. She probably packed 3 pairs of shoes at most (slip on sandals, a pair of sneakers, and something dressy for formal night) so it seemed odd not to point out that any of her shoes were missing from the room. As for the table, sure the cleaning crew had been through, but they usually clean around furniture. If they’d moved the table, it would have been to the standard balcony configuration, not pressed against the railing.
Now, to pull the thread on the theory she was trafficked, it was established that the ship was only logging key swipes via room entry. There was no reference to key swipes to get off or on the boat. Amy could have easily walked off the ship. Maybe Yellow gave her a contact for buying drugs and she thought it would be a quick transaction and she’d be back at the port before anyone noticed she was missing. This would be in line with the seaman’s account. It’s possible.
As for the website hits, I think there are additional angles they were missing. One, the family has been scammed by false claims of finding Amy in the past. There’s more detail on the Wikipedia page for her case. The hits could easily be people researching Amy to build a con. Or, it could be “the children” who would presumably be teens-young adults at this point. I very much doubt Amy would still be alive if she was trafficked nearly 30 years ago.
Last thing, the mother’s glee at the idea Amy might have had children was really troubling. I think the family has a real disconnect with the horrors of being abducted and forced into prostitution. They hope she’s alive, I get it, but if she is/was it would have be in horrific conditions.
Anonymous wrote:This whole situation is much more glamorous than "she fell overboard"
The mom got a full makeover for the show, courtesy Netflix i'm sure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know why people are making such a big deal about shoes. She may have had another pair right by her bed or the door and grabbed those instead. Maybe flip flops.
And why are people simply disregarding the eyewitness sighting close to 6am?
All of her shoes were accounted for.
No, they weren't. The family said they had no idea how many shoes she brought. They knew she had tennis shoes, the Birks, and a dressier pair, but weren't sure what else.
How many pairs of shoes do you think Young, not wealthy (non lipstick) lesbian brought on her trip in the tiny cabin with her parents? Come on.
And don’t they still have her packed luggage? I’m sure from that they can deduce which shoes were/were not missing. it wouldn’t take much to account for casual shoes she brought with her and assume she didn’t walk out of the room in heels. The parents seem odd to me and I agree they seem like they created an image of Amy in their heads that wasn’t real. Poor woman. She probably felt rejected by her family. Still I think this was accidental rather than suicide.
I feel that her parents are the type that, if they point out how pretty she looks in dresses (since they weren’t her style) or how much men paid her attention, she’s suddenly decide she wasn’t gay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know why people are making such a big deal about shoes. She may have had another pair right by her bed or the door and grabbed those instead. Maybe flip flops.
And why are people simply disregarding the eyewitness sighting close to 6am?
All of her shoes were accounted for.
No, they weren't. The family said they had no idea how many shoes she brought. They knew she had tennis shoes, the Birks, and a dressier pair, but weren't sure what else.
How many pairs of shoes do you think Young, not wealthy (non lipstick) lesbian brought on her trip in the tiny cabin with her parents? Come on.
And don’t they still have her packed luggage? I’m sure from that they can deduce which shoes were/were not missing. it wouldn’t take much to account for casual shoes she brought with her and assume she didn’t walk out of the room in heels. The parents seem odd to me and I agree they seem like they created an image of Amy in their heads that wasn’t real. Poor woman. She probably felt rejected by her family. Still I think this was accidental rather than suicide.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know why people are making such a big deal about shoes. She may have had another pair right by her bed or the door and grabbed those instead. Maybe flip flops.
And why are people simply disregarding the eyewitness sighting close to 6am?
All of her shoes were accounted for.
No, they weren't. The family said they had no idea how many shoes she brought. They knew she had tennis shoes, the Birks, and a dressier pair, but weren't sure what else.
How many pairs of shoes do you think Young, not wealthy (non lipstick) lesbian brought on her trip in the tiny cabin with her parents? Come on.