Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Angelo has only lived here less than 1 year. He donated to Ebbin in May 2022 and has Washington, DC as his address.

I understand a few people have such a grudge that they'll vote for him as a protest vote, but would you really want to trust this 22 year old with $800M of our tax revenue and our kids' education?

Better than someone who thought that abusing teachers, Duran, and other parents was acceptable behavior.

That shows, at best, poor judgment. At worst…

Either way, not someone who should be on the SB.

So, yes, he is the more trustworthy candidate.

I know this has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but Miranda Turner never abused and teachers, Duran, or other parents. You're holding onto that grudge as hard as you, but your positions were wrong. We know that now but you just can't let it go.

I know this has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but Miranda Turner personally chose to partner and lead a group of parents who were abusive towards teachers, staff, and other parents. 100% her choice to do that.

Has her personal judgment or moral code changed since then? Has she apologized for any of that?

She has nothing to apologize for. She is not responsible for other people's actions. Have you apologized for letting your fear keep schools closed longer than necessary and the subsequent academic and socioemotional fallout that is disproportionately impacting the most vulnerable students?

She’s responsible for her actions. She *chose* to work with these people. For years.

I know it enrages you, but Arlington Parents for Education is doing effective, informed advocacy in APS. It's not a black mark to be involved in founding it. You need to let go of the past. You were wrong. Move on.

I’m concerned for the future. She has demonstrated poor judgment and stood by as people abused teachers, staff, and other parents. I don’t trust her to support teachers, APS, or parents *in the future*.

You've giving "I'm going to vote for Donald Trump because I don't trust Hillary Clinton" vibes.

More like, I’d vote for any Republican over Trump to keep Trump out.

Nope, you're rooting for the man that is very clearly unqualified and unfit for office over an experienced and involved woman who knows the issues. You're on the Trump side. Sorry.

She’s no Hillary.

And how is Angelo “unfit”?

BUT HER EMAILSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111

To steal a comment from an ARLNOW commenter:

Since you asked: (1) His first proposal was to make Plan B available in every high school bathroom; (2) He promoted himself as someone who worked for Beyer, when he was a volunteer (probably door knocker); (3) His website claims that he is an "Arlington story" because he greeted veterans at BWI and supported voter registration in Alexandria (geography much?); (4) He published a statement that he was withdrawing from the race, and then blamed suggestions that he was withdrawing on "rumors"; (5) He claims to serve on the APS School Health Advisory Board, but public records show he has only attended one meeting; and generally (6) If you have watched him in his last two debates, it becomes apparent that he knows nothing about the issues that plague APS.

He’s as “fit” as many of former SB members.

And he hasn’t stood by as partners bullied APS teachers, staff, and parents.

Bc he wasn’t even here. How can you even draw a comparison?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol, seriously? Reid Goldstein endorsed the child. Wow.

There are people that see him as the only viable option. And being on a school board in this day and age is a thankless job, so the competition is light.

+1

Based on what I've seen in posted videos, Reid's endorsement isn't going to age well. But the Stockton endorsement is a real coup for MT.

Are you kidding? No one knows who Stockton is, or cares about a rando from Maryland.

But keep trying to pretend it's a bigger deal than an endorsement from the current board chair. When are you people going to start taking Angelo seriously?

Brian Stockton was with APS. He's not a rando MoCo guy.

The people I know who are most keyed in definitely know who stockton is, had relationships with him and are definitely shocked about this endorsement. Good for her for getting it.

Agreed! I'm glad to see he wasn't really part of the closed-school cabal that Duran spearheaded. This is an important endorsement for Miranda showing that Stockton is in favor of a fresh approach that puts learning excellence back at the center of education and gets us away from all COVID-fear and fluffy diversity and inclusion initiatives.

So Miranda is going to fight against diversity and inclusion initiatives?

Still, crickets.

Based on what I've seen of Miranda on AEM, and in the Stockton endorsement, is that she will be focused on APS's awful achievement gaps. That should be the the focus of and goal of diversity and inclusion initiatives IMO.

You expect that she will discourage APS from "fluffy diversity and inclusion initiatives".

Miranda comes across as a no BS person who won't tolerate "fluffy" regardless of what it is modifying. But she demonstrates that she cares about seeing results from diversity and inclusion initiatives. I'm not sure what the PP meant about fluffy, but I know what I expect to see from this work and that's things like closing achievement gaps and disproportionate suspensions for starters.

Stop trying to walk this back. We all read the comment - that Miranda won't tolerate fluffy DEI initiatives and that's seen as a positive. That tells us everything we need to know about the priorities of her camp.

