Anonymous
Post 06/25/2025 15:43     Subject: Are we talking about Trump's vendetta against Covington and Perkins Coie
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Layoffs at Perkins Coie. Best of luck to those job hunting.

https://abovethelaw.com/2025/06/biglaw-firm-fighting-trump-announces-staff-layoffs/


Not sure this means much. It’s all non-lawyer staff. Biglaw has been doing layoffs of non-lawyer staff for over a decade.


Wait til AI starts leading to lawyer layoffs. It’s going to be hilarious, reading all the screeching about it here!



Fees need to be drastically reduced
AI is better, faster, free and doesn't go home, sleep or vacation
Anonymous
Post 06/25/2025 15:39     Subject: Are we talking about Trump's vendetta against Covington and Perkins Coie
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Layoffs at Perkins Coie. Best of luck to those job hunting.

https://abovethelaw.com/2025/06/biglaw-firm-fighting-trump-announces-staff-layoffs/


Maybe they can learn to code.


You're talking about secretaries. These are your people.
Anonymous
Post 06/25/2025 14:10     Subject: Are we talking about Trump's vendetta against Covington and Perkins Coie
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Layoffs at Perkins Coie. Best of luck to those job hunting.

https://abovethelaw.com/2025/06/biglaw-firm-fighting-trump-announces-staff-layoffs/


Not sure this means much. It’s all non-lawyer staff. Biglaw has been doing layoffs of non-lawyer staff for over a decade.


Wait til AI starts leading to lawyer layoffs. It’s going to be hilarious, reading all the screeching about it here!
Anonymous
Post 06/25/2025 14:09     Subject: Are we talking about Trump's vendetta against Covington and Perkins Coie
Anonymous wrote:Layoffs at Perkins Coie. Best of luck to those job hunting.

https://abovethelaw.com/2025/06/biglaw-firm-fighting-trump-announces-staff-layoffs/


Maybe they can learn to code.
Anonymous
Post 06/25/2025 14:08     Subject: Re:Are we talking about Trump's vendetta against Covington and Perkins Coie
Anonymous wrote:


That seems childish.


That person probably should not be a federal judge.
Anonymous
Post 06/25/2025 13:30     Subject: Are we talking about Trump's vendetta against Covington and Perkins Coie
+1
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2025 07:56     Subject: Are we talking about Trump's vendetta against Covington and Perkins Coie
Anonymous wrote:Layoffs at Perkins Coie. Best of luck to those job hunting.

https://abovethelaw.com/2025/06/biglaw-firm-fighting-trump-announces-staff-layoffs/


Not sure this means much. It’s all non-lawyer staff. Biglaw has been doing layoffs of non-lawyer staff for over a decade.
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2025 07:17     Subject: Are we talking about Trump's vendetta against Covington and Perkins Coie
Layoffs at Perkins Coie. Best of luck to those job hunting.

https://abovethelaw.com/2025/06/biglaw-firm-fighting-trump-announces-staff-layoffs/
Anonymous
Post 06/02/2025 12:50     Subject: Are we talking about Trump's vendetta against Covington and Perkins Coie
I’ll wager Trump has leverage over the firm or some of their clients. That’s why they caved.

I don’t think Epstein secrets went to the grave with Epstein.
Anonymous
Post 06/02/2025 12:01     Subject: Are we talking about Trump's vendetta against Covington and Perkins Coie
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You'll see. He has 4 years to abuse.


He loses every time someone bothers to fight. He does what losers do, they lose.


They will be gone in 4 years. No clients

In reality the opposite is happening.


It makes perfect sense, why on Earth would you pay a firm to fight for you when that company couldn’t even fight for itself?

Exactly. Why could they not foresee this is crazy.


Right?? What client in their right mind would believe that one of these firms would stand up to Trump if they needed them to?
Anonymous
Post 06/02/2025 09:22     Subject: Re:Are we talking about Trump's vendetta against Covington and Perkins Coie
Anonymous wrote:



So? Trump can drop 26 exclamation marks easily in one "Truth"!
Anonymous
Post 06/02/2025 09:20     Subject: Are we talking about Trump's vendetta against Covington and Perkins Coie
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Four top partners from Paul Weiss just left to open their own boutique law firm. These litigators represented Google, Uber, Oracle and more. Hoping there is more fallout from the others. Maybe all the detractors will hookup, pull their clients and make the coward law firms skittish.
https://apple.news/A0bjhNJRGT0al9PMlhaBUdQ

Yup! For those who can’t access…


3 women and 1 man. Gender-aligned BigLaw firms are the future?
Anonymous
Post 06/02/2025 07:54     Subject: Are we talking about Trump's vendetta against Covington and Perkins Coie
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You'll see. He has 4 years to abuse.


He loses every time someone bothers to fight. He does what losers do, they lose.


They will be gone in 4 years. No clients

In reality the opposite is happening.


It makes perfect sense, why on Earth would you pay a firm to fight for you when that company couldn’t even fight for itself?

Exactly. Why could they not foresee this is crazy.
Anonymous
Post 06/02/2025 06:18     Subject: Are we talking about Trump's vendetta against Covington and Perkins Coie
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You'll see. He has 4 years to abuse.


He loses every time someone bothers to fight. He does what losers do, they lose.


They will be gone in 4 years. No clients

In reality the opposite is happening.


It makes perfect sense, why on Earth would you pay a firm to fight for you when that company couldn’t even fight for itself?
Anonymous
Post 06/02/2025 00:50     Subject: Are we talking about Trump's vendetta against Covington and Perkins Coie
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You'll see. He has 4 years to abuse.


He loses every time someone bothers to fight. He does what losers do, they lose.


They will be gone in 4 years. No clients

In reality the opposite is happening.