Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The video made me sick.
This guy doesn’t need “support,” he needs to be permanently separated from society.
If you are defending him, please pick him up and keep him at your house. You can support him.
Seriously this is the only sane response.
STFU about supports. Any person committing a heinous act can claim to be mentally ill (bc what same person would do this?) He needs to be away from society, I couldn't care less what happens to him.
OK MAGA.
A person is MAGA if they think a person with an extensive history of breakdowns that include harrassing people, specifically - sexually harassing people, dating back years, who violently attacked two daycare providers and masturbated in front of 30 daycare children, shouldn't be permanently hospitalized? OK.
Frankly, if DC does this right, they could file a separate charge for each child present, couldn't they?
I'm the PP and farthest thing from MAGA. I'm a POC and Democrat.
I also think anyone who is remotely okay with this situation is a complete sicko.
Is the mass shooter in Maine also just having a mental health crisis?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The video made me sick.
This guy doesn’t need “support,” he needs to be permanently separated from society.
If you are defending him, please pick him up and keep him at your house. You can support him.
Seriously this is the only sane response.
STFU about supports. Any person committing a heinous act can claim to be mentally ill (bc what same person would do this?) He needs to be away from society, I couldn't care less what happens to him.
OK MAGA.
A person is MAGA if they think a person with an extensive history of breakdowns that include harrassing people, specifically - sexually harassing people, dating back years, who violently attacked two daycare providers and masturbated in front of 30 daycare children, shouldn't be permanently hospitalized? OK.
Frankly, if DC does this right, they could file a separate charge for each child present, couldn't they?
I'm the PP and farthest thing from MAGA. I'm a POC and Democrat.
I also think anyone who is remotely okay with this situation is a complete sicko.
Is the mass shooter in Maine also just having a mental health crisis?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This man needs psychological support and you are all more than willing to destroy his life over something that was likely out of his control.
He can’t help himself because he is mentally ill. You have no empathy? His neighbors didn’t press charges because they were good human beings who didn’t want to see another Black man locked up or possibly killed.
We need to discuss mental health support above all else or this problem will not get better.
When's the last time you heard of a mentally ill woman exposing her genitals to children?
I am so tired of people excusing criminal and lewd behavior as "mental illness."
There’s a crazy woman over my the Anacostia Metro that routinely urinates, defecates and pleasures herself in front of the windows at the Thurgood Marshall Academy charter school.
I’ve personally seen her doing it on at least two dozen occasions.
So yes, it happens. Frequently.
Did you call the police EVERY SINGLE TIME or did you just shrug and go about your business.
Wouldn’t matter because everyone involved would blow you off. I truly do think SOME police care about crimes like this BUT their hands are tied by the fact that it’s very hard to force people into treatment, plus even if you arrest and take them to jail the perp won’t be prosecuted.
There is only one way to find out if you will be blown off and that is to report. Every time. I cannot imagine that you watched a woman do these things at least 24 separate times, in the window of a school, but didn't report. This is what is wrong with society. Report, every time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re arguing that the City Council - through delegated powers to some representatives on the JNC - has more power than the POTUS in sending judges to the U.S. Court of Appeals?
That’s a new moving of the goalposts!
Of course you’re surprised, you were just claiming those judges had nothing to do with the Mayor or the Council, when almost half of the members of the JNC are directly appointed by the Council and Mayor. The president appoints one member.
If you actually cared, you could check the judges on the courts and the recommendations of the JNC. EVERY SINGLE JUDGE on the DC Court of Appeals was first recommended by the JNC:
https://jnc.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/jnc/publication/attachments/2022%20JNC%20Report%20of%20Recomendations_FINAL%20v2.pdf
People are completely ignorant about how D.C. is run, and instead of actually educating themselves, they spend all of their time arguing that our elected officials shouldn’t do anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re arguing that the City Council - through delegated powers to some representatives on the JNC - has more power than the POTUS in sending judges to the U.S. Court of Appeals?
That’s a new moving of the goalposts!
