Anonymous wrote:
To these accusations:
“1. Kananaugh had other alleged victims.
2. His team knew about these allegations and poisoned the media landscape with narratives undermining his accusers.” one can only say “duh.” There were very deep pockets pushing Brett. He’d been their good little foot soldier and was being rewarded with a higher rank. It didn’t really matter what he did.
As a nation we weren’t even given the favor of a real investigation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Confirmation hearings. If proved that he lied during these hearings, then he can be impeached. Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.
https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/
And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted? Because I believe that is much more likely.
Ford clearly lied. I watched her testimony and she showed all signs of lying.
Are you a forensic psychiatrist? If so I’d love to hear more. If not then you are a fool for posting this.
Cute.
No, I'm not a "forensic psychiatrist" but someone trained in a much more relevant discipline.
Ford was clearly lying. She was making things up about her lie-detector test -- it was obvious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the loser Republicans on this thread are so predictable in their misogyny and simultaneous fear of the fact that she was a reliable witness.
And she’s not even the point of Brett Kavanaugh. The point is that he is unfit for the bench in temperament and in his total and complete lack of honor. The other point is that the GOP is corrupt and corrupts everything they touch. They are unfit.
Ahem I'm reading much from loser Dems on this thread.
We have a great SCOTUS in place.
+1
And it's Democrats who would love for SCOTUS to act as their own personal legislature.
Perfect example of how every GOP accusation is a confession.
It is the GOP and its supporters who have put in place the most activist, most illegitimate Supreme Court.
We see right through you. And you don't like it. You want us all to be as gullible as your supporters.
Nope. Democrats would love nothing more than their own personal SCOTUS, used to rubberstamp liberal legislation. Hint: that's not the purpose of SCOTUS. It exists to determine whether laws are constitutional or not - it does not make laws. And it certainly isn't a wing of the Democratic party. Sorry to disappoint.
DP
Oh that’s right only republicans get their group of personal SCOTUS to rubber stamp their radical policies.
Sorry, sending something back to the states to decide because it's not covered in the Constitution is hardly "rubber stamping" anything... but do go on.
It does. Especially when every right wing hack lied about what they’d do. “Settled law,” they said. “Respecting precedent,” they said.
They lied, POSs cover for them now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Confirmation hearings. If proved that he lied during these hearings, then he can be impeached. Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.
https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/
And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted? Because I believe that is much more likely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the loser Republicans on this thread are so predictable in their misogyny and simultaneous fear of the fact that she was a reliable witness.
And she’s not even the point of Brett Kavanaugh. The point is that he is unfit for the bench in temperament and in his total and complete lack of honor. The other point is that the GOP is corrupt and corrupts everything they touch. They are unfit.
Ahem I'm reading much from loser Dems on this thread.
We have a great SCOTUS in place.
+1
And it's Democrats who would love for SCOTUS to act as their own personal legislature.
Perfect example of how every GOP accusation is a confession.
It is the GOP and its supporters who have put in place the most activist, most illegitimate Supreme Court.
We see right through you. And you don't like it. You want us all to be as gullible as your supporters.
Anonymous wrote:Here it is. Read it and cheer or read it and weep. Calls for DOJ to investigate whether BK knowingly committed perjury.
https://l.smartnews.com/PtGtY/VRGFsI
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the loser Republicans on this thread are so predictable in their misogyny and simultaneous fear of the fact that she was a reliable witness.
And she’s not even the point of Brett Kavanaugh. The point is that he is unfit for the bench in temperament and in his total and complete lack of honor. The other point is that the GOP is corrupt and corrupts everything they touch. They are unfit.
Ahem I'm reading much from loser Dems on this thread.
We have a great SCOTUS in place.
+1
And it's Democrats who would love for SCOTUS to act as their own personal legislature.
Perfect example of how every GOP accusation is a confession.
It is the GOP and its supporters who have put in place the most activist, most illegitimate Supreme Court.
We see right through you. And you don't like it. You want us all to be as gullible as your supporters.
Nope. Democrats would love nothing more than their own personal SCOTUS, used to rubberstamp liberal legislation. Hint: that's not the purpose of SCOTUS. It exists to determine whether laws are constitutional or not - it does not make laws. And it certainly isn't a wing of the Democratic party. Sorry to disappoint.
