Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Georgetown Day:
Yale, Princeton, Cornell, 2 Barnards, 2 Northwesterns, 3 Northeasterns, 3 Wesleyans, 2 BC's, 2 Skidmores, 2 Spellmans, Wellesley, Lafayette, Middlebury, Tulane, UVM, Carleton, WPI, Occidental
This time last year, GDS was doing much better. What happened?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Georgetown Day:
Yale, Princeton, Cornell, 2 Barnards, 2 Northwesterns, 3 Northeasterns, 3 Wesleyans, 2 BC's, 2 Skidmores, 2 Spellmans, Wellesley, Lafayette, Middlebury, Tulane, UVM, Carleton, WPI, Occidental
Id be livid to spend GDS money for a child destined for Wesleyan, skidmore, Spelman, Lafayette, Middlebury, especially Tulane (seriously wtf?), UVM, Carleton, and omg WPI? You could get into those schools going to an underfunded public school.
Anonymous wrote:Georgetown Day:
Yale, Princeton, Cornell, 2 Barnards, 2 Northwesterns, 3 Northeasterns, 3 Wesleyans, 2 BC's, 2 Skidmores, 2 Spellmans, Wellesley, Lafayette, Middlebury, Tulane, UVM, Carleton, WPI, Occidental
Anonymous wrote:I don't know those particular sidwell kids - ours were older, but I can say for sure that the kids who went to T20 schools from Sidwell were very smart and usually brought other skills to the table - sports, acting, singing, musical instruments, robotics, debate, model UN etc - just like any other high achieving kids from any other school.
The idea that these kids are "less than" applicants from other schools is nonsensical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Georgetown Day:
Yale, Princeton, Cornell, 2 Barnards, 2 Northwesterns, 3 Northeasterns, 3 Wesleyans, 2 BC's, 2 Skidmores, 2 Spellmans, Wellesley, Lafayette, Middlebury, Tulane, UVM, Carleton, WPI, Occidental
This time last year, GDS was doing much better. What happened?
Anonymous wrote:Georgetown Day:
Yale, Princeton, Cornell, 2 Barnards, 2 Northwesterns, 3 Northeasterns, 3 Wesleyans, 2 BC's, 2 Skidmores, 2 Spellmans, Wellesley, Lafayette, Middlebury, Tulane, UVM, Carleton, WPI, Occidental
Anonymous wrote:Georgetown Day:
Yale, Princeton, Cornell, 2 Barnards, 2 Northwesterns, 3 Northeasterns, 3 Wesleyans, 2 BC's, 2 Skidmores, 2 Spellmans, Wellesley, Lafayette, Middlebury, Tulane, UVM, Carleton, WPI, Occidental
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How are RM and Blair magnets doing?
Their commitment websites are relatively quiet. DD is at RM and says a number aren't posting for some reason. She knows 3 Hopkins and 1 Amherst ED acceptance who haven't posted and said EA kids might still be applying RD elsewhere to see how things pan out. Also, a significant number of magnet kids end up at the UMD Honors College and/or get Banneker Key and go that route because of cost. They won't have heard yet.
Thank you.
3 JHU already is impressive. It's a small program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh my God - I just clicked on one randomly (sidwell) and the mystery of why so many of our 4.6, 1600 Sat kids are not getting into elite schools comes into pretty clear focus. The obvious bias that every kid there is headed to a top five school is actually sickening. Stunning. Seems they waltz right in if the parents had the money and location to attend this schools. So much for a meritocracy.
Haha, are you saying you can take one look at their blond/brown hair and privileged bro vibe and *know* they’re not as smart as nerdy public school kids grinding it out in their high level math/physics/comp sci and engineering classes? Because I was thinking the same..
What is this nonsense?!?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh my God - I just clicked on one randomly (sidwell) and the mystery of why so many of our 4.6, 1600 Sat kids are not getting into elite schools comes into pretty clear focus. The obvious bias that every kid there is headed to a top five school is actually sickening. Stunning. Seems they waltz right in if the parents had the money and location to attend this schools. So much for a meritocracy.
Haha, are you saying you can take one look at their blond/brown hair and privileged bro vibe and *know* they’re not as smart as nerdy public school kids grinding it out in their high level math/physics/comp sci and engineering classes? Because I was thinking the same..
What is this nonsense?!?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh my God - I just clicked on one randomly (sidwell) and the mystery of why so many of our 4.6, 1600 Sat kids are not getting into elite schools comes into pretty clear focus. The obvious bias that every kid there is headed to a top five school is actually sickening. Stunning. Seems they waltz right in if the parents had the money and location to attend this schools. So much for a meritocracy.
Haha, are you saying you can take one look at their blond/brown hair and privileged bro vibe and *know* they’re not as smart as nerdy public school kids grinding it out in their high level math/physics/comp sci and engineering classes? Because I was thinking the same..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh my God - I just clicked on one randomly (sidwell) and the mystery of why so many of our 4.6, 1600 Sat kids are not getting into elite schools comes into pretty clear focus. The obvious bias that every kid there is headed to a top five school is actually sickening. Stunning. Seems they waltz right in if the parents had the money and location to attend this schools. So much for a meritocracy.
Haha, are you saying you can take one look at their blond/brown hair and privileged bro vibe and *know* they’re not as smart as nerdy public school kids grinding it out in their high level math/physics/comp sci and engineering classes? Because I was thinking the same..
Anonymous wrote:Oh my God - I just clicked on one randomly (sidwell) and the mystery of why so many of our 4.6, 1600 Sat kids are not getting into elite schools comes into pretty clear focus. The obvious bias that every kid there is headed to a top five school is actually sickening. Stunning. Seems they waltz right in if the parents had the money and location to attend this schools. So much for a meritocracy.