Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I've said this before: people who don't vote for one of the two main candidates are making a statement only to themselves. This literally helps nothing. In the race before us, there is a clearly better choice and whatever your reason for "writing in Biden," it will not be advanced by doing so.
yep. and it's cowardly and narcissistic.
Just listen to yourself. Disparaging people who don’t agree with how you vote isn’t helping your cause.
Newsflash - people can vote any way they want. Doing so does not make them cowardly or narcissistic.
But it’s clear that how to teach the Holocaust well has occupied Walz for decades. In 1993, while teaching in Nebraska, he was part of an inaugural conference of U.S. educators convened by the soon-to-open U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. Eight years later, after moving to Minnesota, he wrote a thesis arguing for changes in Holocaust education. And as governor, he backed a push to mandate teaching about the Holocaust in Minnesota schools.
Through it all, Walz modeled and argued for careful instruction that treated the Holocaust as one of multiple genocides worth understanding.
“Schools are teaching about the Jewish Holocaust, but the way it is traditionally being taught is not leading to increased knowledge of the causes of genocide in all parts of the world,” Walz wrote in his thesis, submitted in 2001.
The thesis was the culmination of Walz’s master’s degree focused on Holocaust and genocide education at Minnesota State University, Mankato, which he earned while teaching at Mankato West. His 27-page thesis, which JTA obtained, is titled “Improving Human Rights and Genocide Studies in the American High School Classroom.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I've said this before: people who don't vote for one of the two main candidates are making a statement only to themselves. This literally helps nothing. In the race before us, there is a clearly better choice and whatever your reason for "writing in Biden," it will not be advanced by doing so.
These kind of people are self-important drama queens. PP was just using it as an opportunity to take a dig at Walz. It’s just an inauthentic post.
Different undecided voter here. People who are concerned about this far left ticket, who also refuse to vote for Trump, will just stay home.
I know it’s just a small subset of us, and the Dems are going after special interest groups with a large number of voters. So basically we are unhoused at the moment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I've said this before: people who don't vote for one of the two main candidates are making a statement only to themselves. This literally helps nothing. In the race before us, there is a clearly better choice and whatever your reason for "writing in Biden," it will not be advanced by doing so.
These kind of people are self-important drama queens. PP was just using it as an opportunity to take a dig at Walz. It’s just an inauthentic post.
Different undecided voter here. People who are concerned about this far left ticket, who also refuse to vote for Trump, will just stay home.
I know it’s just a small subset of us, and the Dems are going after special interest groups with a large number of voters. So basically we are unhoused at the moment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Higher taxes to take the wealth amassed by the oligarchs and reinvest it in our communities? Sign me up.
Our government doesn’t have that responsibility or authority. That’s not what the United States government is supposed to have the power and authority to do.
There isn’t a single issue that our government has gotten involved in that has been improved for the average citizen. It’s all about taking more taxpayer dollars and spending them on solutions that don’t work and do nothing to improve the lives of Americans.
Do you drive on roads?
Save your money in a bank?
Drink water that’s not from a well?
Take medicine?
BREATHE CLEAN AIR???
The government is involved in everything you take for granted.
Yeah, let's not gut the FDA, okay? Safe food and medication nationwide, not just in the states that care about it and can afford it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I've said this before: people who don't vote for one of the two main candidates are making a statement only to themselves. This literally helps nothing. In the race before us, there is a clearly better choice and whatever your reason for "writing in Biden," it will not be advanced by doing so.
yep. and it's cowardly and narcissistic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it was up to JD Vance, I wouldn't have a family because of IVF.
Walz:
“Democrats are investing in prenatal care. We're the ones that are for universal pre-K. We're the ones that are providing school meals. I'm not gonna back down one bit on this whole family values thing. We're making it more affordable to have children by having paid family and medical leave. Where is JD Vance's program?”
Damned straight, Tim. This is why people like him & not the that freak, Vance.
The fed gov is supposed to be protecting our borders and funding and training our military. That’s its number one priority.
How about we do both? It's not a small government.
We don’t have the money to do both. The constitution says nothing about funding or investing in pre-k.
One in three families can’t afford basic school supplies for their kids. The economy stinks on ice. Why should the government take tax dollars to fund pre-k when taxpayers can’t afford school supplies?
The government has no mandate to fund so many things they are funding. Whatever personal challenges Walz or any other government official has faced, it’s their personal issue. Every single American has personal struggles and issues. The government should not be the answer to these personal issues and cannot be. The government cannot legislate personal issues. Walz is not speaking about the issues government has a duty to address; he’s speaking about his private fertility issues and those have no intersection with government.
Alabama Supreme Court said differently. Idaho is going after a banning of IVF. Project 2025, heritage foundation and JD Vance, all strong Donald supporters have vowed to go after a federal ban of abortion, followed by IVF and birth control.
Trump himself has said he does not want to ban abortion and he fully supports IVF.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Higher taxes to take the wealth amassed by the oligarchs and reinvest it in our communities? Sign me up.
Our government doesn’t have that responsibility or authority. That’s not what the United States government is supposed to have the power and authority to do.
There isn’t a single issue that our government has gotten involved in that has been improved for the average citizen. It’s all about taking more taxpayer dollars and spending them on solutions that don’t work and do nothing to improve the lives of Americans.
Do you drive on roads?
Save your money in a bank?
Drink water that’s not from a well?
Take medicine?