Stop trying to make an anonymous comment as if it came from Miranda herself. Same for my comments for that matter. There are forums coming up. Go ask her. She talks about all of her priorities if you can’t be bothered to ask her.

I think the Hillary to Trump comparison is a bit too close for some of you. You’re literally willing to support a 22 year old with no experience or competence over a a very qualified woman just because you hate her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know what is going on with this Angelo kid but the whole withdrawal tweet that disappeared is weird. My kids aren’t even in APS and now I feel like I have to drag myself out to vote bc this is so messed up.

I think misogyny is definitely playing a role in some of the anti-Miranda opinions.

We aren’t allowed to criticize people with vaginas?

Don’t be so patronizing.

Agree, I find it insulting to all women that you're trying to pull the gender card. Please. You have a candidate with a record that makes people very uncomfortable.

Stating that I think some (note the use of the word “some”) of the Miranda hate feels like misogyny isn’t “pulling the gender card.” It’s not even a terribly controversial statement. In any event, this won’t affect my kids. I’m just highly skeptical that someone who is barely an adult and hasn’t even lived here a year could do this job. I don’t have to agree with everything a particular candidate does or says, but being an adult with an employment or volunteer history is a prerequisite for me.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know what is going on with this Angelo kid but the whole withdrawal tweet that disappeared is weird. My kids aren’t even in APS and now I feel like I have to drag myself out to vote bc this is so messed up.

I think misogyny is definitely playing a role in some of the anti-Miranda opinions.

We aren’t allowed to criticize people with vaginas?

Don’t be so patronizing.

Agree, I find it insulting to all women that you're trying to pull the gender card. Please. You have a candidate with a record that makes people very uncomfortable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Angelo has only lived here less than 1 year. He donated to Ebbin in May 2022 and has Washington, DC as his address.

I understand a few people have such a grudge that they'll vote for him as a protest vote, but would you really want to trust this 22 year old with $800M of our tax revenue and our kids' education?

Better than someone who thought that abusing teachers, Duran, and other parents was acceptable behavior.

That shows, at best, poor judgment. At worst…

Either way, not someone who should be on the SB.

So, yes, he is the more trustworthy candidate.

I know this has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but Miranda Turner never abused and teachers, Duran, or other parents. You're holding onto that grudge as hard as you, but your positions were wrong. We know that now but you just can't let it go.

I know this has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but Miranda Turner personally chose to partner and lead a group of parents who were abusive towards teachers, staff, and other parents. 100% her choice to do that.

Has her personal judgment or moral code changed since then? Has she apologized for any of that?

She has nothing to apologize for. She is not responsible for other people's actions. Have you apologized for letting your fear keep schools closed longer than necessary and the subsequent academic and socioemotional fallout that is disproportionately impacting the most vulnerable students?

She’s responsible for her actions. She *chose* to work with these people. For years.

I know it enrages you, but Arlington Parents for Education is doing effective, informed advocacy in APS. It's not a black mark to be involved in founding it. You need to let go of the past. You were wrong. Move on.

I will give you that APE is better now than during the pandemic. But that is not relevant to this campaign as that shift took place AFTER Miranda left the leadership of the group. If anything that shift reflects poorly on her leadership. When she led APE, it was doing awful things. After she left, the new leaders decided to make a change. Good for them, but let's remember that Miranda was the leader back when APE was screaming and belittling teachers, pushing for fulltime in person school during surges and pre vaccines, pushing against safety measures saying they were not needed, saying teachers were lazy, wanting to order teachers back into unsafe schools or fire them, not caring about teacher health, the peddling of bad "science" that covid doesn't spread in schools, isn't worse than the flu, that HEPAs and outdoor lunch are not needed.

Thank god APS didn't listen to APE back then. We don't need Miranda in charge now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol, seriously? Reid Goldstein endorsed the child. Wow.

There are people that see him as the only viable option. And being on a school board in this day and age is a thankless job, so the competition is light.

+1

Based on what I've seen in posted videos, Reid's endorsement isn't going to age well. But the Stockton endorsement is a real coup for MT.

Are you kidding? No one knows who Stockton is, or cares about a rando from Maryland.

But keep trying to pretend it's a bigger deal than an endorsement from the current board chair. When are you people going to start taking Angelo seriously?

Brian Stockton was with APS. He's not a rando MoCo guy.

The people I know who are most keyed in definitely know who stockton is, had relationships with him and are definitely shocked about this endorsement. Good for her for getting it.