DP
Your "nope" is meaningless in the face of the reality of what this SCOTUS is doing.
This SCOTUS is BS; just there to be activist judges for the GOP. They are stomping all over precedent in order to rubberstamp the awful policies of the GOP.
Every accusation is a confession.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the loser Republicans on this thread are so predictable in their misogyny and simultaneous fear of the fact that she was a reliable witness.
And she’s not even the point of Brett Kavanaugh. The point is that he is unfit for the bench in temperament and in his total and complete lack of honor. The other point is that the GOP is corrupt and corrupts everything they touch. They are unfit.
Ahem I'm reading much from loser Dems on this thread.
We have a great SCOTUS in place.
+1
And it's Democrats who would love for SCOTUS to act as their own personal legislature.
Perfect example of how every GOP accusation is a confession.
It is the GOP and its supporters who have put in place the most activist, most illegitimate Supreme Court.
We see right through you. And you don't like it. You want us all to be as gullible as your supporters.
Nope. Democrats would love nothing more than their own personal SCOTUS, used to rubberstamp liberal legislation. Hint: that's not the purpose of SCOTUS. It exists to determine whether laws are constitutional or not - it does not make laws. And it certainly isn't a wing of the Democratic party. Sorry to disappoint.
DP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the loser Republicans on this thread are so predictable in their misogyny and simultaneous fear of the fact that she was a reliable witness.
And she’s not even the point of Brett Kavanaugh. The point is that he is unfit for the bench in temperament and in his total and complete lack of honor. The other point is that the GOP is corrupt and corrupts everything they touch. They are unfit.
Ahem I'm reading much from loser Dems on this thread.
We have a great SCOTUS in place.
+1
And it's Democrats who would love for SCOTUS to act as their own personal legislature.
Perfect example of how every GOP accusation is a confession.
It is the GOP and its supporters who have put in place the most activist, most illegitimate Supreme Court.
We see right through you. And you don't like it. You want us all to be as gullible as your supporters.
Nope. Democrats would love nothing more than their own personal SCOTUS, used to rubberstamp liberal legislation. Hint: that's not the purpose of SCOTUS. It exists to determine whether laws are constitutional or not - it does not make laws. And it certainly isn't a wing of the Democratic party. Sorry to disappoint.
DP
Oh that’s right only republicans get their group of personal SCOTUS to rubber stamp their radical policies.
Sorry, sending something back to the states to decide because it's not covered in the Constitution is hardly "rubber stamping" anything... but do go on.
It does. Especially when every right wing hack lied about what they’d do. “Settled law,” they said. “Respecting precedent,” they said.
They lied, POSs cover for them now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the loser Republicans on this thread are so predictable in their misogyny and simultaneous fear of the fact that she was a reliable witness.
And she’s not even the point of Brett Kavanaugh. The point is that he is unfit for the bench in temperament and in his total and complete lack of honor. The other point is that the GOP is corrupt and corrupts everything they touch. They are unfit.
Ahem I'm reading much from loser Dems on this thread.
We have a great SCOTUS in place.
+1
And it's Democrats who would love for SCOTUS to act as their own personal legislature.
Perfect example of how every GOP accusation is a confession.
It is the GOP and its supporters who have put in place the most activist, most illegitimate Supreme Court.
We see right through you. And you don't like it. You want us all to be as gullible as your supporters.
Nope. Democrats would love nothing more than their own personal SCOTUS, used to rubberstamp liberal legislation. Hint: that's not the purpose of SCOTUS. It exists to determine whether laws are constitutional or not - it does not make laws. And it certainly isn't a wing of the Democratic party. Sorry to disappoint.
DP
Oh that’s right only republicans get their group of personal SCOTUS to rubber stamp their radical policies.
Sorry, sending something back to the states to decide because it's not covered in the Constitution is hardly "rubber stamping" anything... but do go on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the loser Republicans on this thread are so predictable in their misogyny and simultaneous fear of the fact that she was a reliable witness.
