Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep sucking down that hubris Californians and San Franciscans:

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/venture-capital-startups-moving-away-silicon-valley-aol-cofounder-130659259.html




People are sick and tired of CA's insane politics, nosebleed taxes, overregulation, COL, and having to dodge human fecal bombs on their way to work.

Money is fleeing Silicon Valley and CA. CA is a has been. While Californians continue to suck down their hubris like it is still 2005, they will wake up one day with their legs swept out from underneath them when they realize no more VC money is flowing into the state to found more tech unicorns.

What does this have to do with policing?

Don't play dumb.

Why in the world would you start a company in CA now with its out of control crime? You pay nosebleed taxes, and for what? Crime that's out of control, fecal bombs in the street, and open hard drug use everywhere? The lack of policing and out of control crime in SF/Silicon Valley that's turning the state into a cesspool is a big reason why companies and VC dollars are fleeing CA or are no longer entering the state. CA is a has been. You can thank their idiotic progressive politicians for ruining the state. They are going to wake up one day with the rest of the country eating their lunch in terms of new growth/new companies. When that happens, the tax base will predictably flee for greener pastures, and CA will be caught in a downward death spiral as their revenue base collapses.

Anonymous wrote:Keep sucking down that hubris Californians and San Franciscans:

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/venture-capital-startups-moving-away-silicon-valley-aol-cofounder-130659259.html




People are sick and tired of CA's insane politics, nosebleed taxes, overregulation, COL, and having to dodge human fecal bombs on their way to work.

Money is fleeing Silicon Valley and CA. CA is a has been. While Californians continue to suck down their hubris like it is still 2005, they will wake up one day with their legs swept out from underneath them when they realize no more VC money is flowing into the state to found more tech unicorns.

What does this have to do with policing?

Keep sucking down that hubris Californians and San Franciscans:

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/venture-capital-startups-moving-away-silicon-valley-aol-cofounder-130659259.html




People are sick and tired of CA's insane politics, nosebleed taxes, overregulation, COL, and having to dodge human fecal bombs on their way to work.

Money is fleeing Silicon Valley and CA. CA is a has been. While Californians continue to suck down their hubris like it is still 2005, they will wake up one day with their legs swept out from underneath them when they realize no more VC money is flowing into the state to found more tech unicorns.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have spent about 22 years in San Fran off and on. I have had a rent controlled apartment in north beach since late 90s.

The real drug use used to be in the tenderloin and haight.
Now we have needles all over the place it is dangerous for dogs to walk. I use to kick the homeless off our front stoop and they would relocate; now they just get up, let me get in to my apartment and camp back down on the stoop. The police do nothing so no point in calling anyone about.

The da is terrible, even by San Francisco standards. The recall will happen this spring.

I would not tell anyone that the city is a good place to raise a family, but it is a beautiful city that will bounce back; just without many kids in it, or at least there should not be many families in the city proper.

I'm extremely suspicious of the DA. His parents were literal terrorists who went to prison and then he was raised by Bill Ayers. The he went to Venezuela and worked as Hugo Chávez interpreter. It's like he's intentionally sowing chaos, and when you look at his background it explains what his motivation may be.

That would actually explain quite a lot.

I'm the one that posted that. As shocking as it is that he has a background working directly for an adversary who hates the US and who turned his own nation into a failed state where people are starving and even educated women turn to prostitution just to get by, it's even more shocking that the people of SF voted him in. I'm sad for SF but it's also like, what did you think would happen?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have spent about 22 years in San Fran off and on. I have had a rent controlled apartment in north beach since late 90s.

The real drug use used to be in the tenderloin and haight.
Now we have needles all over the place it is dangerous for dogs to walk. I use to kick the homeless off our front stoop and they would relocate; now they just get up, let me get in to my apartment and camp back down on the stoop. The police do nothing so no point in calling anyone about.

The da is terrible, even by San Francisco standards. The recall will happen this spring.

I would not tell anyone that the city is a good place to raise a family, but it is a beautiful city that will bounce back; just without many kids in it, or at least there should not be many families in the city proper.

I'm extremely suspicious of the DA. His parents were literal terrorists who went to prison and then he was raised by Bill Ayers. The he went to Venezuela and worked as Hugo Chávez interpreter. It's like he's intentionally sowing chaos, and when you look at his background it explains what his motivation may be.

That would actually explain quite a lot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SF is doing just fine- ignore the flyover haters.

Many are jealous of the SF brain trust. No, we don’t need the Jesus freak peanut gallery. We’re doing just fine, move along

So much delusion packed into one bitter little post.

Anonymous wrote:SF is doing just fine- ignore the flyover haters.

You clearly don’t live in San Francisco.

Anonymous wrote:SF is doing just fine- ignore the flyover haters.

Many are jealous of the SF brain trust. No, we don’t need the Jesus freak peanut gallery. We’re doing just fine, move along

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SF is doing just fine- ignore the flyover haters.

I’m a Californian who used to live there and now live elsewhere in California, and SF is definitely a cesspool, no doubt about it.

All of California is in decline. It's so sad to see our most beautiful state being run into the ground.

Anonymous wrote:SF is doing just fine- ignore the flyover haters.

I’m a Californian who used to live there and now live elsewhere in California, and SF is definitely a cesspool, no doubt about it.

SF is doing just fine- ignore the flyover haters.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are.million dollar homes in cities like Sao Paolo and Rio. Even Mexico City. The overwhelming portion of those cities, however, are variable crap holes filled with murder, crime, drugs and human trafficking.. you can't even walk around at night in Sao Paolo. Real estate prices don't mean anything. Even a crap hole like SF can have high real estate prices even though they're pretty much a 10th century fedual system with open sewer pits and needles everywhere. Big whoop about real estate prices. SF is still a miserable trash hole.

Completely agree. It's really too bad - I spent some time in SF in the early 90s and loved it. No way would I revisit now - especially with my family. And that goes for Seattle and Portland too. Utter cesspools.

- thanks 100% to democrats and democrat policies.

+1

Anonymous wrote:I have spent about 22 years in San Fran off and on. I have had a rent controlled apartment in north beach since late 90s.

The real drug use used to be in the tenderloin and haight.
Now we have needles all over the place it is dangerous for dogs to walk. I use to kick the homeless off our front stoop and they would relocate; now they just get up, let me get in to my apartment and camp back down on the stoop. The police do nothing so no point in calling anyone about.

The da is terrible, even by San Francisco standards. The recall will happen this spring.

I would not tell anyone that the city is a good place to raise a family, but it is a beautiful city that will bounce back; just without many kids in it, or at least there should not be many families in the city proper.

I'm extremely suspicious of the DA. His parents were literal terrorists who went to prison and then he was raised by Bill Ayers. The he went to Venezuela and worked as Hugo Chávez interpreter. It's like he's intentionally sowing chaos, and when you look at his background it explains what his motivation may be.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are.million dollar homes in cities like Sao Paolo and Rio. Even Mexico City. The overwhelming portion of those cities, however, are variable crap holes filled with murder, crime, drugs and human trafficking.. you can't even walk around at night in Sao Paolo. Real estate prices don't mean anything. Even a crap hole like SF can have high real estate prices even though they're pretty much a 10th century fedual system with open sewer pits and needles everywhere. Big whoop about real estate prices. SF is still a miserable trash hole.

This argument is weak. Yes, there are expensive houses in places like Sao Paolo, but as you conveniently omit, there are many areas in Sao Paolo where housing is much cheaper. Everywhere in SF is expensive. There are no cheap places. because the city is beautiful, the economy is dynamic, and people with money want to live there.

City services can't clean the streets.

Firehose works