Anonymous wrote:Democrat senators are running to the news shows pounding their chests about how they’re going to be asking Tulsi and John all about this when they appear before the Intelligence Committee tomorrow.

Tulsi needs to calm their bluff. Fill the gallery with Proud Boys armed to the teeth. Enter the room with your most vicious Republican CIA paramilitary soldiers. Then see what the Democrat senators have to say .

You think like a thug.

Anonymous wrote:And Trump says he didn’t know about it. Where are all the Trumpers who whined about Biden relying on his team too much due to his age?

When questioned all he does is trash the Atlantic magazine. WTF? Can anyone force him to answer questions?

Anonymous wrote:This is much ado about nothing. Do you seriously think Yemen could have done anything about this with the inside information?

The administration did this to intimidate Canada and Europe. There was a basketball team who used to run through their offense instead of the pregame layup line. They did it to intimidate the opponent, showing their offense because the opponent wouldn’t be able to do anything about it. That team ended up winning 85-90% of their games consistently.

That’s all this is. Democrats need to calm down, take a deep breath, and figure out how they’re going to stay out of jail.

They are using an unsecure platform to communicate top secret information. This appears to be a routine occurrence. For people who were wrapped up in the Clinton server, which ended up being a nothing burger, it seems mighty hypocritical to give this a pass.

Republican Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski said: "Think about what we would do if Biden were president and this came out... we would raise the roof", according to a reporter for Semafor, external.

Anonymous wrote:This is much ado about nothing. Do you seriously think Yemen could have done anything about this with the inside information?

The administration did this to intimidate Canada and Europe. There was a basketball team who used to run through their offense instead of the pregame layup line. They did it to intimidate the opponent, showing their offense because the opponent wouldn’t be able to do anything about it. That team ended up winning 85-90% of their games consistently.

That’s all this is. Democrats need to calm down, take a deep breath, and figure out how they’re going to stay out of jail.

I think Iran could have. And would have.

And really, the Biden Admin plans a bombing on Hillary’s unsecured serve or Hunter’s laptop and adds a Fox News reporter to the discussion by accident, and you’d say the exact same thing? You can say that with a straight face. Goldblum is right. They are lucky they got an ethical and patriotic American by accident and not someone who called Iran. That no Americans died was pure luck.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cg70xgxl3vmt

"It’s baffling. It’s shocking. It’s dangerous," says Samar Ali, a professor of politics and law at Vanderbilt University, saying that the text chain appeared to be "a clear violation of our national security laws and our archive norms".

Sensitive government communications are required to take place in a sealed-off room called a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF), Ali says.

Ali says these rooms are “virtually impossible to penetrate,” unlike the messaging app Signal.

Ali speaks from experience, recalling when she once used a SCIF to hash out negotiations between the US and EU.

One question Ali raises with me is what accountability those involved in the Signal chat might face? She notes that she would have lost her job and security clearance if she committed similar violations.

Anonymous wrote:Is it possible Waltz did this on purpose because he had a Road to Damascus moment? I simply cannot believe that this was a coincidence.

I simply can no believe you think he did this because he's ethical. Did you read his posts? He was the one pushing for the bombs to drop.

Anonymous wrote:This is much ado about nothing. Do you seriously think Yemen could have done anything about this with the inside information?

The administration did this to intimidate Canada and Europe. There was a basketball team who used to run through their offense instead of the pregame layup line. They did it to intimidate the opponent, showing their offense because the opponent wouldn’t be able to do anything about it. That team ended up winning 85-90% of their games consistently.

That’s all this is. Democrats need to calm down, take a deep breath, and figure out how they’re going to stay out of jail.

It's huge.

Anonymous wrote:This is much ado about nothing. Do you seriously think Yemen could have done anything about this with the inside information?

The administration did this to intimidate Canada and Europe. There was a basketball team who used to run through their offense instead of the pregame layup line. They did it to intimidate the opponent, showing their offense because the opponent wouldn’t be able to do anything about it. That team ended up winning 85-90% of their games consistently.

That’s all this is. Democrats need to calm down, take a deep breath, and figure out how they’re going to stay out of jail.

I seriously cannot decide if we should laugh at or cry about this post.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DUI hire must be hitting the sauce.

WhiskeyLeaks

You win the thread.

This is much ado about nothing. Do you seriously think Yemen could have done anything about this with the inside information?

The administration did this to intimidate Canada and Europe. There was a basketball team who used to run through their offense instead of the pregame layup line. They did it to intimidate the opponent, showing their offense because the opponent wouldn’t be able to do anything about it. That team ended up winning 85-90% of their games consistently.

That’s all this is. Democrats need to calm down, take a deep breath, and figure out how they’re going to stay out of jail.

Is it possible Waltz did this on purpose because he had a Road to Damascus moment? I simply cannot believe that this was a coincidence.

Anonymous wrote:Could the Trump admin actually fire someone for breaking laws and being incompetent? I would be shocked. But being the National Security Adviser and not paying attention as you add a journalist to a group chat to plan a war on Signal is pretty f***ing bad.

Waltz’s future in doubt following accidental war plan leak
“You can’t have recklessness as the national security adviser,” one official said.

By Dasha Burns, Rachael Bade and Eli Stokols

The stunning revelation that top administration officials accidentally included a reporter in a group chat discussing war plans triggered furious discussion inside the White House that national security adviser Mike Waltz may need to be forced out.

Nothing is decided yet, and White House officials cautioned that President Donald Trump would ultimately make the decision over the next day or two as he watches coverage of the embarrassing episode.

Performance review of epically dumb NSA Waltz based on what FoxNews says about the incident...we're doomed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is just the tip of the iceberg. This admin doesn’t believe in following laws on national security or ethics or conflict of interest or on sovereignty of national borders. What could possibly go wrong?

No, they don't.

Trump read the Supreme Court case as a green light, and he has green lighted everyone in his administration to be lawless. They're really upset with the courts that keep giving them losses. The Supreme Court said they could break laws with impunity! These lower courts need to get with the program!

And it's only March 2025.

His administration is stupid. The greenlight immunity is for Trump alone and does not extend to his cronies.

He plans to issue blanket pardons for everyone including himself for 2016-2024.

Anonymous wrote:Again, Democrats need to be on this like a dog with a bone. Stop being so freaking docile! Highlight the hypocrisy over and over again!

100% this. Democrats are far too polite.