Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One interesting thing about GDS is that they limit students to 10 applications, only 3 of which may be “reaches.” And they define any school with an acceptance rate of 20% (or 25%?) or less to be a reach. That means GDS students are effectively unable to shotgun all the top 10 schools, or all Ivy League, or whatever.
(They are allowing students this year to apply to 2 more schools beyond the usual 10, but the additional ones must be “foundational” — or safety — schools. This is a response to the uncertainty created by the Supreme Court.)
I don’t know if other private schools have similar policies. But I do think that in the absence of these policies, you would probably find more “shotgunning” and thus more admissions to highly selective schools. They are quite serious about the policy — my kid got into a couple safeties in early action, but the school would not permit him to add another reach school for regular admission. He could only add “foundational” schools even with admissions in hand.
How can they restrict the number of schools a kid applies to?? That seems ridiculous
Anonymous wrote:One interesting thing about GDS is that they limit students to 10 applications, only 3 of which may be “reaches.” And they define any school with an acceptance rate of 20% (or 25%?) or less to be a reach. That means GDS students are effectively unable to shotgun all the top 10 schools, or all Ivy League, or whatever.
(They are allowing students this year to apply to 2 more schools beyond the usual 10, but the additional ones must be “foundational” — or safety — schools. This is a response to the uncertainty created by the Supreme Court.)
I don’t know if other private schools have similar policies. But I do think that in the absence of these policies, you would probably find more “shotgunning” and thus more admissions to highly selective schools. They are quite serious about the policy — my kid got into a couple safeties in early action, but the school would not permit him to add another reach school for regular admission. He could only add “foundational” schools even with admissions in hand.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yup, and that public HS is doing better than GDS without legacies, athletic recruitment, URMs and donations etc.
That's right, no athletes or Ivy legacies from rich families in DC area public schools at all.
Anonymous wrote:Yup, and that public HS is doing better than GDS without legacies, athletic recruitment, URMs and donations etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Worse outcome than a public high school in fairfax county. Shameful.
Yup, and that public HS is doing better than GDS without legacies, athletic recruitment, URMs and donations etc.
Which public high school has no sports, no people of color, and gets 2% of their seniors into Harvard?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Worse outcome than a public high school in fairfax county. Shameful.
Yup, and that public HS is doing better than GDS without legacies, athletic recruitment, URMs and donations etc.
Anonymous wrote:Let’s celebrate hard working kids!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Actual Parent: here's what's posted on the Insta page in terms of top tier
Other kids may have gotten in places but have not posted yet.
3 harvard
2 cornell
1 princeton
1 penn
1 Columbia
1 Vanderbilt
This seems good but not Stellar
Let's see what happens tommorrow with Northwestern Etc
What would you consider stellar???
Anonymous wrote:Worse outcome than a public high school in fairfax county. Shameful.
Anonymous wrote:Actual Parent: here's what's posted on the Insta page in terms of top tier
Other kids may have gotten in places but have not posted yet.
3 harvard
2 cornell
1 princeton
1 penn
1 Columbia
1 Vanderbilt
This seems good but not Stellar
Let's see what happens tommorrow with Northwestern Etc
Anonymous wrote:It's not just because of enviable Ivy admissions, but GDS arguably is DC's leading independent school now. The Cathedral schools are too inflexible and stuck in the past. Sidwell has been cruising on its reputation for a long time. But without the buzz from presidential or vice presidential children on its campuses, Sidwell's stagnation is showing.