Anonymous wrote:DNC is denying it but they just fired hundreds of their staff and are still aggressively fund raising.
Got fired today, no severance- one day notice.

https://dailycaller.com/2024/11/18/democrats-dnc-firings-harris-campaign-debt/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DNC is denying it but they just fired hundreds of their staff and are still aggressively fund raising.
Got fired today, no severance- one day notice.

https://dailycaller.com/2024/11/18/democrats-dnc-firings-harris-campaign-debt/

A right wing paper founded by Tucker Carlson is your source.

Anonymous wrote:There's no evidence of this debt


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/harris-campaign-debt/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Managing a mammoth campaign is actually a great test run to see how one would manage the country/federal departments and agencies. Obviously gross incompetence and Poe judgment is Kamala’s middle name so it should be no surprise her campaign was a disaster. I get the sense Obama and Bill Clinton knew she wasn’t going to run a great campaign and endorsed her half heartedly at the final hour

Exactly. There were always questions about Kamala Harris’s managerial competency. We now have more real time data to confirm those prior accounts and it’s not pretty.

But we don’t tho. Just speculation from trolls on twitter.

DP. Is the NYT "trolls on twitter"? What an embarrassment.

It was a spree that averaged roughly $100 million per week.

The frenzied spending has led to second-guessing among some Democrats, including whether investing in celebrity-fueled events with stars such as Lady Gaga and Beyoncé was more ostentatious than effective.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/17/us/politics/harris-campaign-finances.html

Again. That’s spending, not debt.
Still no proof of debt.

Oh, ok. Then why is the Harris campaign STILL soliciting donations from their rubes? Why would they continue to do that - after the election is over? Hmm.

Anonymous wrote:DNC is denying it but they just fired hundreds of their staff and are still aggressively fund raising.
Got fired today, no severance- one day notice.

https://dailycaller.com/2024/11/18/democrats-dnc-firings-harris-campaign-debt/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Managing a mammoth campaign is actually a great test run to see how one would manage the country/federal departments and agencies. Obviously gross incompetence and Poe judgment is Kamala’s middle name so it should be no surprise her campaign was a disaster. I get the sense Obama and Bill Clinton knew she wasn’t going to run a great campaign and endorsed her half heartedly at the final hour

Exactly. There were always questions about Kamala Harris’s managerial competency. We now have more real time data to confirm those prior accounts and it’s not pretty.

But we don’t tho. Just speculation from trolls on twitter.

DP. Is the NYT "trolls on twitter"? What an embarrassment.

It was a spree that averaged roughly $100 million per week.

The frenzied spending has led to second-guessing among some Democrats, including whether investing in celebrity-fueled events with stars such as Lady Gaga and Beyoncé was more ostentatious than effective.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/17/us/politics/harris-campaign-finances.html

Again. That’s spending, not debt.
Still no proof of debt.

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have a running tally?

This is confirmed:
- Sharpton’s non-profit: $500k
- Oprah’s Harpo Productions: $2.5m

This is rumored but not confirmed:
- Beyoncé: $10m
- Megan Thee Stallion: $5m
- Lizzo: $3m
- Eminem: $1.8m

Anonymous wrote:Democrats were delusional, thinking changing candidates would allow them to keep the presidency. The problem wasn’t Biden’s age. The problem is Democrats’ disastrous policies and political messaging. They seem to have no idea how unpopular many of their policies are and how bad their image is across much of the country.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Managing a mammoth campaign is actually a great test run to see how one would manage the country/federal departments and agencies. Obviously gross incompetence and Poe judgment is Kamala’s middle name so it should be no surprise her campaign was a disaster. I get the sense Obama and Bill Clinton knew she wasn’t going to run a great campaign and endorsed her half heartedly at the final hour

Exactly. There were always questions about Kamala Harris’s managerial competency. We now have more real time data to confirm those prior accounts and it’s not pretty.

But we don’t tho. Just speculation from trolls on twitter.

DP. Is the NYT "trolls on twitter"? What an embarrassment.

It was a spree that averaged roughly $100 million per week.

The frenzied spending has led to second-guessing among some Democrats, including whether investing in celebrity-fueled events with stars such as Lady Gaga and Beyoncé was more ostentatious than effective.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/17/us/politics/harris-campaign-finances.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Managing a mammoth campaign is actually a great test run to see how one would manage the country/federal departments and agencies. Obviously gross incompetence and Poe judgment is Kamala’s middle name so it should be no surprise her campaign was a disaster. I get the sense Obama and Bill Clinton knew she wasn’t going to run a great campaign and endorsed her half heartedly at the final hour

Exactly. There were always questions about Kamala Harris’s managerial competency. We now have more real time data to confirm those prior accounts and it’s not pretty.

But we don’t tho. Just speculation from trolls on twitter.