Of course you’re surprised, you were just claiming those judges had nothing to do with the Mayor or the Council, when almost half of the members of the JNC are directly appointed by the Council and Mayor. The president appoints one member.
If you actually cared, you could check the judges on the courts and the recommendations of the JNC. EVERY SINGLE JUDGE on the DC Court of Appeals was first recommended by the JNC:
https://jnc.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/jnc/publication/attachments/2022%20JNC%20Report%20of%20Recomendations_FINAL%20v2.pdf
People are completely ignorant about how D.C. is run, and instead of actually educating themselves, they spend all of their time arguing that our elected officials shouldn’t do anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do intelligent people live in DC? I don’t get it.
Perhaps you don't get it because you are profoundly unintelligent yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The video made me sick.
This guy doesn’t need “support,” he needs to be permanently separated from society.
If you are defending him, please pick him up and keep him at your house. You can support him.
Seriously this is the only sane response.
STFU about supports. Any person committing a heinous act can claim to be mentally ill (bc what same person would do this?) He needs to be away from society, I couldn't care less what happens to him.
OK MAGA.
A person is MAGA if they think a person with an extensive history of breakdowns that include harrassing people, specifically - sexually harassing people, dating back years, who violently attacked two daycare providers and masturbated in front of 30 daycare children, shouldn't be permanently hospitalized? OK.
Frankly, if DC does this right, they could file a separate charge for each child present, couldn't they?
Anonymous wrote:You’re arguing that the City Council - through delegated powers to some representatives on the JNC - has more power than the POTUS in sending judges to the U.S. Court of Appeals?
That’s a new moving of the goalposts!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The evidentiary rulings you are citing that are batsh#t crazy came from the DC Court of Appeals. DC Circuit court judges are following precedent set by the higher court. This has nothing to do with the Mayor or City Council.
https://www.wusa9.com/amp/article/news/investigations/matthew-graves-us-attorney-4th-amendment-cases-lost/65-93c2162b-41f2-4caf-b37f-30d95c4a4cdf
The D.C. Judicial Nomination Commission recommends the judges for both the Superior Court and the Court of Appeals. 3 of the 7 members come directly from our elected officials - 2 from the mayor, one from the Council (2 come from the DC Bar, one comes from the District Court and one from the President).
https://jnc.dc.gov/page/about-jnc
I’m not sure why people want to keep pushing the lie that D.C. has no input here. Just to avoid any accountability and action on the part of our elected officials? I see so many people shout “Taxation without representation!” and then just completely ignore the representation we actually have. Even spreading falsehoods to discourage citizens from using the representation we currently have.
Anonymous wrote:The evidentiary rulings you are citing that are batsh#t crazy came from the DC Court of Appeals. DC Circuit court judges are following precedent set by the higher court. This has nothing to do with the Mayor or City Council.
https://www.wusa9.com/amp/article/news/investigations/matthew-graves-us-attorney-4th-amendment-cases-lost/65-93c2162b-41f2-4caf-b37f-30d95c4a4cdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The hearing that Jessica Liu did not attend and that the Council had no power to force her to attend?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-lawmakers-slam-us-attorney-for-skipping-hate-crimes-hearing/2019/10/23/0422ed1c-f5da-11e9-ad8b-85e2aa00b5ce_story.html
I thought you people hate “performative BS”?
She refused to attend, it received a lot of attention in the media, and Liu eventually responded by increasing hate crime prosecutions:
https://dcist.com/story/20/01/24/following-criticism-the-u-s-attorney-for-d-c-announces-increase-in-hate-crime-prosecutions/
I don’t know why you’d leave that out and try to convince people that this was “performative BS” unless you actually are pro-crime (and it seems like there’s a crazy activist segment who is these days) and trying to discourage people from demanding any action by the Council.
The Council was also outraged and demanded the USAO take action when that car thief was shot several months back (at least for the first half of the year, it was the only crime that Frumin or Parker spoke out about).
