Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:how'd the teams look last nite? good, bad, ugly?
Battlefield beat Riverside by 1. This was a tale of two different games. The first half’s was dominated by Battlefield. They controlled the draws and were aggressive going to goal. Then in the second half Riverside stepped up pressure on the defensive side of the ball and Battlefield struggled to score
Ups and downs in both sides
Riverside has an aggressive defense that can cause many turnovers. However, they are wild with their sticks ABs can become a little too aggressive as they racked up five yellow cards
Battlefield has a lot of weapons with their starters and controlled the draws (which surprises me with three sophomores on the circle). However, they have no depth at all. I counted a backup goalie and three field players. One injury to their main starters will cripple them
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who really has depth? Think that is going to be a common theme this year.
I think the teams with the best JV programs probably have the most depth. So that is most likely Madison, Yorktown, maybe McLean and Oakton? Teams that rely on building the team at the varsity level each year are the ones with no depth. That is unfortunately more of the norm these days.
Anonymous wrote:Who really has depth? Think that is going to be a common theme this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:how'd the teams look last nite? good, bad, ugly?
Battlefield beat Riverside by 1. This was a tale of two different games. The first half’s was dominated by Battlefield. They controlled the draws and were aggressive going to goal. Then in the second half Riverside stepped up pressure on the defensive side of the ball and Battlefield struggled to score
Ups and downs in both sides
Riverside has an aggressive defense that can cause many turnovers. However, they are wild with their sticks ABs can become a little too aggressive as they racked up five yellow cards
Battlefield has a lot of weapons with their starters and controlled the draws (which surprises me with three sophomores on the circle). However, they have no depth at all. I counted a backup goalie and three field players. One injury to their main starters will cripple them
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:how'd the teams look last nite? good, bad, ugly?
Battlefield beat Riverside by 1. This was a tale of two different games. The first half’s was dominated by Battlefield. They controlled the draws and were aggressive going to goal. Then in the second half Riverside stepped up pressure on the defensive side of the ball and Battlefield struggled to score
Ups and downs in both sides
Riverside has an aggressive defense that can cause many turnovers. However, they are wild with their sticks ABs can become a little too aggressive as they racked up five yellow cards
Battlefield has a lot of weapons with their starters and controlled the draws (which surprises me with three sophomores on the circle). However, they have no depth at all. I counted a backup goalie and three field players. One injury to their main starters will cripple them
Anonymous wrote:how'd the teams look last nite? good, bad, ugly?
Anonymous wrote:how'd the teams look last nite? good, bad, ugly?
Anonymous wrote:Looks like a TOOL is missing from the shed.