Anonymous wrote:The labor scene was too drawn out for me. Seems never delivered the afterbirth (rarely done in shows…but annoys me.)
How could she have literally torn a man apart with no regret and then helped Serena, who was awful to her? And not just awhile ago. Serena used Hannah at the ceremony that was teen used to send a message to June. Not realistic at all.
Then…Wasn’t Selena’s driver wearing a bullet proof vest? Why didn’t we see what was happening as he survived?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Esther was demoted to Handmaid as punishment for helping the escaped Handmaids and poisoning the Commanders. If her husband had died of natural causes and none of that had ever happened, I think she would’ve been reassigned as a Wife. I’m not sure how Wives are chosen initially.Anonymous wrote:How is a wife determined? Are they infertile? It doesn’t make sense that Esther was a wife (and fertile) but then demoted to Handmaiden.
Whoever earlier said Esther was raped, I totally missed it.
All I know is they have to be "virtuous"--no affairs, divorces, questionable occupations etc. But not sure how they distinguish between commander's wives and econowives, who may or may not be fertile.
Yeah, I'd like to know because we've seen a couple/few Marthas that were fairly young - Beth and Sienna. Why wouldn't they be Wives?
Their ethnicity?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There have been many times in the series when June and Serena have friendly moments. It’s always been a one step forward, two steps back thing with them.Anonymous wrote:I really liked this episode and would consider one of the best of the series BUT
BUT BUT BUT BUT
Did we get in a time machine and travel back to an alternate Gilead where Serena and June's backstory was one of mutual understanding and dare I say, friendship? Because I truly enjoyed the Serena who showed up to the birth party, humbly apologized for being late, awkwardly introduced June, who shared side glances with June, rolling her eyes at the wife's fake birth machinations, and then stood apart from the other wives to exchange a look to commiserate with June when the Handmaid died in childbirth? That was a great story.
But it's not the story/history of Serena and June.
I think it would have been brilliant to have a reveal in the flashback that the Handmaid with Serena wasn't June, but the Waterford's first Handmaid. It would have gone at least part of the way to develop Serena's character into the woman who did monstrous things in pursuit of a baby of her own after a Hamdmaid she considered something of a friend betrayed her and then killed herself.
Anyhoo, I did think the scenes between Serena and June in this episode were really well done and very touching. The redemptive-ish arc for both of them was nicely done. It will be interesting to see Serena now put in a position to desperately want to get her child back.
This. And I think those scenes with the dead handmaid during childbirth were not new. They aired in an earlier season.
No. This was totally new.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There have been many times in the series when June and Serena have friendly moments. It’s always been a one step forward, two steps back thing with them.Anonymous wrote:I really liked this episode and would consider one of the best of the series BUT
BUT BUT BUT BUT
Did we get in a time machine and travel back to an alternate Gilead where Serena and June's backstory was one of mutual understanding and dare I say, friendship? Because I truly enjoyed the Serena who showed up to the birth party, humbly apologized for being late, awkwardly introduced June, who shared side glances with June, rolling her eyes at the wife's fake birth machinations, and then stood apart from the other wives to exchange a look to commiserate with June when the Handmaid died in childbirth? That was a great story.
But it's not the story/history of Serena and June.
I think it would have been brilliant to have a reveal in the flashback that the Handmaid with Serena wasn't June, but the Waterford's first Handmaid. It would have gone at least part of the way to develop Serena's character into the woman who did monstrous things in pursuit of a baby of her own after a Hamdmaid she considered something of a friend betrayed her and then killed herself.
Anyhoo, I did think the scenes between Serena and June in this episode were really well done and very touching. The redemptive-ish arc for both of them was nicely done. It will be interesting to see Serena now put in a position to desperately want to get her child back.
This. And I think those scenes with the dead handmaid during childbirth were not new. They aired in an earlier season.
Anonymous wrote:Ethnicity doesn’t play into the universe of the handmaids tale. It’s mentioned a few times “that commander doesn’t want a handmaid of color” but probably because he and his wife wanted to maintain the cognitive dissonance that it is their child, not necessarily racist.
As a WOC, it’s hard to believe that a racist regime wouldn’t be racist but I think taking that layer out gives a breath of fresh air. I for one, at sick of seeing black people playing roles of slaves, maids and thugs. Even though the commanders and wives are the villains of the story, having a society where poc are not just relegated to “lower class” is refreshing.
Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't Serena's former gunshot wound to the abdomen have caused her a bit more complications during her pregnancy and childbirth?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Esther was demoted to Handmaid as punishment for helping the escaped Handmaids and poisoning the Commanders. If her husband had died of natural causes and none of that had ever happened, I think she would’ve been reassigned as a Wife. I’m not sure how Wives are chosen initially.Anonymous wrote:How is a wife determined? Are they infertile? It doesn’t make sense that Esther was a wife (and fertile) but then demoted to Handmaiden.
Whoever earlier said Esther was raped, I totally missed it.
All I know is they have to be "virtuous"--no affairs, divorces, questionable occupations etc. But not sure how they distinguish between commander's wives and econowives, who may or may not be fertile.
Yeah, I'd like to know because we've seen a couple/few Marthas that were fairly young - Beth and Sienna. Why wouldn't they be Wives?
Their ethnicity?
Beth and sienna are likely infertile. There must be a test for it because we saw the young girls at the hospital having their fertility tested. Additionally, Esther hasn’t had a baby, and she is a handmaid.
Beth was white. Sienna was presumably South Asian. We've seen black Commanders and black wives, so that doesn't make sense to me. I suppose it's possible there was a test for infertility, but I don't recall it ever being mentioned. And every Handmaid with any backstory had a child - Janine, Alma, Moira, Emily, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Esther was demoted to Handmaid as punishment for helping the escaped Handmaids and poisoning the Commanders. If her husband had died of natural causes and none of that had ever happened, I think she would’ve been reassigned as a Wife. I’m not sure how Wives are chosen initially.Anonymous wrote:How is a wife determined? Are they infertile? It doesn’t make sense that Esther was a wife (and fertile) but then demoted to Handmaiden.
Whoever earlier said Esther was raped, I totally missed it.
All I know is they have to be "virtuous"--no affairs, divorces, questionable occupations etc. But not sure how they distinguish between commander's wives and econowives, who may or may not be fertile.
Yeah, I'd like to know because we've seen a couple/few Marthas that were fairly young - Beth and Sienna. Why wouldn't they be Wives?
Their ethnicity?
Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't Serena's former gunshot wound to the abdomen have caused her a bit more complications during her pregnancy and childbirth?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There have been many times in the series when June and Serena have friendly moments. It’s always been a one step forward, two steps back thing with them.Anonymous wrote:I really liked this episode and would consider one of the best of the series BUT
BUT BUT BUT BUT
Did we get in a time machine and travel back to an alternate Gilead where Serena and June's backstory was one of mutual understanding and dare I say, friendship? Because I truly enjoyed the Serena who showed up to the birth party, humbly apologized for being late, awkwardly introduced June, who shared side glances with June, rolling her eyes at the wife's fake birth machinations, and then stood apart from the other wives to exchange a look to commiserate with June when the Handmaid died in childbirth? That was a great story.
But it's not the story/history of Serena and June.
I think it would have been brilliant to have a reveal in the flashback that the Handmaid with Serena wasn't June, but the Waterford's first Handmaid. It would have gone at least part of the way to develop Serena's character into the woman who did monstrous things in pursuit of a baby of her own after a Hamdmaid she considered something of a friend betrayed her and then killed herself.
Anyhoo, I did think the scenes between Serena and June in this episode were really well done and very touching. The redemptive-ish arc for both of them was nicely done. It will be interesting to see Serena now put in a position to desperately want to get her child back.
Was going to say exactly this. She often got some perks from Serena as I recall. Didn’t they bond a bit during Serena’s gardening days?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Esther was demoted to Handmaid as punishment for helping the escaped Handmaids and poisoning the Commanders. If her husband had died of natural causes and none of that had ever happened, I think she would’ve been reassigned as a Wife. I’m not sure how Wives are chosen initially.Anonymous wrote:How is a wife determined? Are they infertile? It doesn’t make sense that Esther was a wife (and fertile) but then demoted to Handmaiden.
Whoever earlier said Esther was raped, I totally missed it.
All I know is they have to be "virtuous"--no affairs, divorces, questionable occupations etc. But not sure how they distinguish between commander's wives and econowives, who may or may not be fertile.
Yeah, I'd like to know because we've seen a couple/few Marthas that were fairly young - Beth and Sienna. Why wouldn't they be Wives?