Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What would cause a depressurization event in an aircraft like this one?
Malfunction of the system, door or window, not sealed properly, etc.
My question is woukd this type of aircraft have a detection system that would drop oxygen masks?
Anonymous wrote:What would cause a depressurization event in an aircraft like this one?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ why did it disintegrate when other planes crash and parts are still recognizable?
Where are you getting that it disintegrated? I saw that they are taking larger parts to a secure facility in Delaware to complete the investigation. Sadly, they also found human remains.
Anonymous wrote:^^ why did it disintegrate when other planes crash and parts are still recognizable?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I read reporting last night that ATC lost contact with the pilots somewhere over New Jersey on the plane's flight to Long Island. So that's likely when the depressurization occurred.
So they were likely flying for 3+ hours while unconscious. The plane's autopilot seems to have turned the plane around at the Long Island airport when the pilot did not manually engage the landing procedures.
We are very lucky that this plane had enough fuel to crash in a rural area. It's just dumb luck that it didn't crash into a city or a busy area.
This is alarming and I would love to know more from aviation nerds why jets weren't assembled to investigate the first time they lost contact. I have seen the clip of the pilot landing at LAX and ATC yelling at him for not radioing back faster to confirm the runway was clear - like most people I assumed that when ATC radios you, you answer. So I am wondering how they not only lost contact but the plane didn't land, and it made it to DC before the Air Force assembled. God forbid it had run out of fuel over Manhattan, what a tragedy.
Small planes do crash, sometimes in inhabited areas. Remember the plane that crashed into the house by Gaithersburg?
But what do you think the ATC can do about an unresponsive plane at 30,000 feet? Shoot it down? Why would that be preferable?
I am not asking that it be shot down after not responding to the radio once. I am asking why it was allowed to not respond to contact, not land as scheduled, and then fly almost 300 miles before the Air Force assembled.
I’m not sure you understand this, but planes destroyed by fighter jets do not simply vanish into thin air. They fall in pieces from the sky in fire and fragments that are extraordinarily dangerous to people on the ground. And I’m not sure what you mean by “assembled.” The Air Force is always “assembled.” They respond when ordered to do so. That small plane was under constant observation. Planes are not like wild mustangs — no one can just ride up and rope them to take control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll confess to not reading the entire thread but jumped in on pg. 14, not 16. Just saw the news on the crash site. The plane was ...descimated. There were no plane-like parts to be recognized.
I think it was shot down. If it was, will we ever know?
I don't think the Air Force would have any problem confirming that they shot the plane down. The pilot and passengers were already dead, and it posed a threat to people on the ground if it landed somewhere populated.
There is no reason to believe it was shot down. It didn't have enough fuel to get back to TN.
They specifically said they did not shoot it down.
I’m a tiny bit skeptical about that because it conveniently crashed in an isolated site, where nobody else would be hurt, which is good. I’m not saying shooting it down was a bad choice either because I could’ve caused many more deaths.
Anonymous wrote:It just happened to run out of fuel in a part of va with few people? I'm not a conspiracy theorist but this story seems a little off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll confess to not reading the entire thread but jumped in on pg. 14, not 16. Just saw the news on the crash site. The plane was ...descimated. There were no plane-like parts to be recognized.
I think it was shot down. If it was, will we ever know?
I don't think the Air Force would have any problem confirming that they shot the plane down. The pilot and passengers were already dead, and it posed a threat to people on the ground if it landed somewhere populated.
There is no reason to believe it was shot down. It didn't have enough fuel to get back to TN.
They specifically said they did not shoot it down.
I’m a tiny bit skeptical about that because it conveniently crashed in an isolated site, where nobody else would be hurt, which is good. I’m not saying shooting it down was a bad choice either because I could’ve caused many more deaths.
This, I don't think it was shot down but if it was, I really don't care. Pilot and passengers had probably been dead for several hours at that point and it would've caused so much death and destruction if it had landed in say, downtown Staunton as opposed to the forest.
Payne Stewart's plane conveniently landed in a rural area, as well. Just luck I suppose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll confess to not reading the entire thread but jumped in on pg. 14, not 16. Just saw the news on the crash site. The plane was ...descimated. There were no plane-like parts to be recognized.
I think it was shot down. If it was, will we ever know?
I don't think the Air Force would have any problem confirming that they shot the plane down. The pilot and passengers were already dead, and it posed a threat to people on the ground if it landed somewhere populated.
There is no reason to believe it was shot down. It didn't have enough fuel to get back to TN.
They specifically said they did not shoot it down.
I’m a tiny bit skeptical about that because it conveniently crashed in an isolated site, where nobody else would be hurt, which is good. I’m not saying shooting it down was a bad choice either because I could’ve caused many more deaths.
Anonymous wrote:^^ why did it disintegrate when other planes crash and parts are still recognizable?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll confess to not reading the entire thread but jumped in on pg. 14, not 16. Just saw the news on the crash site. The plane was ...descimated. There were no plane-like parts to be recognized.
I think it was shot down. If it was, will we ever know?
It was not shot down. The DoD is saying it did not shoot the plane down, and the owner/victim's father/grandfather confirmed that it wouldn't have had enough fuel to make a complete return to Tennessee, which tracks with it crashing just NE of the town in TN where it took off.
The DoD also said it was doing training over the Chesapeake Bay and the pilot was given the all clear to break the sound barrier - about an hour before the news story about the plane came out. I wouldn't take any story the DoD throws out at face value.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll confess to not reading the entire thread but jumped in on pg. 14, not 16. Just saw the news on the crash site. The plane was ...descimated. There were no plane-like parts to be recognized.
I think it was shot down. If it was, will we ever know?
I don't think the Air Force would have any problem confirming that they shot the plane down. The pilot and passengers were already dead, and it posed a threat to people on the ground if it landed somewhere populated.
There is no reason to believe it was shot down. It didn't have enough fuel to get back to TN.
Anonymous wrote:I'll confess to not reading the entire thread but jumped in on pg. 14, not 16. Just saw the news on the crash site. The plane was ...descimated. There were no plane-like parts to be recognized.
I think it was shot down. If it was, will we ever know?