Anonymous wrote:The young adults I know who are rejecting marriage and child rearing have some kind of trauma from their childhood - usually really bad parent divorces. They do not want to rinse and repeat.

This is an unpopular opinion but I believe the fierce, I-can-do-it-myself-I don’t-need-anyone version of feminism is harmful to women. And the weak-feeble- women are loved, so I am not-I’m castrated so I’ll just play video games- message being sent to males is harmful to young men. And that’s everything that’s wrong with our society.

Women in African countries are being raped under the myth that having sex with a virgin will cure aids among many other ills that a society that is illiterate has. It's true that perhaps what you've said is a wrong in society, but it's not the only wrong in society. You simply don't have a lot of perspective on actual trauma that people are experiencing in this country and the world.

I can turn around your sentences to showcase these issues as addictions and power desires, not "messages" on femininity and masculinity or reactions to the opposite sex. The "I want as much money to buy whatever I want and as much safety as I can provide for myself" mentality women have and the "I can be as free from responsibility as I want while being as powerful as I want to feel in an imaginary world or in my head" mentality men have are harmful to men and women. See in this way, the desire comes from within and not as a response to another sex. Both come from a lack of discipline and both are fixable from a desire to change oneself.

The young adults I know who are rejecting marriage and child rearing have some kind of trauma from their childhood - usually really bad parent divorces. They do not want to rinse and repeat.

This is an unpopular opinion but I believe the fierce, I-can-do-it-myself-I don’t-need-anyone version of feminism is harmful to women. And the weak-feeble- women are loved, so I am not-I’m castrated so I’ll just play video games- message being sent to males is harmful to young men. And that’s everything that’s wrong with our society.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's wild that people think having children is optional. One of the few things we require from our kids: grandchildren. Investing all that time and money for children to selfishly end your family is insane.

Joke is on you. It is optional and we are living through a baby bust so other people think the same.

Nah, we raised our kids right and are highly likely to get a pile of grandkids. The baby bust people we know are sad, feminist heathens.

The joke is on you. But keep believing we are unhappy. Tee hee

NP—and I’m honestly hopeful that this is true and will mean that this brand of feminism will die out with this generation of super duper happy childless-by-choice self-indulgent me-first women.
That will actually be a very good thing for society at large.

Whatever makes you sleep at night. Fact is we all are going to die out. At least single child free women are the happiest.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's wild that people think having children is optional. One of the few things we require from our kids: grandchildren. Investing all that time and money for children to selfishly end your family is insane.

Joke is on you. It is optional and we are living through a baby bust so other people think the same.

Nah, we raised our kids right and are highly likely to get a pile of grandkids. The baby bust people we know are sad, feminist heathens.

The joke is on you. But keep believing we are unhappy. Tee hee

Absolutely fascinating psychology. Would be like the Duggars trolling reddit childfree.

As long as I have my harem of men for sex partners I will not object to my partner having a harem.

I get really bored fast with the same sex partner. This is one reason I like dating married men. No pressure either way.

Do our black kids we adopted from foster care count? There are 3.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's wild that people think having children is optional. One of the few things we require from our kids: grandchildren. Investing all that time and money for children to selfishly end your family is insane.

Joke is on you. It is optional and we are living through a baby bust so other people think the same.

Nah, we raised our kids right and are highly likely to get a pile of grandkids. The baby bust people we know are sad, feminist heathens.

Do you realize that some single women who want to get married and have kids cannot meet a partner?

I am married now, but my experience as a single professional woman in DC was horrific. Men expected sex after two or three dates and would not even commit to a dinner reservation, much less marriage. I consider myself very lucky to have met a wonderful man. Many of my friends have tried everything but cannot meet a man who will commit. The men they meet are either serial daters, social outcasts, or lazy dick scratching layabouts. If we want to criticize any women, let's criticize the ones who raised such losers.

The three-date rule has been around for 50 years.

That's fantastic. The difference is 50 years ago you at least had to leave your house to meet a woman and get a date. So those guys at least had basic skills. Now men expect sex just for sitting in their house on their Phone and swiping Tinder.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's wild that people think having children is optional. One of the few things we require from our kids: grandchildren. Investing all that time and money for children to selfishly end your family is insane.

Joke is on you. It is optional and we are living through a baby bust so other people think the same.

Nah, we raised our kids right and are highly likely to get a pile of grandkids. The baby bust people we know are sad, feminist heathens.

The joke is on you. But keep believing we are unhappy. Tee hee

NP—and I’m honestly hopeful that this is true and will mean that this brand of feminism will die out with this generation of super duper happy childless-by-choice self-indulgent me-first women.
That will actually be a very good thing for society at large.

I see all the women haters are out in abundance this morning. I wish you all would publicly out yourselves so we know who you are. Put some gusto behind your beliefs and slurs. But you're either a bot/troll or too cowardly to do so.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's wild that people think having children is optional. One of the few things we require from our kids: grandchildren. Investing all that time and money for children to selfishly end your family is insane.

Joke is on you. It is optional and we are living through a baby bust so other people think the same.

Nah, we raised our kids right and are highly likely to get a pile of grandkids. The baby bust people we know are sad, feminist heathens.

Do you realize that some single women who want to get married and have kids cannot meet a partner?

