Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’d set up a transitional school for English language learners. You test in/out and return to your neighborhood school once fluency is achieved.
Eliminate AAP centers. Your base school will suffice.
Considering the number of ESL students in the county, that school would need to support 15-20% of the county’s students.
Setting up a separate school and running transportation sounds like a good idea but not a way to reduce expenses.
This. It will never happen for the same reason the district is trying to do away with standalone special ed programs and sheltered classes at the secondary level. Some of the students will never exit either program through no fault of anyone. The programs are expensive to staff and it’s much cheaper to push everyone into the same classroom and then blame teachers for not meeting the needs of all learners.
Even if FCPS wanted to do this, it will never happen due to federal law.
The system is created to quickly assimilate small numbers of recent, mostly educated non English speaking immigrants to US language and customs.
It is not designed to support the current situation created over the past 4 years of vast numbers of non educated, often illiterate, students from culturally dissimilar areas (some of the high immigrant schools have dozens of languages spoken, often from places that are not modern societies with modern views on women and culture, for example), in a school system that now despises assimilation or promoting an "American" culture.
The federal laws on placing ESOL students in mainstream classrooms worked under limited immigration and minimal illegal migration, when the schools used to value assimilation to US language and culture.
The laws cause massive failure under the current migration and immigration patterns, in a part of the country that teaches tgat assimilation is a bad thing to be avoided, and that America is a failed idea.
If you want to make the laws match what is needed in the schools now, you need to start with Connolly, Kaine and Warner, none of whom will support what you want and what the schools need, because what you propose is too trumpy for their political belief system. You must fix it at a federal level. FCPS hands are tied.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cut all DEI personnel and programs immediately.
So you mean to cut special education?
Did I say that? You're just making stuff up.
Anonymous wrote:The 60 full-time DEI employees under Chief Equity Officer, Nardos King, represent a relatively minor percentage of the total FCPS budget.
However, refusing to cut the do-nothing DEI department will result in FCPS losing federal funds, which will be a massive blow to FCPS.
Moreover, the FCPS students who will be hurt the most by stubbornly clinging to the DEI department will be FARMS / lower SES, and BIPOC learners.
Is FCPS really going to throw disadvantaged kids under the bus just to save Nardos King’s job??
Anonymous wrote:The 60 full-time DEI employees under Chief Equity Officer, Nardos King, represent a relatively minor percentage of the total FCPS budget.
However, refusing to cut the do-nothing DEI department will result in FCPS losing federal funds, which will be a massive blow to FCPS.
Moreover, the FCPS students who will be hurt the most by stubbornly clinging to the DEI department will be FARMS / lower SES, and BIPOC learners.
Is FCPS really going to throw disadvantaged kids under the bus just to save Nardos King’s job??
Anonymous wrote:Well, it looks like the SB is running a little Fairfax DNC at their offices. That is troubling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’d set up a transitional school for English language learners. You test in/out and return to your neighborhood school once fluency is achieved.
Eliminate AAP centers. Your base school will suffice.
Considering the number of ESL students in the county, that school would need to support 15-20% of the county’s students.
Setting up a separate school and running transportation sounds like a good idea but not a way to reduce expenses.
This. It will never happen for the same reason the district is trying to do away with standalone special ed programs and sheltered classes at the secondary level. Some of the students will never exit either program through no fault of anyone. The programs are expensive to staff and it’s much cheaper to push everyone into the same classroom and then blame teachers for not meeting the needs of all learners.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’d set up a transitional school for English language learners. You test in/out and return to your neighborhood school once fluency is achieved.
Eliminate AAP centers. Your base school will suffice.
Considering the number of ESL students in the county, that school would need to support 15-20% of the county’s students.
Setting up a separate school and running transportation sounds like a good idea but not a way to reduce expenses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’d set up a transitional school for English language learners. You test in/out and return to your neighborhood school once fluency is achieved.
Eliminate AAP centers. Your base school will suffice.
Considering the number of ESL students in the county, that school would need to support 15-20% of the county’s students.