Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The school should have taken away the kids phones back in the fall/winter when the parents asked. Instead, the administration did nothing. And then the kids recorded things. It is a nice bit of irony.
You realize schools can't do that. Other Hardy parents literally threatened to sue me for confiscating kids phones.
that’s news to my DCPS middle school, which has a policy requiring kids to hand in phones in the morning.
Guess what? Parents can and do still refuse
ok so? sounds like you need better admins to back you up.
Why? I and my admin don't need to waste my time on the squeakiest wheels? You're just trying to change the subject bc you are wrong
reading comprehension fail
The comeback of the weak. But you are welcome to explain why I and my admin should waste our time
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The school should have taken away the kids phones back in the fall/winter when the parents asked. Instead, the administration did nothing. And then the kids recorded things. It is a nice bit of irony.
You realize schools can't do that. Other Hardy parents literally threatened to sue me for confiscating kids phones.
that’s news to my DCPS middle school, which has a policy requiring kids to hand in phones in the morning.
Guess what? Parents can and do still refuse
ok so? sounds like you need better admins to back you up.
Why? I and my admin don't need to waste my time on the squeakiest wheels? You're just trying to change the subject bc you are wrong
reading comprehension fail
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The school should have taken away the kids phones back in the fall/winter when the parents asked. Instead, the administration did nothing. And then the kids recorded things. It is a nice bit of irony.
You realize schools can't do that. Other Hardy parents literally threatened to sue me for confiscating kids phones.
that’s news to my DCPS middle school, which has a policy requiring kids to hand in phones in the morning.
Guess what? Parents can and do still refuse
ok so? sounds like you need better admins to back you up.
Why? I and my admin don't need to waste my time on the squeakiest wheels? You're just trying to change the subject bc you are wrong
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The school should have taken away the kids phones back in the fall/winter when the parents asked. Instead, the administration did nothing. And then the kids recorded things. It is a nice bit of irony.
You realize schools can't do that. Other Hardy parents literally threatened to sue me for confiscating kids phones.
that’s news to my DCPS middle school, which has a policy requiring kids to hand in phones in the morning.
Guess what? Parents can and do still refuse
ok so? sounds like you need better admins to back you up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The school should have taken away the kids phones back in the fall/winter when the parents asked. Instead, the administration did nothing. And then the kids recorded things. It is a nice bit of irony.
You realize schools can't do that. Other Hardy parents literally threatened to sue me for confiscating kids phones.
that’s news to my DCPS middle school, which has a policy requiring kids to hand in phones in the morning.
Guess what? Parents can and do still refuse
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The school should have taken away the kids phones back in the fall/winter when the parents asked. Instead, the administration did nothing. And then the kids recorded things. It is a nice bit of irony.
You realize schools can't do that. Other Hardy parents literally threatened to sue me for confiscating kids phones.
that’s news to my DCPS middle school, which has a policy requiring kids to hand in phones in the morning.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The school should have taken away the kids phones back in the fall/winter when the parents asked. Instead, the administration did nothing. And then the kids recorded things. It is a nice bit of irony.
You realize schools can't do that. Other Hardy parents literally threatened to sue me for confiscating kids phones.
Anonymous wrote:The school should have taken away the kids phones back in the fall/winter when the parents asked. Instead, the administration did nothing. And then the kids recorded things. It is a nice bit of irony.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This cohort of PTO parents totally blindsided staff and several kids. This was done unethically and put staff in an awkward situation by sending the petition to their dc gov emails. The fact that they have managed to get the principal out by bullying the system is sad. The IS is also to blame because as a first year principal, his boss was never in the school except three or four times this school year. Does he know any students' names? Does he care? No. He is just kowtowing to this white, privileged, bigoted clan of parents who need to worry about issues such that the school is old and should be modernized like other DCPS schools. Seeing how mean and ruthless these parents can be has me seeing them in a different light. There are ways of doing things. This was not it. Why is everything so secret? Why can't those parents who led the charge identify themselves? Are you afraid of the backlash and repercussions? Sad.
I mean, you’re on here calling the parents racist, and teachers are posting horrible threats about “Karens” etc. So of course the parents are going to stay anonymous if possible.
Anonymous wrote:tbh - I’ve visited middle schools in Bethesda. The Hardy parents are absolutely right to demand that the school have at least some modicum of organization and calm. The idea that parents are just supposed to accept that “all middle schools are violent” is wishful thinking. It’s not going to fly. Before you spput off about white parents, let me assure you that DCPS takes advantage of working class black families because they don’t have the same organizing resources.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:tbh - I’ve visited middle schools in Bethesda. The Hardy parents are absolutely right to demand that the school have at least some modicum of organization and calm. The idea that parents are just supposed to accept that “all middle schools are violent” is wishful thinking. It’s not going to fly. Before you spput off about white parents, let me assure you that DCPS takes advantage of working class black families because they don’t have the same organizing resources.
Please, share your actionable feedback from your time visiting bethesda
My feedback is, it’s complete bullsh*t to claim that all middle schools are full of sex, drugs and violence, with academics ignored. The actionable part was getting rid of the principal, so that’s done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:tbh - I’ve visited middle schools in Bethesda. The Hardy parents are absolutely right to demand that the school have at least some modicum of organization and calm. The idea that parents are just supposed to accept that “all middle schools are violent” is wishful thinking. It’s not going to fly. Before you spput off about white parents, let me assure you that DCPS takes advantage of working class black families because they don’t have the same organizing resources.
Please, share your actionable feedback from your time visiting bethesda