I am married now, but my experience as a single professional woman in DC was horrific. Men expected sex after two or three dates and would not even commit to a dinner reservation, much less marriage. I consider myself very lucky to have met a wonderful man. Many of my friends have tried everything but cannot meet a man who will commit. The men they meet are either serial daters, social outcasts, or lazy dick scratching layabouts. If we want to criticize any women, let's criticize the ones who raised such losers.

The three-date rule has been around for 50 years.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's wild that people think having children is optional. One of the few things we require from our kids: grandchildren. Investing all that time and money for children to selfishly end your family is insane.

Joke is on you. It is optional and we are living through a baby bust so other people think the same.

Nah, we raised our kids right and are highly likely to get a pile of grandkids. The baby bust people we know are sad, feminist heathens.

Do you realize that some single women who want to get married and have kids cannot meet a partner?

I am married now, but my experience as a single professional woman in DC was horrific. Men expected sex after two or three dates and would not even commit to a dinner reservation, much less marriage. I consider myself very lucky to have met a wonderful man. Many of my friends have tried everything but cannot meet a man who will commit. The men they meet are either serial daters, social outcasts, or lazy dick scratching layabouts. If we want to criticize any women, let's criticize the ones who raised such losers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's wild that people think having children is optional. One of the few things we require from our kids: grandchildren. Investing all that time and money for children to selfishly end your family is insane.

Joke is on you. It is optional and we are living through a baby bust so other people think the same.

Nah, we raised our kids right and are highly likely to get a pile of grandkids. The baby bust people we know are sad, feminist heathens.

The joke is on you. But keep believing we are unhappy. Tee hee

NP—and I’m honestly hopeful that this is true and will mean that this brand of feminism will die out with this generation of super duper happy childless-by-choice self-indulgent me-first women.
That will actually be a very good thing for society at large.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's wild that people think having children is optional. One of the few things we require from our kids: grandchildren. Investing all that time and money for children to selfishly end your family is insane.

How exactly are you going to enforce this?

You don't "enforce" this, but you sure as heck raise your children to understand that the purpose of marriage is for a woman and man to raise children within the family unit. Also, when they start forming families, you support them financially with your savings from a lifetime of work. Any children who pursue a more selfish life are not assisted.

In short, if you want more of something, you subsidize it.

What if your kids couldn't have kids? Would you still punish them? And if you highly favored your children who had children please don't expect a loving relationship with your childfree children. Personally, I would work hard so I would not need your blood money AND I wouldn't see you ever again.

If a child did the right thing and got married young, you support him or her if there is an infertility struggle. That's bad luck and not the result of bad choices. If a daughter waits until she's 39 because she's pursuing her career (lol), then she's wasted her youth and a terrible disappointment. There is nothing better in this world than raising children and grandchildren. If a child is too selfish to continue the tradition of her ancestors, she dishonors her family and deserves scorn.

You would be welcome to go off into the ether to take care of yourself and let your bloodline die with you. I can't imagine a more shallow and selfish existence, and I'd wonder where I failed as a parent to raise such a person. A life serving others, especially your children and grandchildren, is far more rewarding than serving yourself.

If you truly feel that a life "serving" your children is better than "serving yourself," then you would actually support your children even if they don't want to make grandchildren that you desire. And you would definitely not write things like, "wow my daughter is an idiot for achieving a career to support her family before making one."

What does that mean? If that was the goal, that person hasn't achieved it if they didn't have kids then, right?

Anonymous wrote:Honestly with the way the world is, better not to bring children into this mess.

Yep

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's wild that people think having children is optional. One of the few things we require from our kids: grandchildren. Investing all that time and money for children to selfishly end your family is insane.

How exactly are you going to enforce this?

You don't "enforce" this, but you sure as heck raise your children to understand that the purpose of marriage is for a woman and man to raise children within the family unit. Also, when they start forming families, you support them financially with your savings from a lifetime of work. Any children who pursue a more selfish life are not assisted.

In short, if you want more of something, you subsidize it.

What if your kids couldn't have kids? Would you still punish them? And if you highly favored your children who had children please don't expect a loving relationship with your childfree children. Personally, I would work hard so I would not need your blood money AND I wouldn't see you ever again.

If a child did the right thing and got married young, you support him or her if there is an infertility struggle. That's bad luck and not the result of bad choices. If a daughter waits until she's 39 because she's pursuing her career (lol), then she's wasted her youth and a terrible disappointment. There is nothing better in this world than raising children and grandchildren. If a child is too selfish to continue the tradition of her ancestors, she dishonors her family and deserves scorn.

You would be welcome to go off into the ether to take care of yourself and let your bloodline die with you. I can't imagine a more shallow and selfish existence, and I'd wonder where I failed as a parent to raise such a person. A life serving others, especially your children and grandchildren, is far more rewarding than serving yourself.

This is either a very expert troll or someone who wasn't allowed to expose their ankles as a child and still adheres to that because she believes it tempts the male gaze. If it's the later, girl, I am so sorry.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's wild that people think having children is optional. One of the few things we require from our kids: grandchildren. Investing all that time and money for children to selfishly end your family is insane.

Joke is on you. It is optional and we are living through a baby bust so other people think the same.

Nah, we raised our kids right and are highly likely to get a pile of grandkids. The baby bust people we know are sad, feminist heathens.

The joke is on you. But keep believing we are unhappy. Tee hee