Agreed! I'm glad to see he wasn't really part of the closed-school cabal that Duran spearheaded. This is an important endorsement for Miranda showing that Stockton is in favor of a fresh approach that puts learning excellence back at the center of education and gets us away from all COVID-fear and fluffy diversity and inclusion initiatives.

So Miranda is going to fight against diversity and inclusion initiatives?

Still, crickets.

Based on what I've seen of Miranda on AEM, and in the Stockton endorsement, is that she will be focused on APS's awful achievement gaps. That should be the the focus of and goal of diversity and inclusion initiatives IMO.

You expect that she will discourage APS from "fluffy diversity and inclusion initiatives".

Miranda comes across as a no BS person who won't tolerate "fluffy" regardless of what it is modifying. But she demonstrates that she cares about seeing results from diversity and inclusion initiatives. I'm not sure what the PP meant about fluffy, but I know what I expect to see from this work and that's things like closing achievement gaps and disproportionate suspensions for starters.

Stop trying to walk this back. We all read the comment - that Miranda won't tolerate fluffy DEI initiatives and that's seen as a positive. That tells us everything we need to know about the priorities of her camp.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Angelo has only lived here less than 1 year. He donated to Ebbin in May 2022 and has Washington, DC as his address.

I understand a few people have such a grudge that they'll vote for him as a protest vote, but would you really want to trust this 22 year old with $800M of our tax revenue and our kids' education?

Better than someone who thought that abusing teachers, Duran, and other parents was acceptable behavior.

That shows, at best, poor judgment. At worst…

Either way, not someone who should be on the SB.

So, yes, he is the more trustworthy candidate.

I know this has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but Miranda Turner never abused and teachers, Duran, or other parents. You're holding onto that grudge as hard as you, but your positions were wrong. We know that now but you just can't let it go.

I know this has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but Miranda Turner personally chose to partner and lead a group of parents who were abusive towards teachers, staff, and other parents. 100% her choice to do that.

Has her personal judgment or moral code changed since then? Has she apologized for any of that?

She has nothing to apologize for. She is not responsible for other people's actions. Have you apologized for letting your fear keep schools closed longer than necessary and the subsequent academic and socioemotional fallout that is disproportionately impacting the most vulnerable students?

She’s responsible for her actions. She *chose* to work with these people. For years.

I know it enrages you, but Arlington Parents for Education is doing effective, informed advocacy in APS. It's not a black mark to be involved in founding it. You need to let go of the past. You were wrong. Move on.

I’m concerned for the future. She has demonstrated poor judgment and stood by as people abused teachers, staff, and other parents. I don’t trust her to support teachers, APS, or parents *in the future*.

You've giving "I'm going to vote for Donald Trump because I don't trust Hillary Clinton" vibes.

More like, I’d vote for any Republican over Trump to keep Trump out.

Nope, you're rooting for the man that is very clearly unqualified and unfit for office over an experienced and involved woman who knows the issues. You're on the Trump side. Sorry.

She’s no Hillary.

And how is Angelo “unfit”?

BUT HER EMAILSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111

To steal a comment from an ARLNOW commenter:

Since you asked: (1) His first proposal was to make Plan B available in every high school bathroom; (2) He promoted himself as someone who worked for Beyer, when he was a volunteer (probably door knocker); (3) His website claims that he is an "Arlington story" because he greeted veterans at BWI and supported voter registration in Alexandria (geography much?); (4) He published a statement that he was withdrawing from the race, and then blamed suggestions that he was withdrawing on "rumors"; (5) He claims to serve on the APS School Health Advisory Board, but public records show he has only attended one meeting; and generally (6) If you have watched him in his last two debates, it becomes apparent that he knows nothing about the issues that plague APS.

He’s as “fit” as many of former SB members.

And he hasn’t stood by as partners bullied APS teachers, staff, and parents.

BUT HER EMAILS!!!!!1111

Seriously, that's 100% what you sound like.

I’m holding her accountable for her actions. She chose bullying over APS.

I don’t trust her with our schools.

"I am holding her accountable for the actions of other people and supporting an unqualified man because I'm very very bitter."

EMAAAAAIIILLLLLLS

The “emails” didn’t actually do any harm, unlike the bullying and hostility (which we are seeing again here - shocker).

Miranda is an adult and made her own choices. When it came down to it, she didn’t choose APS. Therefore, I don’t trust her to make decisions for APS.

I’ll take a fresh positive, perspective over someone who has demonstrated that, when push comes to shove, she doesn’t support APS.

Interesting how you’re tripling down on the unqualified man.

NP. Stop trying to make this about gender. That doesn't really fly when most of the sitting school board is female.

