Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Apparently the Dad lied more than I realized. According to those who have read the entire police report, he initially told police he was sitting outside feeding the baby and "lost sight" of the 3 yo for "a couple minutes." Turns out he was never outside at all. Didn't he know he had surveillance footage? Lying shows consciousness of guilt.
The poor baby was alone for 9 minutes. He's an awful awful person. It looks like she really only wanted the pages describing the play by play of him drowning which is fair imo. This report was brutal without it.
Anonymous wrote:Apparently the Dad lied more than I realized. According to those who have read the entire police report, he initially told police he was sitting outside feeding the baby and "lost sight" of the 3 yo for "a couple minutes." Turns out he was never outside at all. Didn't he know he had surveillance footage? Lying shows consciousness of guilt.
Anonymous wrote:This video shows the backyard and pool and if you look closely you can see the "net" covering the pool that was obviously not on at the time of the incident. Our friends have a motorized retracting cover that is significantly more substantial than this that they use any time they are not directly using the pool. They do not have a fence though. Theirs is in VA, but not in the DC area.
https://www.tiktok.com/@itk.023/video/7506331034108120351
Anonymous wrote:Apparently the Dad lied more than I realized. According to those who have read the entire police report, he initially told police he was sitting outside feeding the baby and "lost sight" of the 3 yo for "a couple minutes." Turns out he was never outside at all. Didn't he know he had surveillance footage? Lying shows consciousness of guilt.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have a photo of the pool? I'm having trouble envisioning what's so great about it that a fence would ruin its aesthetics. I don't think I've ever seen a pool without a fence -- and we have some fairly wealthy friends.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have a photo of the pool? I'm having trouble envisioning what's so great about it that a fence would ruin its aesthetics. I don't think I've ever seen a pool without a fence -- and we have some fairly wealthy friends.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you read the report, they had alarms on all exterior doors but they were not turned off. They also had a katchakid netting system for the pool but both parents said they since they had been using the pool often, they hadn’t put it on between swims. The dad was feeding the baby a bottle. He had warmed it and was still feeding the baby when he ran out to the pool, he actually set the baby down outside and dove in to get the toddler. The toddler has taken swimming lessons and according to the report he was swimming for 2 minutes before going under but the area where he fell in didn’t have anywhere for him to grab or get out. He normally was very cautious around the pool (wouldn’t go in on his own) but in this case he tripped over something he was carrying and fell in.
Wasn’t the dad also placing gambling bets whilst the child was drowning in the pool?
No, the unemployed SAHD placed the bets earlier. He was locked in to the game to see if his over under hit. The player he bet on was injured, prolonging the game. As soon as the game ended (6:40) he noticed his son was facebown in the pool, dead, and called 911
Does the security footage and/or 911 call really match up with the end of the NBA game?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you read the report, they had alarms on all exterior doors but they were not turned off. They also had a katchakid netting system for the pool but both parents said they since they had been using the pool often, they hadn’t put it on between swims. The dad was feeding the baby a bottle. He had warmed it and was still feeding the baby when he ran out to the pool, he actually set the baby down outside and dove in to get the toddler. The toddler has taken swimming lessons and according to the report he was swimming for 2 minutes before going under but the area where he fell in didn’t have anywhere for him to grab or get out. He normally was very cautious around the pool (wouldn’t go in on his own) but in this case he tripped over something he was carrying and fell in.
Wasn’t the dad also placing gambling bets whilst the child was drowning in the pool?
No, the unemployed SAHD placed the bets earlier. He was locked in to the game to see if his over under hit. The player he bet on was injured, prolonging the game. As soon as the game ended (6:40) he noticed his son was facebown in the pool, dead, and called 911
Does the security footage and/or 911 call really match up with the end of the NBA game?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you read the report, they had alarms on all exterior doors but they were not turned off. They also had a katchakid netting system for the pool but both parents said they since they had been using the pool often, they hadn’t put it on between swims. The dad was feeding the baby a bottle. He had warmed it and was still feeding the baby when he ran out to the pool, he actually set the baby down outside and dove in to get the toddler. The toddler has taken swimming lessons and according to the report he was swimming for 2 minutes before going under but the area where he fell in didn’t have anywhere for him to grab or get out. He normally was very cautious around the pool (wouldn’t go in on his own) but in this case he tripped over something he was carrying and fell in.
Wasn’t the dad also placing gambling bets whilst the child was drowning in the pool?
No, the unemployed SAHD placed the bets earlier. He was locked in to the game to see if his over under hit. The player he bet on was injured, prolonging the game. As soon as the game ended (6:40) he noticed his son was facebown in the pool, dead, and called 911
Does the security footage and/or 911 call really match up with the end of the NBA game?