Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm really surprised he has the authority to do this via executive order. Not just the debt cancellation but also reducing IBR programs from 20 to 10 years and reducing the percentage of discretionary income paid towards loans from 10% to 5%.
I imagine this will be tied up in court for quite some time.
Who is going to sue over this and on what grounds?
PP here and the grounds would be that the action exceeds his authority under the statute. No idea who will sue, there's usually a special interest group that runs these lawsuits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm really surprised he has the authority to do this via executive order. Not just the debt cancellation but also reducing IBR programs from 20 to 10 years and reducing the percentage of discretionary income paid towards loans from 10% to 5%.
I imagine this will be tied up in court for quite some time.
Who is going to sue over this and on what grounds?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He lost my vote. I know I am only one vote but still
He campaigned on this - why did you vote for him in the first place? You sound like a republican shocked that a republican politician actually voted to ban abortion
Anonymous wrote:He lost my vote. I know I am only one vote but still
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm really surprised he has the authority to do this via executive order. Not just the debt cancellation but also reducing IBR programs from 20 to 10 years and reducing the percentage of discretionary income paid towards loans from 10% to 5%.
I imagine this will be tied up in court for quite some time.
Who is going to sue over this and on what grounds?
People relying on it should be more concerned about the next president changing the rules back
What rules? It's forgiven. The next president can't just reinstate the debt.
Anonymous wrote:I’m regretting working FT through college so that I wouldn’t have to take on debt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm really surprised he has the authority to do this via executive order. Not just the debt cancellation but also reducing IBR programs from 20 to 10 years and reducing the percentage of discretionary income paid towards loans from 10% to 5%.
I imagine this will be tied up in court for quite some time.
Who is going to sue over this and on what grounds?
People relying on it should be more concerned about the next president changing the rules back
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm really surprised he has the authority to do this via executive order. Not just the debt cancellation but also reducing IBR programs from 20 to 10 years and reducing the percentage of discretionary income paid towards loans from 10% to 5%.
I imagine this will be tied up in court for quite some time.
Who is going to sue over this and on what grounds?
Anonymous wrote:I'm really surprised he has the authority to do this via executive order. Not just the debt cancellation but also reducing IBR programs from 20 to 10 years and reducing the percentage of discretionary income paid towards loans from 10% to 5%.
I imagine this will be tied up in court for quite some time.
Anonymous wrote:I paid my loans back like a responsible adult. Everyone else can do the same.
So much ahole entitlement mentality these days. This country is going down the toilet.
First it is $10k. Then they'll demand $20k. Then it's $40k. When does it end? What does forgiveness actually do to control costs of college? 5 years from now when you have another generation of whiny ass borrowers, what's going to stop them from demanding another round of forgiveness?
It never ends. Why don't you forgive my mortgage while you are at it? People who didn't take out loans or who paid their back also deserve something.
Anonymous wrote:Up to $125,000 singles or $250,000/for couples is way, way too high.
What a joke.