Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, I think this verdict might increase his odds of winning. The outcome won’t impact democratic voter turnout, but I suspect it will boost registered republicans voter turnout to record levels.

You got that right. I just got a text from my “incensed” father in Georgia. A lifelong democrat who said he’s “done with the corruption” and is voting for Trump. Never voted for a Republican that I can remember

Yes, I am sure a life long democrat who voted twice against Trump, followed this trial and found Trump was witch-hunted.

Please.

Nobody knows what will happen with this.

Bill Clinton was not convicted of felonies, it was a completely different scenario because it was basically about an affair, which was forgiven for Trump many times over.

Independent voters do not like the idea of a felon for president, and the fact that it was a jury verdict has a very different sway.

It’s not just this trial, which yes he did seem to follow with some odd interest. I think the trial was the last straw.

Riiiiiight. And out of the trial that he did follow carefully, he came away with the conclusion that Trump was innocent. Uh huh.

He came away with the conclusion that the charges were invalid to begin with.

He wasn’t paying very close attention, then.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FYI, Trumps campaign donation web site has crashed, due to numbers of people trying to access it in the last 2 hours.

Just another data point for you who believe this “helps” a sinking Joe Biden.

This was going to happen. Doubt it's any new donors.

Sure. You keep telling yourself that.

Typical Trump incompetency. Make a website that doesn't crash.

He probably didn't pay the bill and they cut him off.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol...

More idiots in trailers giving away their pensions to a convicted felon! Every comment from a tRumper on this thread shows just how ignorant you all are. It's pathetic really.

Or… do you remember when the 2020 Trump campaign opened up tickets publicly on some platform and every person with any desire to mess with them requested tickets and Trump thought he’d be greeted by a crowd 50,000 strong… and it was like 500? I wouldn’t be surprised if a similar group decided to mess with Trump electronically again.

Rut Ruh...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, I think this verdict might increase his odds of winning. The outcome won’t impact democratic voter turnout, but I suspect it will boost registered republicans voter turnout to record levels.

You got that right. I just got a text from my “incensed” father in Georgia. A lifelong democrat who said he’s “done with the corruption” and is voting for Trump. Never voted for a Republican that I can remember

Yes, I am sure a life long democrat who voted twice against Trump, followed this trial and found Trump was witch-hunted.

Please.

Nobody knows what will happen with this.

Bill Clinton was not convicted of felonies, it was a completely different scenario because it was basically about an affair, which was forgiven for Trump many times over.

Independent voters do not like the idea of a felon for president, and the fact that it was a jury verdict has a very different sway.

It’s not just this trial, which yes he did seem to follow with some odd interest. I think the trial was the last straw.

Riiiiiight. And out of the trial that he did follow carefully, he came away with the conclusion that Trump was innocent. Uh huh.

He came away with the conclusion that the charges were invalid to begin with.

Excellent press conference by the Manhattan DA.

Anonymous wrote:What a sham trial. I was very unhappy that the Republicans (and the Democrats) couldn’t come up with someone else. But this is humiliating on a world stage. We look like a corrupt banana republic prosecuting political rivals. Talk about real election interference. Horrific.

Needless to say, at this point I will be voting Trump.

No, we looked corrupt and out of control on Jan 6. Now, we look like a democracy that stands behind the rule of law and the value that no one is above the law.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, I think this verdict might increase his odds of winning. The outcome won’t impact democratic voter turnout, but I suspect it will boost registered republicans voter turnout to record levels.

You got that right. I just got a text from my “incensed” father in Georgia. A lifelong democrat who said he’s “done with the corruption” and is voting for Trump. Never voted for a Republican that I can remember

:lol: He's "done with corruption," so he's voting for... Trump!

COMEDY GOLD!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

I would bet money DP has a girlfriend in Canada

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares!!!

I don’t given a crap he paid off a porn star to keep quiet. So what? How does that affect the typical person who can’t afford groceries, crime through the roof, illegal immigration bankrupting NYC, Chicago, Denver….

Most people do not care!!!!

It was more than paying off a porn star but ok, you’re not a details person.

Still don’t care.

You will be surprised how many voters care about inflation. Just ask the typical middle class voter in Wisconsin who makes 50k a year supporting their family. When they get their groceries, they have to make sacrifices on what they can afford and what they can not. They will vote with their pocketbook and it given a crap about Trump’s conviction.

I have family in Wisconsin. You're telling me they'll vote for a convicted felon facing prison time for president? Really?

+1

Our family in Wisconsin hate Trump and actively campaign against him. They are very much middle class - teachers, social worker and Mercury marine line worker. Ben Wikler is doing amazing work to take Wisconsin back.

Same for my midwestern family (different state, nearby though).

Another Midwestern state. Blue collar, non-union brother didn't vote Trump in '16 or '20 and can't imagine this verdict will tip the scales in Trump's favor in '24.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, I think this verdict might increase his odds of winning. The outcome won’t impact democratic voter turnout, but I suspect it will boost registered republicans voter turnout to record levels.

You got that right. I just got a text from my “incensed” father in Georgia. A lifelong democrat who said he’s “done with the corruption” and is voting for Trump. Never voted for a Republican that I can remember

:lol: He's "done with corruption," so he's voting for... Trump!

COMEDY GOLD!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Anonymous wrote:Lol...

More idiots in trailers giving away their pensions to a convicted felon! Every comment from a tRumper on this thread shows just how ignorant you all are. It's pathetic really.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They set Trump sentencing for July 11th, four days before the Republican National Convention begins. It’s all so transparently dirty.

Who is the "they" who set the sentencing? And who asked for the sentencing then? Oh, it was HIS OWN LAWYER.

Duh.

Come back and spin that.

There are ALWAYS RECEIPTS with ETTD!

Anonymous wrote:They set Trump sentencing for July 11th, four days before the Republican National Convention begins. It’s all so transparently dirty.

You MAGA will dream up anything to smear the judicial system holding your cult leader accountable.

Head’s up to you: it is pretty much the universal standard to set felony sentencing six weeks out from conviction to allow for the preparation of a pre-sentencing report by probation/parole for the consideration of the court in determining sentence. There are exceptions, but most would set the sentencing sooner rather than later. ~ former prosecutor/defense attorney with experience in multiple US jurisdictions

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sad day for anyone who believed in justice. Obviously will be vacated on appeal. Sad day to see the justice system used as a weapon against a political enemy though.

Just as obvious as all the predictions here about acquittal I suppose.

People were being naively optimistic, but it was pretty obvious as the judge would make rulings and the venue/where the jury pool came from that this wasn’t going to be a fair trial.

Trump was just crowing about his massive crowd at his recent Bronx rally. MAGA can’t have it both ways.

The jury was voir dired by Trump’s attorneys too - there were jurors on the panel who reported being Fox News and Truth Social followers.

It’s disgusting to see the attacks on the judicial system and especially on American jurors. Shame on Trump and his team and his followers.

This 100% this.

Anonymous wrote:Well I know Trump can run the country better from jail than bumbling stumbling Biden has done.

When his cases is appealed and overturned I hope he cuts funding to NY

What is it with you people? NY gives more money to the feds than what we receive. We are not Tate Reeves' Mississippi.