Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't have 3 million for a house and I know this is controversial after reading the thread, but I'm just going to say it: this renovation is stunning and I wish more people would renovate/develop houses this way in DC.
I can’t believe you read the entire thread if this is your takeaway. I guarantee if you actually had 3 million to spend, you’d pass on this very troubled house (for many reasons).
I have to say it- PP’s post sounds like it’s the developer back again.
Show me something better for $3 million. You people were complaining about a small $2.4 million dated center hall colonial in AU Park earlier this week that - gasp - also doesn't have off street parking. That house went under contract immediately.
I would take this one in a heartbeat if I had to choose. I don't care about off-street parking as much as some poster, but this has two garage spaces. I would paint the entire thing and take out the hideous master tub and put in in something freestanding. Much better layout, and I'm not into living in a fishbowl. I live in the neighborhood and it *glows.*
https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/14-Grafton-St-Chevy-Chase-MD-20815/37168296_zpid/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't have 3 million for a house and I know this is controversial after reading the thread, but I'm just going to say it: this renovation is stunning and I wish more people would renovate/develop houses this way in DC.
I can’t believe you read the entire thread if this is your takeaway. I guarantee if you actually had 3 million to spend, you’d pass on this very troubled house (for many reasons).
I have to say it- PP’s post sounds like it’s the developer back again.
Show me something better for $3 million. You people were complaining about a small $2.4 million dated center hall colonial in AU Park earlier this week that - gasp - also doesn't have off street parking. That house went under contract immediately.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't have 3 million for a house and I know this is controversial after reading the thread, but I'm just going to say it: this renovation is stunning and I wish more people would renovate/develop houses this way in DC.
I can’t believe you read the entire thread if this is your takeaway. I guarantee if you actually had 3 million to spend, you’d pass on this very troubled house (for many reasons).
I have to say it- PP’s post sounds like it’s the developer back again.
Anonymous wrote:I don't have 3 million for a house and I know this is controversial after reading the thread, but I'm just going to say it: this renovation is stunning and I wish more people would renovate/develop houses this way in DC.
Anonymous wrote:I would actually say the lack of off-street parking is the least of their issues. This house was under contract once and it fell through, presumably as a result of whatever is going on with the wall of windows in the rear. Besides, that there have been no other buyers in almost three months…..in a neighborhood that usually sees houses selling in less than a week for over ask with multiple offers. The multitude of issues with this house are listed by many throughout this string. They appear to range from major design flaws to specific taste level issues.
Anonymous wrote:I don't have 3 million for a house and I know this is controversial after reading the thread, but I'm just going to say it: this renovation is stunning and I wish more people would renovate/develop houses this way in DC.
Anonymous wrote:Price drop — now $3M
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just a walk down memory lane what the "neighbor" *cough*developer*cough* was saying before:
Nothing you said is false, but you’re missing the point. The key thing that you mentioned is that the alley is a paper alley owned by DDOT — I have spoke to DDOT multiple times about this, as have all the neighbors. The alley WILL be paved to the end of that house’s property line to allow two permeable paver parking spots.. This isn’t up for debate — this is a fact.. It is already on DDOT’s schedule and the preconstruction meeting has already taken place. Furthermore, if any of the homes to the left of the property want the paving to extend, they have that right and they can phone it in to DDOT.
Bottom line — whether you or the few neighbors that are complaining disapprove is irrelevant. It will be done. If you would like we can trade emails and place a bet on whether it gets done or not. Easy money for yours truly.
Good luck to the sucker who buys this from a developer and realtor who like to tell tall tales!
+1 sounds like yours truly lost the easy money[/quote
Lol-exactly what I thought. Back here to bully. Sheesh.
Not sure what you mean? It appears the pp with bolded type is the bully. Likely the developer or agent.
I was agreeing with the PP I quoted.
Oh good!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just a walk down memory lane what the "neighbor" *cough*developer*cough* was saying before:
Nothing you said is false, but you’re missing the point. The key thing that you mentioned is that the alley is a paper alley owned by DDOT — I have spoke to DDOT multiple times about this, as have all the neighbors. The alley WILL be paved to the end of that house’s property line to allow two permeable paver parking spots.. This isn’t up for debate — this is a fact.. It is already on DDOT’s schedule and the preconstruction meeting has already taken place. Furthermore, if any of the homes to the left of the property want the paving to extend, they have that right and they can phone it in to DDOT.
Bottom line — whether you or the few neighbors that are complaining disapprove is irrelevant. It will be done. If you would like we can trade emails and place a bet on whether it gets done or not. Easy money for yours truly.
Good luck to the sucker who buys this from a developer and realtor who like to tell tall tales!
+1 sounds like yours truly lost the easy money[/quote
Lol-exactly what I thought. Back here to bully. Sheesh.
Not sure what you mean? It appears the pp with bolded type is the bully. Likely the developer or agent.
I was agreeing with the PP I quoted.