Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know the TOK class is required but does anyone know what is taught in that class?
It’s my DD’s favorite class she’s ever taken.
It’s basically epistemology—what do we know, and how do we know it? Why is knowledge important? How does it relate to concepts like culture and community? She loves it because it’s very analytical, and favors deep thinking and argumentative writing over regurgitating facts.
They do a good bit of writing and some presentations, but in general it’s kind of an overarching theory class that is supposed to tie together all the other courses they take. But I’m sure the quality depends a lot on the instructor, too.
I found it pretentious and cringey, but I agree that it depends a lot on the instructor.
Most often it’s still going to regurgitate some ideas from Plato, Kant, Hume, Locke etc, albeit at poorly understood high school level.
To be honest the writing part of my DC IB program was quite underwhelming, essentially quantity over quality. It doesn’t help that the instructor is actually not capable of writing or teaching.
Instead of the extended essay I think my student would have been way better off with a solid practice of a five paragraph essay, strong understanding of grammar and a well developed vocabulary. I’d much prefer a short assignment that is well edited to be crisp and clear instead of 10 pages of rambling sentences. The teacher feedback was nonexistent, so had have to figure it out on his own.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know the TOK class is required but does anyone know what is taught in that class?
It’s my DD’s favorite class she’s ever taken.
It’s basically epistemology—what do we know, and how do we know it? Why is knowledge important? How does it relate to concepts like culture and community? She loves it because it’s very analytical, and favors deep thinking and argumentative writing over regurgitating facts.
They do a good bit of writing and some presentations, but in general it’s kind of an overarching theory class that is supposed to tie together all the other courses they take. But I’m sure the quality depends a lot on the instructor, too.
I found it pretentious and cringey, but I agree that it depends a lot on the instructor.
Most often it’s still going to regurgitate some ideas from Plato, Kant, Hume, Locke etc, albeit at poorly understood high school level.
To be honest the writing part of my DC IB program was quite underwhelming, essentially quantity over quality. It doesn’t help that the instructor is actually not capable of writing or teaching.
Instead of the extended essay I think my student would have been way better off with a solid practice of a five paragraph essay, strong understanding of grammar and a well developed vocabulary. I’d much prefer a short assignment that is well edited to be crisp and clear instead of 10 pages of rambling sentences. The teacher feedback was nonexistent, so had have to figure it out on his own.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know the TOK class is required but does anyone know what is taught in that class?
It’s my DD’s favorite class she’s ever taken.
It’s basically epistemology—what do we know, and how do we know it? Why is knowledge important? How does it relate to concepts like culture and community? She loves it because it’s very analytical, and favors deep thinking and argumentative writing over regurgitating facts.
They do a good bit of writing and some presentations, but in general it’s kind of an overarching theory class that is supposed to tie together all the other courses they take. But I’m sure the quality depends a lot on the instructor, too.
Anonymous wrote:I know the TOK class is required but does anyone know what is taught in that class?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here with an update. She did make it and was put on the wait pool for blair.
Congrats! Proud parent of an RMIB senior who was just admitted to the University of Maryland Honors college for the Smith school of business a few minutes ago.
Anonymous wrote:OP here with an update. She did make it and was put on the wait pool for blair.
Anonymous wrote:OP here with an update. She did make it and was put on the wait pool for blair.
Anonymous wrote:I know the TOK class is required but does anyone know what is taught in that class?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which one? Kennedy and Watkins Mill are really the worst, so as long as it's not either of those it might be ok.Anonymous wrote:I've heard a lot of people in this forum say the regional programs are bad. Is there anyone who has a child who attends one who can attest to its quality?
How do you know?
We've been through the data before. Check the other threads and catch up.
DP. Yes, we've been through the data, and they don't show "Kennedy and Watkins Mill are really the worst." So we're back to the question: how do you know?

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which one? Kennedy and Watkins Mill are really the worst, so as long as it's not either of those it might be ok.Anonymous wrote:I've heard a lot of people in this forum say the regional programs are bad. Is there anyone who has a child who attends one who can attest to its quality?
How do you know?
We've been through the data before. Check the other threads and catch up.