We are judging Miranda based on her record and her actions. That's what people do in an election. That's what they should do.

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know what is going on with this Angelo kid but the whole withdrawal tweet that disappeared is weird. My kids aren’t even in APS and now I feel like I have to drag myself out to vote bc this is so messed up.

I think misogyny is definitely playing a role in some of the anti-Miranda opinions.

We aren’t allowed to criticize people with vaginas?

Don’t be so patronizing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Campaign contributions are public, right? When do we get to find out who hated Miranda enough to pay for Angelo to stay in?

Should we go there? Maybe we should. While we're at it, let's see all the people who usually donate to Republicans now donating to Miranda. Can't Republicans run their own candidate instead of trying to slip one in under the radar through the Dem caucus process. Follow the money.

Yes, the (checks notes) Arlington Democrats Precinct Captain and Planned Parenthood volunteer is definitely a deep cover R candidate. You are nuts.

Campaign finance reports are live. I'm seeing tons of D donors.

Agree. That and she has loads of support from ACDC insiders.

Where can we look at the donors?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Campaign contributions are public, right? When do we get to find out who hated Miranda enough to pay for Angelo to stay in?

Should we go there? Maybe we should. While we're at it, let's see all the people who usually donate to Republicans now donating to Miranda. Can't Republicans run their own candidate instead of trying to slip one in under the radar through the Dem caucus process. Follow the money.

Yes, the (checks notes) Arlington Democrats Precinct Captain and Planned Parenthood volunteer is definitely a deep cover R candidate. You are nuts.

Campaign finance reports are live. I'm seeing tons of D donors.

Agree. That and she has loads of support from ACDC insiders.

I don’t know what is going on with this Angelo kid but the whole withdrawal tweet that disappeared is weird. My kids aren’t even in APS and now I feel like I have to drag myself out to vote bc this is so messed up.

I think misogyny is definitely playing a role in some of the anti-Miranda opinions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol, seriously? Reid Goldstein endorsed the child. Wow.

There are people that see him as the only viable option. And being on a school board in this day and age is a thankless job, so the competition is light.

+1

Based on what I've seen in posted videos, Reid's endorsement isn't going to age well. But the Stockton endorsement is a real coup for MT.

Are you kidding? No one knows who Stockton is, or cares about a rando from Maryland.

But keep trying to pretend it's a bigger deal than an endorsement from the current board chair. When are you people going to start taking Angelo seriously?

Brian Stockton was with APS. He's not a rando MoCo guy.

The people I know who are most keyed in definitely know who stockton is, had relationships with him and are definitely shocked about this endorsement. Good for her for getting it.

Agreed! I'm glad to see he wasn't really part of the closed-school cabal that Duran spearheaded. This is an important endorsement for Miranda showing that Stockton is in favor of a fresh approach that puts learning excellence back at the center of education and gets us away from all COVID-fear and fluffy diversity and inclusion initiatives.

So Miranda is going to fight against diversity and inclusion initiatives?

Still, crickets.

Based on what I've seen of Miranda on AEM, and in the Stockton endorsement, is that she will be focused on APS's awful achievement gaps. That should be the the focus of and goal of diversity and inclusion initiatives IMO.

You expect that she will discourage APS from "fluffy diversity and inclusion initiatives".

Miranda comes across as a no BS person who won't tolerate "fluffy" regardless of what it is modifying. But she demonstrates that she cares about seeing results from diversity and inclusion initiatives. I'm not sure what the PP meant about fluffy, but I know what I expect to see from this work and that's things like closing achievement gaps and disproportionate suspensions for starters.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Campaign contributions are public, right? When do we get to find out who hated Miranda enough to pay for Angelo to stay in?

Should we go there? Maybe we should. While we're at it, let's see all the people who usually donate to Republicans now donating to Miranda. Can't Republicans run their own candidate instead of trying to slip one in under the radar through the Dem caucus process. Follow the money.

Yes, the (checks notes) Arlington Democrats Precinct Captain and Planned Parenthood volunteer is definitely a deep cover R candidate. You are nuts.

Campaign finance reports are live. I'm seeing tons of D donors.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Campaign contributions are public, right? When do we get to find out who hated Miranda enough to pay for Angelo to stay in?

Should we go there? Maybe we should. While we're at it, let's see all the people who usually donate to Republicans now donating to Miranda. Can't Republicans run their own candidate instead of trying to slip one in under the radar through the Dem caucus process. Follow the money.

Yes, the (checks notes) Arlington Democrats Precinct Captain and Planned Parenthood volunteer is definitely a deep cover R candidate. You are nuts.