Anonymous wrote:
Libs say they want in-depth background checks and waiting periods for guns, right ? Yes or no?
If yes, then all the people applying for MD permits will be subject to VERY in-depth background checks (I’m doing it in MD right now. Requires photo, 8 hours classroom training, range training, a demonstration of proficiency test, a firearm laws test, fingerprints, 3 non-family references and a application fee. Wait time is currently 90-120 days)
So that’s basically what libs want for guns, right? This is the exact stuff they say should be required for a gun. And that’s what everyone applying for a MD permit is doing.
But NOW it’s not good enough. Now it’s a problem. All the stuff you all said you wanted in the past, isn’t enough now.
Please explain why the goalposts have wheels on them.
Anonymous wrote:If it wasn’t with guns it would be with a truck like in Waukesha
The problem is that 35% of boys from 18-30 are sexless virgins and rising rapidly. A society full of angry frustrated young men will burn it all down
Anonymous wrote:
Libs say they want in-depth background checks and waiting periods for guns, right ? Yes or no?
If yes, then all the people applying for MD permits will be subject to VERY in-depth background checks (I’m doing it in MD right now. Requires photo, 8 hours classroom training, range training, a demonstration of proficiency test, a firearm laws test, fingerprints, 3 non-family references and a application fee. Wait time is currently 90-120 days)
So that’s basically what libs want for guns, right? This is the exact stuff they say should be required for a gun. And that’s what everyone applying for a MD permit is doing.
But NOW it’s not good enough. Now it’s a problem. All the stuff you all said you wanted in the past, isn’t enough now.
Please explain why the goalposts have wheels on them.
Anonymous wrote:
Libs say they want in-depth background checks and waiting periods for guns, right ? Yes or no?
If yes, then all the people applying for MD permits will be subject to VERY in-depth background checks (I’m doing it in MD right now. Requires photo, 8 hours classroom training, range training, a demonstration of proficiency test, a firearm laws test, fingerprints, 3 non-family references and a application fee. Wait time is currently 90-120 days)
So that’s basically what libs want for guns, right? This is the exact stuff they say should be required for a gun. And that’s what everyone applying for a MD permit is doing.
But NOW it’s not good enough. Now it’s a problem. All the stuff you all said you wanted in the past, isn’t enough now.
Please explain why the goalposts have wheels on them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People need to understand: the GOP wants you to be surrounded by guns and fearful of your fellow citizens. It's much easier to control the country if you cannot enjoy a parade, a public event, your church, or any other community institution where you meet and interact with others in the community. They want you atomized at home, in a gated community, with a bunch of guns in your closet and bars on your windows listening to their media.
High powered guns that rapidly kill on the streets of this country is EXACTLY PART OF THEIR PLAN. The more gun crimes and chaos, the better it is for Republicans to enact their goals and policies.
Also, the school shootings are all part of the Republicans' plans to end public schools. As more people get scared and pull their kids out, the school systems - particularly in Red States - will collapse. They want to force mothers to stay at-home and do home schooling. This will just keep successive generations poor and uneducated.
It's all part of the game and you didn't even realized you're already on the playing field.
Definitely true. The Federalist, a well known right wing site, had an article up right after Uvalde about how homeschooling was the answer to school shootings. When the Republicans establish “competitive autocracy,” they might pass a wage subsidy for single income households with children. Incentivize women leaving the workforce. Keep women from accessing effective BC by calling them abortifacients. They’ve been perfectly open about their goals. It’s on their websites! It’s a matter of how far they go, not whether we go there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think you have it quite right. The left doesn't want any of the shooters to have easy access to weapons, so they want to ban the weapons. Whereas I would be happy to see these "known to police" types appearing on the NICS so that they cannot legally purchase the weapons.Anonymous wrote:The politics of all the shootings is this: the left didn’t want any of the shooters to have easy access to weapons; the right did. You arm delusional people. This is the effect of your cause.
Republicans made it harder to deny guns to delusional people. They have done nothing.
+1 That’s literally THE FIRST THING THEY DID with their 2017 trifecta.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna727221
Don't need to go that far, just look at Hogan's action (prior page) a day after a mass shooting. Vicious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People need to understand: the GOP wants you to be surrounded by guns and fearful of your fellow citizens. It's much easier to control the country if you cannot enjoy a parade, a public event, your church, or any other community institution where you meet and interact with others in the community. They want you atomized at home, in a gated community, with a bunch of guns in your closet and bars on your windows listening to their media.
High powered guns that rapidly kill on the streets of this country is EXACTLY PART OF THEIR PLAN. The more gun crimes and chaos, the better it is for Republicans to enact their goals and policies.
Also, the school shootings are all part of the Republican's plans to end public schools. As more people get scared and pull their kids out, the school systems - particularly in Red States - will collapse. They want to force mothers to stay at-home and do home schooling. This will just keep successive generations poor and uneducated.
It's all part of the game and you didn't even realized you're already on the playing field.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think you have it quite right. The left doesn't want any of the shooters to have easy access to weapons, so they want to ban the weapons. Whereas I would be happy to see these "known to police" types appearing on the NICS so that they cannot legally purchase the weapons.Anonymous wrote:The politics of all the shootings is this: the left didn’t want any of the shooters to have easy access to weapons; the right did. You arm delusional people. This is the effect of your cause.
Republicans made it harder to deny guns to delusional people. They have done nothing.
+1 That’s literally THE FIRST THING THEY DID with their 2017 trifecta.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna727221
Anonymous wrote:Why aren't more police forces actively speaking out against these stupid gun laws that make them less safe?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think you have it quite right. The left doesn't want any of the shooters to have easy access to weapons, so they want to ban the weapons. Whereas I would be happy to see these "known to police" types appearing on the NICS so that they cannot legally purchase the weapons.Anonymous wrote:The politics of all the shootings is this: the left didn’t want any of the shooters to have easy access to weapons; the right did. You arm delusional people. This is the effect of your cause.
Republicans made it harder to deny guns to delusional people. They have done nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think you have it quite right. The left doesn't want any of the shooters to have easy access to weapons, so they want to ban the weapons. Whereas I would be happy to see these "known to police" types appearing on the NICS so that they cannot legally purchase the weapons.Anonymous wrote:The politics of all the shootings is this: the left didn’t want any of the shooters to have easy access to weapons; the right did. You arm delusional people. This is the effect of your cause.
Republicans made it harder to deny guns to delusional people. They have done nothing.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think you have it quite right. The left doesn't want any of the shooters to have easy access to weapons, so they want to ban the weapons. Whereas I would be happy to see these "known to police" types appearing on the NICS so that they cannot legally purchase the weapons.Anonymous wrote:The politics of all the shootings is this: the left didn’t want any of the shooters to have easy access to weapons; the right did. You arm delusional people. This is the effect of your cause.