Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harris said no religious exceptions. She wants to force Catholic doctors and hospitals to perform abortions.
Good. In some places, the only hospital is unfortunately a Catholic hospital. And now that the conservatives have gotten rid of any abortion clinics, it is what it is.
Just because you are Catholic, doesn't mean the rest of us are. Leave us alone, give us a choice, and you can do what you want.
You say we can do what we want, but we do not want to kill babies.
Well no one is making *you* specifically do it.
But if you are the only hospital for hundreds of miles, you need to make sure someone on your staff will prioritize the life of a pregnant woman over whatever qualms you have about hastening the end of the dying fetus inside her. That seems like a reasonable demand of any hospital especially if it is taking state and government funds and the people living near it have no other choice. Then you need to provide the service one way or another.
Reality check: Catholic hospitals will close rather than be forced to do something against Catholic teachings, regardless of whether the next closest hospital is 500 miles away.
Reality Check: Catholic Hospitals make money. They push millions of dollars to their executives. They will not close.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suppose that describes me - I'm voting on the combination of abortion rights and not electing the guy who admires Hitler.
There are one or two Trump voting women on here who are going to be gently whipsawed from the start of your post to the end.
Anonymous wrote:I suppose that describes me - I'm voting on the combination of abortion rights and not electing the guy who admires Hitler.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harris said no religious exceptions. She wants to force Catholic doctors and hospitals to perform abortions.
Good. In some places, the only hospital is unfortunately a Catholic hospital. And now that the conservatives have gotten rid of any abortion clinics, it is what it is.
Just because you are Catholic, doesn't mean the rest of us are. Leave us alone, give us a choice, and you can do what you want.
You say we can do what we want, but we do not want to kill babies.
Well no one is making *you* specifically do it.
But if you are the only hospital for hundreds of miles, you need to make sure someone on your staff will prioritize the life of a pregnant woman over whatever qualms you have about hastening the end of the dying fetus inside her. That seems like a reasonable demand of any hospital especially if it is taking state and government funds and the people living near it have no other choice. Then you need to provide the service one way or another.
Reality check: Catholic hospitals will close rather than be forced to do something against Catholic teachings, regardless of whether the next closest hospital is 500 miles away.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harris said no religious exceptions. She wants to force Catholic doctors and hospitals to perform abortions.
Good. In some places, the only hospital is unfortunately a Catholic hospital. And now that the conservatives have gotten rid of any abortion clinics, it is what it is.
Just because you are Catholic, doesn't mean the rest of us are. Leave us alone, give us a choice, and you can do what you want.
You say we can do what we want, but we do not want to kill babies.
Well no one is making *you* specifically do it.
But if you are the only hospital for hundreds of miles, you need to make sure someone on your staff will prioritize the life of a pregnant woman over whatever qualms you have about hastening the end of the dying fetus inside her. That seems like a reasonable demand of any hospital especially if it is taking state and government funds and the people living near it have no other choice. Then you need to provide the service one way or another.
Reality check: Catholic hospitals will close rather than be forced to do something against Catholic teachings, regardless of whether the next closest hospital is 500 miles away.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harris said no religious exceptions. She wants to force Catholic doctors and hospitals to perform abortions.
Good. In some places, the only hospital is unfortunately a Catholic hospital. And now that the conservatives have gotten rid of any abortion clinics, it is what it is.
Just because you are Catholic, doesn't mean the rest of us are. Leave us alone, give us a choice, and you can do what you want.
You say we can do what we want, but we do not want to kill babies.
Well no one is making *you* specifically do it.
But if you are the only hospital for hundreds of miles, you need to make sure someone on your staff will prioritize the life of a pregnant woman over whatever qualms you have about hastening the end of the dying fetus inside her. That seems like a reasonable demand of any hospital especially if it is taking state and government funds and the people living near it have no other choice. Then you need to provide the service one way or another.
Anonymous wrote:
It's heartbreaking. It's like Trump has unleashed a meanness in the Republican party and made it ok to have not have any empathy for fellow Americans who have to bear the personal cost as humans to your political policies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just don’t get why people want the option to terminate past viability.
It is extremely rare and always for a heartbreaking catastrophic reason. This has been explained over and over and over again.
It is not extremely rare and it is not always for a catastrophic reason. As has been shown over and over on this board, third trimester abortions have been had over things like fights with a boyfriend to financial issues to delay in seeking care. No matter how much you want what you say to be true, it simply isn’t.
Anonymous wrote:I just don’t get why people want the option to terminate past viability.
Anonymous wrote:Because I am not a walking uterus.
Believe it or not, women also have opinions about immigration, crime, crowded public schools, Title IX, and yes, even taxes.
Anonymous wrote:Women also use birth control.
Stop by your county health department to get free birth control.
Anonymous wrote:I’m pro choice and will be voting blue regardless, but am I the only woman who has never worried about getting pregnant?
I remember a high school health class (in the early 90s, amid nonstop AIDS hysteria, in an urban liberal secular area) when we were asked what we feared more: pregnancy or HIV. I was the only girl out of dozens who was more concerned about the thing that could kill me.
Obviously there were points in my life when I would not have welcomed a pregnancy, but so many women seem to be in a constant state of terror over it, and I’ve simply never understood it. There are so many ways to avoid pregnancy (I remember being 23, horny but a student with big plans, and I was on birth control, used a condom, made him pull out, AND made sure it wasn’t during my ovulation window; iuds weren’t even a thing back then), and yes, of course shit sometimes happens and it’s necessary or a good idea to abort, and I think it should be accessible and safe to do so, but there’s no reason to fret over it 24/7. I feel like I missed some fundamental part of being a woman in that I didn’t spend thirty years obsessing over possibly getting pregnant.