Anonymous wrote:Odd that Rogan, who is obsessed with Epstein, didn’t ask Trump, Epsteins longtime friend and under whose administration Epstein died, anything at all about Epstein. Almost likenthere was an agreement not to ask about such sensitive subjects.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:they don't seem too impressed over on the rogan subreddit

https://old.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/1gcc4hx/joe_rogan_experience_2219_donald_trump/

lot of mocking trump for being dumb and just saying whatever he feels like

The Joe Rogan thread on Reddit may be the absolute height of anecdata, but damn, no love lost for Trump there. Kind of brutal.

Honestly, the fact that most of them are calling it “boring” is very much what I expected. Trump rambled for 3 hours. WOW! Groundbreaking! Not like he doesn’t do that all the time at his rallies and fundraisers!

Except that it wasn't. The reason Joe Rogan is so successful is that he can make any guest look good, and conversation interesting. Rogan could probably do the same for Kamala, but there is no way her campaign will take a chance on her sitting for 3 hours for an unscripted conversational interview.

You must not have watched it. If it was so great the media would be showing his 3 hour plus “rallies” live. Trump has jumped the shark.

Well technically, the GOP is running a wannabe whale psychiatrist for President.

This was about Democrats' green energy plans is killing whales.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a good interview, TBH. By that I mean it was strategically sound. He came across as sounding like he always has: an mediocre communicator, but with good comedic timing and clearly not "suffering from dementia".

Strategically, it's a hell of a good voter market to target. They Rogan listeners were never going to vote Harris, but they may have chosen abstention. Now with this appearance and the RFK endorsement / stumping, he has locked in that demographic. of (mostly) Gen Z listeners.

+1

I don’t count on democrats understanding this.

They will probably run another ad about nazis and flood the zone with more unsubstantiated rumors, their stale playbook is not deep.

Rogan laughed at him when he gave his non-answer to the question of how the 2020 election was stolen.

And Rogan can, but the appearance was still a net gain for that voter niche.

I don't think it hurt Trump, but I think Trump supporters vastly overestimate the effectiveness of Trump's communication style. If you're used to hearing Trump you've sort of normalized it (whether you like him or hate him), but he does not come across as coherent to the casual listener. Sound bites are his friend. Three hours of rambling is not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:they don't seem too impressed over on the rogan subreddit

https://old.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/1gcc4hx/joe_rogan_experience_2219_donald_trump/

lot of mocking trump for being dumb and just saying whatever he feels like

The Joe Rogan thread on Reddit may be the absolute height of anecdata, but damn, no love lost for Trump there. Kind of brutal.

Honestly, the fact that most of them are calling it “boring” is very much what I expected. Trump rambled for 3 hours. WOW! Groundbreaking! Not like he doesn’t do that all the time at his rallies and fundraisers!

Except that it wasn't. The reason Joe Rogan is so successful is that he can make any guest look good, and conversation interesting. Rogan could probably do the same for Kamala, but there is no way her campaign will take a chance on her sitting for 3 hours for an unscripted conversational interview.

You must not have watched it. If it was so great the media would be showing his 3 hour plus “rallies” live. Trump has jumped the shark.

Well technically, the GOP is running a wannabe whale psychiatrist for President.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ouch

Joe "I'm a dumbass, use your own judgement about my guests" Rogan is the stronger communicator in that conversation?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ouch

Joe "I'm a dumbass, use your own judgement about my guests" Rogan is the stronger communicator in that conversation?

Anonymous wrote:ouch

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:they don't seem too impressed over on the rogan subreddit

https://old.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/1gcc4hx/joe_rogan_experience_2219_donald_trump/

lot of mocking trump for being dumb and just saying whatever he feels like

The Joe Rogan thread on Reddit may be the absolute height of anecdata, but damn, no love lost for Trump there. Kind of brutal.

Honestly, the fact that most of them are calling it “boring” is very much what I expected. Trump rambled for 3 hours. WOW! Groundbreaking! Not like he doesn’t do that all the time at his rallies and fundraisers!

Except that it wasn't. The reason Joe Rogan is so successful is that he can make any guest look good, and conversation interesting. Rogan could probably do the same for Kamala, but there is no way her campaign will take a chance on her sitting for 3 hours for an unscripted conversational interview.

You must not have watched it. If it was so great the media would be showing his 3 hour plus “rallies” live. Trump has jumped the shark.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:they don't seem too impressed over on the rogan subreddit

https://old.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/1gcc4hx/joe_rogan_experience_2219_donald_trump/

lot of mocking trump for being dumb and just saying whatever he feels like

The Joe Rogan thread on Reddit may be the absolute height of anecdata, but damn, no love lost for Trump there. Kind of brutal.

Honestly, the fact that most of them are calling it “boring” is very much what I expected. Trump rambled for 3 hours. WOW! Groundbreaking! Not like he doesn’t do that all the time at his rallies and fundraisers!

Except that it wasn't. The reason Joe Rogan is so successful is that he can make any guest look good, and conversation interesting. Rogan could probably do the same for Kamala, but there is no way her campaign will take a chance on her sitting for 3 hours for an unscripted conversational interview.

You must not have watched it. If it was so great the media would be showing his 3 hour plus “rallies” live. Trump has jumped the shark.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I with Kamal did the Rogan podcast. Then people will see the contrast between the two. Unfortunately, a missed opportunity.

Her stated reason was that they couldn't make the schedule work. Which given that Trump would up basically missing his Michigan rally due to the taping,so that he could ramble incoherently for three hours, no makes her look like she's just more important and organized than Trump.

It's not like she's not going popular podcasts, either. I think she should do Rogan if they can make the schedules work.

But yeah, that Houston rally seemed like a bigger deal than Trump's interview or his sad little Michigan rally.

Here's hoping.

I'm not happy about this, but some of you are delusional. There is NO WAY the Houston rally is a bigger deal than Rogan. And to even suggest that scheduling conflicts are preventing her from going on the biggest podcast in the world is laughable.

At this stage in the campaign it's about turning out the people you know are voting for you. Rogan's base is young, mostly white men. They aren't going for Harris anyway. Meanwhile a rally with Beyoncé where she talked extensively about abortion rights? Might motivate more young women to get to the polls.

She's not going to convince the core Rogan listener to vote for her right now. It would be cool if she did it (because I think she'd do well-- 1:1 somewhat adversarial interactions are good for her because they show off her prosecutorial skills) but I don't think it should be a priority.

+1. I think she has more to lose than gain at this point by going on Rogan.