BREATHE CLEAN AIR???
The government is involved in everything you take for granted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Higher taxes to take the wealth amassed by the oligarchs and reinvest it in our communities? Sign me up.
Our government doesn’t have that responsibility or authority. That’s not what the United States government is supposed to have the power and authority to do.
There isn’t a single issue that our government has gotten involved in that has been improved for the average citizen. It’s all about taking more taxpayer dollars and spending them on solutions that don’t work and do nothing to improve the lives of Americans.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I've said this before: people who don't vote for one of the two main candidates are making a statement only to themselves. This literally helps nothing. In the race before us, there is a clearly better choice and whatever your reason for "writing in Biden," it will not be advanced by doing so.
These kind of people are self-important drama queens. PP was just using it as an opportunity to take a dig at Walz. It’s just an inauthentic post.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it was up to JD Vance, I wouldn't have a family because of IVF.
Walz:
“Democrats are investing in prenatal care. We're the ones that are for universal pre-K. We're the ones that are providing school meals. I'm not gonna back down one bit on this whole family values thing. We're making it more affordable to have children by having paid family and medical leave. Where is JD Vance's program?”
Damned straight, Tim. This is why people like him & not the that freak, Vance.
The fed gov is supposed to be protecting our borders and funding and training our military. That’s its number one priority.
How about we do both? It's not a small government.
We don’t have the money to do both. The constitution says nothing about funding or investing in pre-k.
One in three families can’t afford basic school supplies for their kids. The economy stinks on ice. Why should the government take tax dollars to fund pre-k when taxpayers can’t afford school supplies?
The government has no mandate to fund so many things they are funding. Whatever personal challenges Walz or any other government official has faced, it’s their personal issue. Every single American has personal struggles and issues. The government should not be the answer to these personal issues and cannot be. The government cannot legislate personal issues. Walz is not speaking about the issues government has a duty to address; he’s speaking about his private fertility issues and those have no intersection with government.
Alabama Supreme Court said differently. Idaho is going after a banning of IVF. Project 2025, heritage foundation and JD Vance, all strong Donald supporters have vowed to go after a federal ban of abortion, followed by IVF and birth control.
Trump himself has said he does not want to ban abortion and he fully supports IVF.
The guy is owned by the Heritage Foundation.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it was up to JD Vance, I wouldn't have a family because of IVF.
Walz:
“Democrats are investing in prenatal care. We're the ones that are for universal pre-K. We're the ones that are providing school meals. I'm not gonna back down one bit on this whole family values thing. We're making it more affordable to have children by having paid family and medical leave. Where is JD Vance's program?”
Damned straight, Tim. This is why people like him & not the that freak, Vance.
The fed gov is supposed to be protecting our borders and funding and training our military. That’s its number one priority.
How about we do both? It's not a small government.
We don’t have the money to do both. The constitution says nothing about funding or investing in pre-k.
One in three families can’t afford basic school supplies for their kids. The economy stinks on ice. Why should the government take tax dollars to fund pre-k when taxpayers can’t afford school supplies?
The government has no mandate to fund so many things they are funding. Whatever personal challenges Walz or any other government official has faced, it’s their personal issue. Every single American has personal struggles and issues. The government should not be the answer to these personal issues and cannot be. The government cannot legislate personal issues. Walz is not speaking about the issues government has a duty to address; he’s speaking about his private fertility issues and those have no intersection with government.
Dobbs had a helluva lot to do with a lot of people's reproductive decisions. Did you want people to be ashamed and afraid to talk about what impact federal legal decisions are having on their real, lived lives in that setting as well?
The United States is made up of more than women of childbearing age who want to kill their unborn babies. There is absolutely nothing in the Constitution regarding abortion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it was up to JD Vance, I wouldn't have a family because of IVF.
Walz:
“Democrats are investing in prenatal care. We're the ones that are for universal pre-K. We're the ones that are providing school meals. I'm not gonna back down one bit on this whole family values thing. We're making it more affordable to have children by having paid family and medical leave. Where is JD Vance's program?”
Damned straight, Tim. This is why people like him & not the that freak, Vance.
The fed gov is supposed to be protecting our borders and funding and training our military. That’s its number one priority.
How about we do both? It's not a small government.
We don’t have the money to do both. The constitution says nothing about funding or investing in pre-k.
One in three families can’t afford basic school supplies for their kids. The economy stinks on ice. Why should the government take tax dollars to fund pre-k when taxpayers can’t afford school supplies?
The government has no mandate to fund so many things they are funding. Whatever personal challenges Walz or any other government official has faced, it’s their personal issue. Every single American has personal struggles and issues. The government should not be the answer to these personal issues and cannot be. The government cannot legislate personal issues. Walz is not speaking about the issues government has a duty to address; he’s speaking about his private fertility issues and those have no intersection with government.
Alabama Supreme Court said differently. Idaho is going after a banning of IVF. Project 2025, heritage foundation and JD Vance, all strong Donald supporters have vowed to go after a federal ban of abortion, followed by IVF and birth control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Higher taxes to take the wealth amassed by the oligarchs and reinvest it in our communities? Sign me up.
Our government doesn’t have that responsibility or authority. That’s not what the United States government is supposed to have the power and authority to do.
There isn’t a single issue that our government has gotten involved in that has been improved for the average citizen. It’s all about taking more taxpayer dollars and spending them on solutions that don’t work and do nothing to improve the lives of Americans.