Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They stated on the stand that they had a sexual relationship. Not apparently a very good one and it didn't last. They broke up. So the convoluted theory that she hired him so that he could spend her office's money on her doesn't work anymore.

LOL. Not a very critical thinker, huh?
They went on 5 trips together. And, who knows if they are still seeing each other. Can we trust what either say if they lied about when their affair started?

People are allowed to travel together. That’s not a crime.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They stated on the stand that they had a sexual relationship. Not apparently a very good one and it didn't last. They broke up. So the convoluted theory that she hired him so that he could spend her office's money on her doesn't work anymore.

LOL. Not a very critical thinker, huh?
They went on 5 trips together. And, who knows if they are still seeing each other. Can we trust what either say if they lied about when their affair started?

Anonymous wrote:They stated on the stand that they had a sexual relationship. Not apparently a very good one and it didn't last. They broke up. So the convoluted theory that she hired him so that he could spend her office's money on her doesn't work anymore.

In one instance, in September of 2021, before Wade was hired for the case, the investigator claims in the affidavit that Wade went to Willis' address in the middle of the night.

Specifically, the investigator claims in his affidavit that records show Wade's phone arrived in the area of Willis's apartment at 10:45 pm in September 2021, and remained there until approximately 3:30 in the morning. The investigator claimed the records show Wade's phone arrived back to the area of his apartment just after 4:05 a.m., and that Wade "sent a text at 4:20am to Ms. Willis."

The filing from Trump's attorney says Mittlestadt is "available to testify at the Court's convenience."

Anonymous wrote:About 11,000 were probably spam asking for campaign donations

You are all so desperate for it to actually mean something.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha! Trump’s lawyers have “corrected” their affidavit asking to enter more evidence.
Turns out there aren’t 11,000 texts.

There are 13,000.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

How and why would they have phone records? On what legal authority would they be able to request it? There are no criminal charges against Willis. Don't you need a warrant from a judge? And doesn't "warrant" actually have some criminal charges associated with it?

What? A warrant? Why would they need such a thing? Silly you.
The government was able to get all kinds of records from banks and phone companies with simple requests when it came to Jan. 6.

But...............In this case, they had a subpoena.....

"Friday’s court filing includes an affidavit from Charles Mittelstadt, a longtime investigator for defense attorneys. He said he obtained the cellphone data from AT&T through a subpoena."
https://www.ajc.com/politics/breaking-cellphone-data-raise-questions-about-start-of-willis-wade-relationship/SFVMYPTD2RD3HMZYOH3377CNNE/

How did he get a subpoena?

From a clerk, a judge, or other court officer.

Private investigators cannot get phone records because they cannot get subpoenas.

Anonymous wrote:Ha! Trump’s lawyers have “corrected” their affidavit asking to enter more evidence.
Turns out there aren’t 11,000 texts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breaking: Rep. Jordan of the Judiciary Committee spoke to several 'whistleblowers' from Fani Willis' Office.

You're talking about Gym Jordan??? Soapy Gym?? Ha ha ha ha ha.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

How and why would they have phone records? On what legal authority would they be able to request it? There are no criminal charges against Willis. Don't you need a warrant from a judge? And doesn't "warrant" actually have some criminal charges associated with it?

What? A warrant? Why would they need such a thing? Silly you.
The government was able to get all kinds of records from banks and phone companies with simple requests when it came to Jan. 6.

But...............In this case, they had a subpoena.....

"Friday’s court filing includes an affidavit from Charles Mittelstadt, a longtime investigator for defense attorneys. He said he obtained the cellphone data from AT&T through a subpoena."
https://www.ajc.com/politics/breaking-cellphone-data-raise-questions-about-start-of-willis-wade-relationship/SFVMYPTD2RD3HMZYOH3377CNNE/

How did he get a subpoena?

From a clerk, a judge, or other court officer.