Anonymous
Post 11/02/2023 18:16     Subject: Re:Democratic scandals

Anonymous wrote:


Transition not looking so goodđź‘€
Anonymous
Post 11/02/2023 18:07     Subject: Re:Democratic scandals

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More voting fraud.... Bridgeport, Connecticut.




Huge. This case will be referenced when it keeps happening in other states.


Court decision: https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=26199518
Anonymous
Post 11/02/2023 18:05     Subject: Re:Democratic scandals

Anonymous wrote:More voting fraud.... Bridgeport, Connecticut.




I guess democrats didn't get their own memo on "Democracy". I wonder why they are lecturing everyone else on it? Hmmm. Why could that be?
Anonymous
Post 11/02/2023 14:12     Subject: Re:Democratic scandals

Anonymous
Post 11/02/2023 13:24     Subject: Democratic scandals

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I guess that explains why Trump keeps losing in Connecticut.


Nice try on whataboutism.

This story is about DEMOCRATS who committed voter fraud.

I'm not sure why I need to explain this but...I was putting forth the possibility that Trump lost in Connecticut due to DEMOCRAT fraud.
Anonymous
Post 11/02/2023 12:59     Subject: Democratic scandals

Anonymous wrote:I guess that explains why Trump keeps losing in Connecticut.


Nice try on whataboutism.

This story is about DEMOCRATS who committed voter fraud.
Anonymous
Post 11/02/2023 09:15     Subject: Democratic scandals

Anonymous wrote:I guess that explains why Trump keeps losing in Connecticut.


Anonymous
Post 11/02/2023 08:33     Subject: Democratic scandals

I guess that explains why Trump keeps losing in Connecticut.
Anonymous
Post 11/02/2023 08:22     Subject: Re:Democratic scandals

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More voting fraud.... Bridgeport, Connecticut.




Huge. This case will be referenced when it keeps happening in other states.


Wanna bet that it won't be?
Anonymous
Post 11/02/2023 07:32     Subject: Re:Democratic scandals

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More voting fraud.... Bridgeport, Connecticut.




Huge. This case will be referenced when it keeps happening in other states.


There was evidently 900 more absentee ballots than the number of absentee voters on record.
Insane.
Anonymous
Post 11/02/2023 07:22     Subject: Re:Democratic scandals

Anonymous wrote:More voting fraud.... Bridgeport, Connecticut.




Huge. This case will be referenced when it keeps happening in other states.
Anonymous
Post 11/02/2023 07:02     Subject: Re:Democratic scandals

More voting fraud.... Bridgeport, Connecticut.


Anonymous
Post 11/01/2023 17:07     Subject: Re:Democratic scandals

Anonymous wrote:The earmarks Adam Schiff delivered for donors

Politico, Christopher Cadelago, September 25, 2023

Adam Schiff is unapologetically touting his commitment to earmarks for local causes — like homelessness and drug treatment programs — as he seeks the Senate seat long held by Dianne Feinstein. The 12-term House Democrat and darling of the anti-Trump left is even calling out his closest rival in the race, Rep. Katie Porter, for her opposition to pork-barrel spending.

But Schiff has offered an incomplete and potentially misleading account of his record on earmarks. A close examination of that record reveals that he secured generous earmarks for corporate beneficiaries early in his career, including at times for recipients who were also major donors to his political campaigns.

Earmarks have emerged as an unlikely source of intense debate in one of the nation’s most closely watched Senate primaries. Schiff’s sales pitch — that earmarks are essential to making Washington work for California — hearkens back to his early days in the House, before both parties raced to crack down on the practice. Porter said she views the spending items as a symbol of broken Washington and doesn’t file requests for them.

A POLITICO review of congressional earmarks and political contributions found that in addition to the money for homelessness and drug treatment, Schiff also steered millions to for-profit companies and raised tens of thousands for his House reelection campaigns from corporate executives and people connected to them. The review was mostly limited to publicly available data from the brief three-year window when corporate earmarks were disclosed.

Schiff said he doesn’t have a complete accounting of his earmarks.

The story continues....

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/25/adam-schiff-earmarks-00117716

https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/earmarks?cid=N00009585&cycle=2022&fy=FY08&name=adam-schiff



Perfectly legal. If you don't like it, change the law.

Hint: GOP is a thousand times worse
Anonymous
Post 11/01/2023 16:38     Subject: Re:Democratic scandals



NEW: Multiple New Jersey Democrats have been charged with election fraud crimes involving mail in ballots.

Paterson City Council President Alex Mendez was indicted for alleged crimes committed during the 2020 election.

Mendez allegedly supervised an operation that stole mail in ballots from mailboxes and replaced the ones that were not for him.

His wife and two others were also charged.

New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin says Mendez was seen emptying a “large, heavy bag, completely filled with ballots” into a mailbox.

“The defendants are accused of attempting to rig an election in their favor and to deprive the voters of Paterson of having their voices heard,” Platkin said.

“The functioning of democracy relies on voters’ trust that their votes count and those votes determine the outcomes of elections.”

Mendez was able to commit this alleged fraud due to the fact that all ballots were mail-in thanks to the pandemic.

The photos below show Mendez with high profile Democrats including Bill Clinton, Cory Booker and Whoopi Goldberg.

I thought mail-in-ballots were safe and secure?
Anonymous
Post 09/25/2023 19:51     Subject: Re:Democratic scandals

The earmarks Adam Schiff delivered for donors

Politico, Christopher Cadelago, September 25, 2023

Adam Schiff is unapologetically touting his commitment to earmarks for local causes — like homelessness and drug treatment programs — as he seeks the Senate seat long held by Dianne Feinstein. The 12-term House Democrat and darling of the anti-Trump left is even calling out his closest rival in the race, Rep. Katie Porter, for her opposition to pork-barrel spending.

But Schiff has offered an incomplete and potentially misleading account of his record on earmarks. A close examination of that record reveals that he secured generous earmarks for corporate beneficiaries early in his career, including at times for recipients who were also major donors to his political campaigns.

Earmarks have emerged as an unlikely source of intense debate in one of the nation’s most closely watched Senate primaries. Schiff’s sales pitch — that earmarks are essential to making Washington work for California — hearkens back to his early days in the House, before both parties raced to crack down on the practice. Porter said she views the spending items as a symbol of broken Washington and doesn’t file requests for them.

A POLITICO review of congressional earmarks and political contributions found that in addition to the money for homelessness and drug treatment, Schiff also steered millions to for-profit companies and raised tens of thousands for his House reelection campaigns from corporate executives and people connected to them. The review was mostly limited to publicly available data from the brief three-year window when corporate earmarks were disclosed.

Schiff said he doesn’t have a complete accounting of his earmarks.

The story continues....

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/25/adam-schiff-earmarks-00117716

https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/earmarks?cid=N00009585&cycle=2022&fy=FY08&name=adam-schiff