Anonymous wrote:This is an odd thread, relentless and mostly false dumping on DCE. I have three sons and I have spent substantial time and a ton of money in all three programs (DCE, ML, NL) so I am in good position to compare them. All three are good programs, and all three will get your son recruited to college, but all three have warts on them too. Portraying DCE as somehow worse than the other two is nonsense.
I don't know the 2030 DCE team, and I will take your word that the players are weak.
But trust me, they will pull even with the other two within the next 1-2 years based purely on numbers. there are only three programs in the DMV that you can trust to get your son recruited, which means only around 60 players total getting meaningful play time on the A level team. When somebody is not happy with their play time (or gets bumped when their team brings out of town players), they will move to one of the other two. The revolving door among DCE, ML, and NL means that all three will have solid rosters by 10th grade when it counts.
Please ignore the nonsense on this thread!
Well said, and I am right there with you. Have 2 boys playing D1 (Ivy and Big10). Nothing matters til 9th grade, at the earliest and all 3 clubs can help get you recruited and do it at about the same rate. All 3 clubs have also taken their turn as either being the best or worst team in any given year, so nobody has it locked down as the top club in the area. They're all the same...over priced, avg experience for both kid and parent, and selfish lacrosse; but the most efficient way to get your son evaluated by college coaches, so tough beans.
Find a goalie and a fogo you can count on and are recruitable and that is how you make the decision of where to play, assuming you are good enough to get top level playing time.