Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[b]Anonymous wrote:The point is that if you are applying as an unhooked academic kid, you really do need to submit test scores at about 1540 or so.
This. Same at UVA. Last years incoming class had a 1510 at the 75th percentile (25 percent had higher). So if unhooked, and especially if from nova and competing against top kids from your high school, you want to try to hit well above a 1510.
But that 1510 is deceiving. A ton of UVA’s incoming class went TO. I am too lazy to look it up, but I bet someone else knows the exact percentage.
Anonymous wrote:17 year old senior in HS reading all of these crazy parent posts. I submitted a 1500 non super-scored test to Duke. I'm proud of scoring that. If they don't accept me, then it is their loss. I'm not hiding my scores as I think the people in admissions obviously know your score is lower if you don't submit it.
Life will go on if I get accepted or not. Same with your kids as well.
Anonymous wrote:17 year old senior in HS reading all of these crazy parent posts. I submitted a 1500 non super-scored test to Duke. I'm proud of scoring that. If they don't accept me, then it is their loss. I'm not hiding my scores as I think the people in admissions obviously know your score is lower if you don't submit it.
Life will go on if I get accepted or not. Same with your kids as well.
Anonymous wrote:[b]Anonymous wrote:The point is that if you are applying as an unhooked academic kid, you really do need to submit test scores at about 1540 or so.
This. Same at UVA. Last years incoming class had a 1510 at the 75th percentile (25 percent had higher). So if unhooked, and especially if from nova and competing against top kids from your high school, you want to try to hit well above a 1510.
What's unethical about the last one? Every parent curates their child's educational experience, and I don't see anything wrong with that.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:System is getting more and more fukced up
Yes, including rich people buying college counselors.
And helping write essays. And starting non-profits. And curating the kids educational experience starting in middle school. It’s pathetic - and yet they think it’s completely justified.
[b]Anonymous wrote:The point is that if you are applying as an unhooked academic kid, you really do need to submit test scores at about 1540 or so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A relative of mine knows someone who works in Duke admissions. This person said TO iOS not for white kids with college educated parents- that it’s seen as a red flag not to submit in that demographic situation. If 1500 is over the 25th quartile, submit
this is flat out wrong
Anonymous wrote:17 year old senior in HS reading all of these crazy parent posts. I submitted a 1500 non super-scored test to Duke. I'm proud of scoring that. If they don't accept me, then it is their loss. I'm not hiding my scores as I think the people in admissions obviously know your score is lower if you don't submit it.
Life will go on if I get accepted or not. Same with your kids as well.
Anonymous wrote:Didn't some of the Ivies just release a report that said they were able to identify a lot of students they would have accepted if only they had submitted their scores? These were borderline cases where the students had scores over 1400 but didn't submit them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Students in the bottom test quartile tend to bring something else to the table--eg, recruited athlete, URM, donor, legacy.
Hey. Wait a minute. you can’t have it both ways…..
So the 25% of the class that were admitted TO are “recruited athlete, URM, donor, legacy” AND the bottom quartile of the remaining 75% that did submit scores are the same group?
Newsflash: there ain’t that many scapegoats for your Argument. Try again. LOL
Anonymous wrote:Students in the bottom test quartile tend to bring something else to the table--eg, recruited athlete, URM, donor, legacy.