Anonymous wrote:With two divorces under his belt, he seems like a good fit for the incoming admin.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-says-he-will-nominate-fox-news-host-pete-hegseth-defense-secretary-2024-11-13/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The SecDef’s job is to manage a massive bureaucracy, not to say stupid shit on tv. There are at least a million people in the U.S. who are more qualified and better suited to the job than Hegseth. Nothing about him is qualifying. It is amazing that after all of his dumbassery, Trump can still prove that he is even stupider than we thought.
With Trump, it can always get worse. ALWAYS.
Anonymous wrote:The SecDef’s job is to manage a massive bureaucracy, not to say stupid shit on tv. There are at least a million people in the U.S. who are more qualified and better suited to the job than Hegseth. Nothing about him is qualifying. It is amazing that after all of his dumbassery, Trump can still prove that he is even stupider than we thought.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tattoos in the military? When did that become acceptable?
For at least the past 40 years.
I don’t think this guy is qualified but there’s a lot more to complain about than tattoos.
DP. LOL. I just remember Louis Gossett Jr screaming at Richard Gere that officers do not have tattoos. It’s low class. And yes, that movie is about forty years.
Ah, the good ol days back when people used to wear suits to the office and to church. Times have changed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wtf
Princeton ROTC. Served active in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Gitmo. Bronze star. A political and media creature since then, but still serves in the Guard. At least he can relate to being in the military.
Oh well...if he can relate to being in the military then sign him up. It is the Secretary of defense so being able to relate to being in the military would be such a great quality.
The current one was previously a four star general
Which means he’s an irretrievable swamp creature .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wtf
Princeton ROTC. Served active in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Gitmo. Bronze star. A political and media creature since then, but still serves in the Guard. At least he can relate to being in the military.
Oh well...if he can relate to being in the military then sign him up. It is the Secretary of defense so being able to relate to being in the military would be such a great quality.
The current one was previously a four star general
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pete is a grunt. Grunts are the guys who don’t leave anyone behind and have actual skin in the game.
Of course dcum doesn’t like him, he works for a living.
I will take a grunt over 10,000 4 star generals any day of the week.
He's far more than a grunt, but never made the "political" transition to rise above the rank of major. That said, he isn't a babe in the woods when it comes to civilian politics, having covered that in his stint at FOX. Yes, that's one of the reasons Trump nominated him, but it's not the only one. It seems like Trump is tired of the career politicians with token military service serving as SECDEF. He wants someone who will execute his agenda for the DoD - not someone who has their own agenda and is looking to sit on corporate boards for big $$$ after a few years.
Someone to "execute" with no executive experience?
It's just so painfully obvious. He has no executive experience. He's a Fox News weekend host. This isn't the job to get that executive experience. He has no chance of being effective.
Not trying to be funny here but aren’t all the generals on tv? It doesn’t seem like they frequent airbases or visit the troops. Too busy getting their makeup done to appear with Dana Bash or Anderson Cooper
Anonymous wrote:Tattoos in the military? When did that become acceptable?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tattoos in the military? When did that become acceptable?
For at least the past 40 years.
I don’t think this guy is qualified but there’s a lot more to complain about than tattoos.
DP. LOL. I just remember Louis Gossett Jr screaming at Richard Gere that officers do not have tattoos. It’s low class. And yes, that movie is about forty years.
Anonymous wrote:Good that he’s not just another general. We have so many of them running around we don’t know what to do with them all. But I’d prefer to have an experienced civilian with private sector experience running large organizations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tattoos in the military? When did that become acceptable?
For at least the past 40 years.
I don’t think this guy is qualified but there’s a lot more to complain about than tattoos.