Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The trouble is that the schools haven’t improved. You could say there isn’t a sufficient critical mass, but that’s not it.
Many elementary schools in DC have improved because of gentrification.
It’s mainly the kids though. My kid went to an elementary school that “flipped” due to gentrification- the absolute best teachers there had been there for decades.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve heard gentrifying parents be referred to as “sacrificing their kid” if they send their kid to the local school.
There was a panel with the parents and kids who went from a very nice elementary to the assigned middle school in DC. Glowing reviews.
Kids were fabulous and allegedly didn’t experience much hardship (a bit of schoolyard bullying). I was initially very excited but a little put off by what seemed to be a school within a school (most of these kids didn’t have most classes with their peers who came from the other feeder schools because they were in advanced classes). We then happened to encounter a couple of the children at a party shortly thereafter. The parents didn’t say anything more, but the children told our DC that the experience was very mixed, that they were expected to portray a rosy picture of everyone getting along, and told them in no uncertain terms that it was a pretty rough ride and to stay away it at all possible. It’s a true story with no particular lesson. I remember being shocked at the time but realized there’s a ton of self censorship in the stories people tell today. Good to check and not to hear just what you want to hear. Confirmation bias is real and cuts both ways
This definitely happens. The omerta is real.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The trouble is that the schools haven’t improved. You could say there isn’t a sufficient critical mass, but that’s not it.
Many elementary schools in DC have improved because of gentrification.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve heard gentrifying parents be referred to as “sacrificing their kid” if they send their kid to the local school.
There was a panel with the parents and kids who went from a very nice elementary to the assigned middle school in DC. Glowing reviews.
Kids were fabulous and allegedly didn’t experience much hardship (a bit of schoolyard bullying). I was initially very excited but a little put off by what seemed to be a school within a school (most of these kids didn’t have most classes with their peers who came from the other feeder schools because they were in advanced classes). We then happened to encounter a couple of the children at a party shortly thereafter. The parents didn’t say anything more, but the children told our DC that the experience was very mixed, that they were expected to portray a rosy picture of everyone getting along, and told them in no uncertain terms that it was a pretty rough ride and to stay away it at all possible. It’s a true story with no particular lesson. I remember being shocked at the time but realized there’s a ton of self censorship in the stories people tell today. Good to check and not to hear just what you want to hear. Confirmation bias is real and cuts both ways
Anonymous wrote:The trouble is that the schools haven’t improved. You could say there isn’t a sufficient critical mass, but that’s not it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve heard gentrifying parents be referred to as “sacrificing their kid” if they send their kid to the local school.
There was a panel with the parents and kids who went from a very nice elementary to the assigned middle school in DC. Glowing reviews.
Kids were fabulous and allegedly didn’t experience much hardship (a bit of schoolyard bullying). I was initially very excited but a little put off by what seemed to be a school within a school (most of these kids didn’t have most classes with their peers who came from the other feeder schools because they were in advanced classes). We then happened to encounter a couple of the children at a party shortly thereafter. The parents didn’t say anything more, but the children told our DC that the experience was very mixed, that they were expected to portray a rosy picture of everyone getting along, and told them in no uncertain terms that it was a pretty rough ride and to stay away it at all possible. It’s a true story with no particular lesson. I remember being shocked at the time but realized there’s a ton of self censorship in the stories people tell today. Good to check and not to hear just what you want to hear. Confirmation bias is real and cuts both ways
There are a lot of rich people who didn't go to bad schools now forcing their kids to attend them to make some sort of point. I went to a terrible school that no one wanted to attend but had no other options and now I sacrifice to keep my kids away from that experience. There are no rosey pictures being around poverty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve heard gentrifying parents be referred to as “sacrificing their kid” if they send their kid to the local school.
There was a panel with the parents and kids who went from a very nice elementary to the assigned middle school in DC. Glowing reviews.
Kids were fabulous and allegedly didn’t experience much hardship (a bit of schoolyard bullying). I was initially very excited but a little put off by what seemed to be a school within a school (most of these kids didn’t have most classes with their peers who came from the other feeder schools because they were in advanced classes). We then happened to encounter a couple of the children at a party shortly thereafter. The parents didn’t say anything more, but the children told our DC that the experience was very mixed, that they were expected to portray a rosy picture of everyone getting along, and told them in no uncertain terms that it was a pretty rough ride and to stay away it at all possible. It’s a true story with no particular lesson. I remember being shocked at the time but realized there’s a ton of self censorship in the stories people tell today. Good to check and not to hear just what you want to hear. Confirmation bias is real and cuts both ways
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can play a role today. Did you protest today? Did you donate to a mutual aid organization?
People who protest gentrification are the one who wants everything be racially segregated.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve heard gentrifying parents be referred to as “sacrificing their kid” if they send their kid to the local school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bricking people
Sadly, some seriously nihilistic teens are indeed doing this to prevent gentrification. It is terrible that they have so much public sympathy rather than 1) their victims and 2) us parents trying very hard to stay in the middle class and hoping to see some return on our modest home investments in this city, or at least not see the neighborhoods we invested in become crapholes.
Oh come on. This isn't about "preventing gentrification." And even if it were, it all the more increases the calls for more policing and efforts to push them out.
On the contrary, it is about gentrification in every way. The teens who brick are 1) claiming "their" space and 2) expressing the "rage" being stoked by extremely irresponsible people who feed them inflammatory lines about how gentrifiers are invading "their" turf. Braining white people with bricks is literally their reaction to gentrification, and too many adults who should know better tell them they're justified if they want to kill or permanently disable their neighbors.
I don't know that they're thinking far enough ahead to realize there could eventually be backlash. They're mostly thinking nothing will happen to them even if they get caught.
Why is this not prosecuted as a hate crime?
It is barely prosecuted at all. That's our problem here in DC.
My investment advisor was bricked while walking with his wife on a week day around 1:30 in the afternoon. He was a couple of blocks from St Patrick's Cathedral in a good neighborhood. He was bricked so hard he thought something had fallen from the top of the building and he was seriously injured. He and his wife managed to walk a couple of blocks to where a cop was walking and managed to get the 'bricker" arrested. The "bricker was released in about 5 hours. Believe me, you don't want to be bricked.
My investment advisor was going to buy property in NYC but now he is not going to. He and his wife also avoid going to NYC now.
NYC isn’t “gentrifying” especially in that area. That’s an unfortunate incident but not really sure how it’s related to gentrification. Increase in crime and lawlessness in cities though, sure
And cops and prosecutors who allow someone who commits violent crimes to be back on the streets 5 hours later should be fired. Someone like that will just continue assaulting and assaulting and assaulting.