And she’s not even the point of Brett Kavanaugh. The point is that he is unfit for the bench in temperament and in his total and complete lack of honor. The other point is that the GOP is corrupt and corrupts everything they touch. They are unfit.
Ahem I'm reading much from loser Dems on this thread.
We have a great SCOTUS in place.
+1
And it's Democrats who would love for SCOTUS to act as their own personal legislature.
Perfect example of how every GOP accusation is a confession.
It is the GOP and its supporters who have put in place the most activist, most illegitimate Supreme Court.
We see right through you. And you don't like it. You want us all to be as gullible as your supporters.
Nope. Democrats would love nothing more than their own personal SCOTUS, used to rubberstamp liberal legislation. Hint: that's not the purpose of SCOTUS. It exists to determine whether laws are constitutional or not - it does not make laws. And it certainly isn't a wing of the Democratic party. Sorry to disappoint.
DP
Oh that’s right only republicans get their group of personal SCOTUS to rubber stamp their radical policies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Confirmation hearings. If proved that he lied during these hearings, then he can be impeached. Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.
https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/
And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted? Because I believe that is much more likely.
Ford clearly lied. I watched her testimony and she showed all signs of lying.
Are you a forensic psychiatrist? If so I’d love to hear more. If not then you are a fool for posting this.
Cute.
No, I'm not a "forensic psychiatrist" but someone trained in a much more relevant discipline.
Ford was clearly lying. She was making things up about her lie-detector test -- it was obvious.
I’m very interested in what that relevant discipline is and what signs you saw.
Won't share the discipline but here is something that was a red flag to me and colleagues.
At some point Ford said that she had taken a lie detector test the very same day her grandma (or mother?) had died. The interviewer then interrupted to doublecheck if that was the case, because you should never take such a test in such an emotional moment, it screws the baseline and the results.
Ford realized that her previous testimony made no sense and improvised something like "Uh I'm not sure, might have been a day before or after the funeral"
Which makes even less sense. Attending your grandma's funeral is one of those moments you remember vividly, and if you took a lie detector test in some office that same day you'd remember it. And if you say it was that day you don't just make things up and then say it might have been a day before or later.
My brother died when I was 28. I went to his funeral and I do know the month but have no idea of the actual date.
You probably also think that Anita Hill lied
It's not about the actual date. You would remember if you did something else major the same day.
Exactly. Especially if it happened less than a year ago and you had spent weeks training your testimony with multiple lawyers (all helpfully provided by the Democratic Party).
Ford was an obvious fraud.
Even with her trained testimony she came off as being unhinged. She was a hot mess and had a crazed look in her eyes. Definitely not a credible witness to everyone except hard core dems.
Yes BK did come across as unhinged. Dod you see all those faces he made? Way too emotional and overly dramatic. Clearly staged. He is such a liar.
I'm going to accuse you of sexual assault. I expect you to remain calm and poised while I do so, televised in front of millions, even if you know you're innocent. Let's see how that goes.
DP
I can think of quite a few instances where similar situations happened where someone was accused, rightly, or wrongly, and did not become as unhinged over it as Kavanaugh did.
Really? Similar situation as in, was falsely accused and then had to immediately be televised while refuting said allegations? Do tell. Examples please.
Sociopaths are very good at keeping calm in situations such as this. They are practiced. Ted Bundy was able to sit on a rape hotline and discuss his own murders with a detective friend he met there.
Yes. Which is why Kavanaugh very clearly is no sociopath. He reacted the way any human being falsely accused would act. Upset.
He acted the way my ex did when I accused him of having an affair. How DARE I accuse him???
Of course, he was cheating the whole time.
Kavanaugh's anger could have been based more in "who the heck do you think you are to question ME, accuse ME, interefere in my appointment, publicly humiliate ME? And not in whether or not Ford's accusastions happened.
I remember Bill Clinton seemed pretty angry about being accused on ML. We all know how that turned out.
Sorry, but if you falsely accuse me of sexual assault (or anything), I'm going to be very upset and have no problem showing it. Especially if I have to defend myself in front of the entire world.![]()
Kavanaugh's behavior was not that of a mature adult. Especially during what was a job interview. He demonstrated himself to be completely unfit to serve. It seems you would not be a candidate I'd want to hire, either.