Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whole Foods in downtown has decided to close because of crime and vagrancy, and because the company can no longer guarantee the safety of its workers:
https://sfstandard.com/business/downtown-san-francisco-whole-foods-market-closing/
Starbucks has had to remove seats now because the homeless invading its stores:
https://www.sfgate.com/food/article/sf-castro-starbucks-seating-removed-17854447.php?IPID=SFGate-HP-CP-Spotlight
WFH is adding another whammy to the city, which is now expected to be in trouble with an $800M budget deficits:
https://sfstandard.com/politics/city-hall/san-franciscos-deficit-swells-to-780m-in-latest-sign-of-budget-distress/
Really said to see how SF style leadership has destroyed a once beautiful city that is falling into the pits of lawlessness and financial disaster. Mind-blowing how they can keep re-election the same over and over and over again when the results keep getting worse and worse and now and businesses are closing up shop and are fleeing. Why do so many other cities and voters continue to vote for politicians trying to run on a similar model like SF's politicians? It is scary how fast SF has declined.
Why do you care if you don't live there? I seriously don't care about the rural hellhole that most of the Republicans live in. You should do the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And what do you suggest they do to fix it, PP? Lock up every man, woman, and child on the streets in a for-profit prison?
Believe it or not, locking up criminals would be a good step forward. But it is not equitable or woke.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody wants to live there anymore. It’s too crowded and the real estate is worth too much.
If nobody wants to live there anymore how come real estate is still $$$$$$$?When people did not want to live in Detroit anymore you could buy homes for $2000.
Because nimbys block development, and CA liberals ironically prevent property taxes from rising appropriately for many people. There are a lot of govt factors interfering in SF’s housing market that drastically inflate costs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody wants to live there anymore. It’s too crowded and the real estate is worth too much.
If nobody wants to live there anymore how come real estate is still $$$$$$$?When people did not want to live in Detroit anymore you could buy homes for $2000.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Feces piles and pot smoke.
Horrible public schools
Massive influx of illegal immigrants and homeless.
That’s what your taxes get you.
Nice haiku!
If it was as bad as you imagine, people wouldn't spend so much money to live there. Simple economics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Feces piles and pot smoke.
Horrible public schools
Massive influx of illegal immigrants and homeless.
That’s what your taxes get you.
Nice haiku!
Anonymous wrote:Feces piles and pot smoke.
Horrible public schools
Massive influx of illegal immigrants and homeless.
That’s what your taxes get you.
Anonymous wrote:Nobody wants to live there anymore. It’s too crowded and the real estate is worth too much.
Anonymous wrote:Nobody wants to live there anymore. It’s too crowded and the real estate is worth too much.