Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:London papers report Londoners are split about the Queen's decision on Camilla.
Well no shit. Queen Ho is not something people are just going to 'get used to' because Charles whined about it. I look forward to the rumblings growing louder. Especially since the public just found out that this announcement has been in the works for FIVE YEARS while Charles was tut-tutting and protesting he wasn't even thinking about it the whole time.![]()
![]()
Camilla probably doesn't give a royal sh*t if she becomes the Queen Consort. The Queen and the Firm probably care because they want to introduce a commoner-- albeit one with a bit of a royal pedigree--into the line before the bog standard commoner, Kate Middleton, becomes Queen Consort to William.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if they will give back the Elgin Marbles and the Koh-i-Noor diamond. British people used to be such savages.
You do understand that the Elgin Marbles were made by slave labor and the Koh--Noor diamond was mined by slave labor. Don't get all sniffy on the Brits until you see the savagery of the Greeks and Indians.
I'm part Greek and I disagree. We brought so much value to the humanity and we were never such large scale invaders like British.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:London papers report Londoners are split about the Queen's decision on Camilla.
Well no shit. Queen Ho is not something people are just going to 'get used to' because Charles whined about it. I look forward to the rumblings growing louder. Especially since the public just found out that this announcement has been in the works for FIVE YEARS while Charles was tut-tutting and protesting he wasn't even thinking about it the whole time.![]()
![]()
Camilla probably doesn't give a royal sh*t if she becomes the Queen Consort. The Queen and the Firm probably care because they want to introduce a commoner-- albeit one with a bit of a royal pedigree--into the line before the bog standard commoner, Kate Middleton, becomes Queen Consort to William.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if they will give back the Elgin Marbles and the Koh-i-Noor diamond. British people used to be such savages.
You do understand that the Elgin Marbles were made by slave labor and the Koh--Noor diamond was mined by slave labor. Don't get all sniffy on the Brits until you see the savagery of the Greeks and Indians.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:London papers report Londoners are split about the Queen's decision on Camilla.
Well no shit. Queen Ho is not something people are just going to 'get used to' because Charles whined about it. I look forward to the rumblings growing louder. Especially since the public just found out that this announcement has been in the works for FIVE YEARS while Charles was tut-tutting and protesting he wasn't even thinking about it the whole time.![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:I wonder if they will give back the Elgin Marbles and the Koh-i-Noor diamond. British people used to be such savages.
Anonymous wrote:London papers report Londoners are split about the Queen's decision on Camilla.
no but she allowed it.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love Camilla. She doesn’t whine, doesn’t need to be in the spotlight and is committed to her work. The press absolutely crucified her for YEARS. Most of you are probably too young to remember- but it was Worse than ANY other royal and she took it like a champ.
How would it look if she did whine after being an adulterous, encouraging Charles to be adulterous and smearing it in Diana’s face? She got what she wanted by making the lives of others miserable.
No one forced Charles to want to be her tampon.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love Camilla. She doesn’t whine, doesn’t need to be in the spotlight and is committed to her work. The press absolutely crucified her for YEARS. Most of you are probably too young to remember- but it was Worse than ANY other royal and she took it like a champ.
How would it look if she did whine after being an adulterous, encouraging Charles to be adulterous and smearing it in Diana’s face? She got what she wanted by making the lives of others miserable.
Anonymous wrote:Love Camilla. She doesn’t whine, doesn’t need to be in the spotlight and is committed to her work. The press absolutely crucified her for YEARS. Most of you are probably too young to remember- but it was Worse than ANY other royal and she took it like a champ.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"And when, in the fullness of time, my son Charles becomes King, I know you will give him and his wife Camilla the same support that you have given me; and it is my sincere wish that, when that time comes, Camilla will be known as Queen Consort as she continues her own loyal service."
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/05/uk/queen-elizabeth-ii-platinum-jubilee-accession-day-gbr-intl/index.html
Diana would have been gutted. She would be in her third or or fourth marriage to a middle eastern cokehead and Camilla will be Queen consort.
Or maybe she would have married Hasnat Khan, had a few more kids, and reached the point where she no longer feared that she might be killed if the future king of England had non-white, possibly Muslim, siblings.
Khan dropped her and Diana embarrassed herself by throwing herself at him. In fact he returned to Pakistan so that he would not be involved in the drama after Diana’s death. He also said he would not marry her because of cultural differences. He respected her charitable work snd probably thought it was fun to boff her, but she would never be his wife. You have little understanding of the Middle Eastern male mind if you think most Muslim men would want to procreate with Diana. She had her virgin moment with Charles and was not recreating it for a Muslim man.
Don't be silly. Thousands of Middle Eastern men have married and procreated with Western women.
Commoners, of course. But not someone of Diana’s standing and certainly not Khan who married and divorced one young woman and is now married to another young woman. At 36, Diana was over her sale by date for Khan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"And when, in the fullness of time, my son Charles becomes King, I know you will give him and his wife Camilla the same support that you have given me; and it is my sincere wish that, when that time comes, Camilla will be known as Queen Consort as she continues her own loyal service."
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/05/uk/queen-elizabeth-ii-platinum-jubilee-accession-day-gbr-intl/index.html
Diana would have been gutted. She would be in her third or or fourth marriage to a middle eastern cokehead and Camilla will be Queen consort.
Or maybe she would have married Hasnat Khan, had a few more kids, and reached the point where she no longer feared that she might be killed if the future king of England had non-white, possibly Muslim, siblings.
Khan dropped her and Diana embarrassed herself by throwing herself at him. In fact he returned to Pakistan so that he would not be involved in the drama after Diana’s death. He also said he would not marry her because of cultural differences. He respected her charitable work snd probably thought it was fun to boff her, but she would never be his wife. You have little understanding of the Middle Eastern male mind if you think most Muslim men would want to procreate with Diana. She had her virgin moment with Charles and was not recreating it for a Muslim man.
Don't be silly. Thousands of Middle Eastern men have married and procreated with Western women.