Anonymous wrote:I think that tweet is from a satire account?
The fillers comment…it seems dead on. Botox and fillers. I wonder if they have a provider on retainer for the whole family?
But my real question is....did this guy really have the portrait hanging on his bedroom wall? I mean, would you be creeped out if you found out that some random guy had a huge picture of you hanging on his bedroom wall? If I were Melania, I woudl not get within 100 feet of this guy, and might want a restraining order to keep him 100 feet from me.
Anonymous wrote:Oh boy this photo - the makeup is spackled on, and he has definitely had some fillers (and other assorted procedures). It's grotesque
![]()
think how bad he must look without those things, for him to make himself look like such a clown
Anonymous wrote:Oh boy this photo - the makeup is spackled on, and he has definitely had some fillers (and other assorted procedures). It's grotesque
![]()
think how bad he must look without those things, for him to make himself look like such a clown
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh boy this photo - the makeup is spackled on, and he has definitely had some fillers (and other assorted procedures). It's grotesque
![]()
think how bad he must look without those things, for him to make himself look like such a clown
You think? I don’t think he looks like he’s had any fillers. It looks like the exact same makeup he’s always worn. I’m sure it is, I don’t think he branches out ever. He never travels outside his properties, always eats exactly the same thing, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When are Guilfoyle and Jr. tying the knot?! Nothing like a big trump event for a fresh batch of content for this thread.
I assume never. I figured that the "engagement" was just cover for the evangelical base so that they aren't quite living in sin, but the complexities of the pre nup would be unresolvable, especially since he has kids from a former spouse. They'll get married if she gets a subpoena to testify.
(Note -- this is from the Bar Prep class -- there are two separate privileges. One is the marital privilege, which covers communications during the wedding. Don Jr. could invoke this to prevent his ex-wife from testifying about something he told her in confidence while married. She could still testify about things others told her, or that she witnessed. The other is the spousal right not to testify against their spouse (not really a privilege, but more like an outgrowth of the 5th amendment non-incrimination) -- that would allow KG to refuse to testify against Don Jr. with respect to anything she saw or heard IF they get married. This is my memory from bar class many decades ago.)