And even a tiny amount of publicity goes a long way. The whole reason why Graves took got criticized and eventually started to pull back from dropping so many cases is because a anonymous Twitter account with ~1,000 followers (at the time) dug into the numbers and publicized the fact that the USAO was dropping most of their cases. The Council should have a dedicated office looking at this data. Instead, our city has to rely on the charity of one anonymous Twitter user who does this in their free time. Heaven help us if they ever decide to move somewhere else.
Anonymous wrote:The hearing that Jessica Liu did not attend and that the Council had no power to force her to attend?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-lawmakers-slam-us-attorney-for-skipping-hate-crimes-hearing/2019/10/23/0422ed1c-f5da-11e9-ad8b-85e2aa00b5ce_story.html
I thought you people hate “performative BS”?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The video made me sick.
This guy doesn’t need “support,” he needs to be permanently separated from society.
If you are defending him, please pick him up and keep him at your house. You can support him.
Seriously this is the only sane response.
STFU about supports. Any person committing a heinous act can claim to be mentally ill (bc what same person would do this?) He needs to be away from society, I couldn't care less what happens to him.
OK MAGA.
A person is MAGA if they think a person with an extensive history of breakdowns that include harrassing people, specifically - sexually harassing people, dating back years, who violently attacked two daycare providers and masturbated in front of 30 daycare children, shouldn't be permanently hospitalized? OK.
Frankly, if DC does this right, they could file a separate charge for each child present, couldn't they?
DC 👏🏼 Doesn’t 👏🏼 Control 👏🏼 The 👏🏼 Prosecution
What isn’t registering with you? DC has no control over the USAO or the courts that will try this man. The DC residents nor the City Counsel get a say in this.
DC has no control over the courts? Every judge selected to serve in DC superior court is selected from a list chosen by the mayor and DC Council through the DC Judicial Nomination Commission. These are the same judges that have been reported to be making 4th Amendment evidentiary rulings that are completely out of step with prevailing precedents which is one of the reasons that the USAO cites for its low prosecution rates. But yes, please tell us more about your knowledge and insights about DC governance.
The evidentiary rulings you are citing that are batsh#t crazy came from the DC Court of Appeals. DC Circuit court judges are following precedent set by the higher court. This has nothing to do with the Mayor or City Council.
https://www.wusa9.com/amp/article/news/investigations/matthew-graves-us-attorney-4th-amendment-cases-lost/65-93c2162b-41f2-4caf-b37f-30d95c4a4cdf
Are they Democrats? Republicans?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The video made me sick.
This guy doesn’t need “support,” he needs to be permanently separated from society.
If you are defending him, please pick him up and keep him at your house. You can support him.
Seriously this is the only sane response.
STFU about supports. Any person committing a heinous act can claim to be mentally ill (bc what same person would do this?) He needs to be away from society, I couldn't care less what happens to him.
OK MAGA.
A person is MAGA if they think a person with an extensive history of breakdowns that include harrassing people, specifically - sexually harassing people, dating back years, who violently attacked two daycare providers and masturbated in front of 30 daycare children, shouldn't be permanently hospitalized? OK.
Frankly, if DC does this right, they could file a separate charge for each child present, couldn't they?
DC 👏🏼 Doesn’t 👏🏼 Control 👏🏼 The 👏🏼 Prosecution
What isn’t registering with you? DC has no control over the USAO or the courts that will try this man. The DC residents nor the City Counsel get a say in this.
DC has no control over the courts? Every judge selected to serve in DC superior court is selected from a list chosen by the mayor and DC Council through the DC Judicial Nomination Commission. These are the same judges that have been reported to be making 4th Amendment evidentiary rulings that are completely out of step with prevailing precedents which is one of the reasons that the USAO cites for its low prosecution rates. But yes, please tell us more about your knowledge and insights about DC governance.
The evidentiary rulings you are citing that are batsh#t crazy came from the DC Court of Appeals. DC Circuit court judges are following precedent set by the higher court. This has nothing to do with the Mayor or City Council.
https://www.wusa9.com/amp/article/news/investigations/matthew-graves-us-attorney-4th-amendment-cases-lost/65-93c2162b-41f2-4caf-b37f-30d95c4a4cdf