Anonymous
Post 01/18/2026 12:01     Subject: 2030 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I took the 2026 rosters for the pre-season USA Lacrosse Top 10 and asked Gemini to sort the players by home state.

According to my Gemini, which is often not a reliable source, based on the 2026 women's lacrosse rosters for Maryland, Clemson, Duke, Johns Hopkins, UNC, Stanford, Northwestern, Florida, Boston College, and Princeton, the players come from the following states and regions, sorted from most to least:

New York (N.Y.)92
Maryland (Md.)71
New Jersey (N.J.)41
Pennsylvania (Pa.)29
Massachusetts (Mass.)25
Connecticut (Conn.)24
Florida (Fla.)12
Virginia (Va.)11
Colorado (Colo.)8
Georgia (Ga.)7
California (Calif.)7
Texas (Tex.)4
North Carolina (N.C.)4
Ontario, Canada3
Tennessee (Tenn.)3
Ohio (Ohio)2
Illinois (Ill.)2
New Hampshire (N.H.)2
Minnesota (Minn.)1
Michigan (Mich.)1
Delaware (Del.)1
Vermont (Vt.)1
Washington (Wash.)1
Oregon (Ore.)1
Utah (Utah)1
England1
Australia1
Japan1


AI doesn’t distinguish Baltimore / HoCo area MD players from DMV MD-area players. That’s why these stats give an accurate picture:

Number of Baltimore-area players on top 5 teams:

UNC - 2 / 36 (6%)
BC - 2 / 32 (6%)
NW - 2 / 39 (5%)
Stanford - 5 / 34 (15%)
Florida - 7 / 40 (18%)

Average - Baltimore-area players make up 10% of top 5 program rosters


It makes no sense to look at the number of MD players on current top 5 teams and then conclude top teams don’t recruit from MD teams considering ALL of those players were recruited many years ago when the “top” list was different.
Anonymous
Post 01/18/2026 10:06     Subject: 2030 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:I took the 2026 rosters for the pre-season USA Lacrosse Top 10 and asked Gemini to sort the players by home state.

According to my Gemini, which is often not a reliable source, based on the 2026 women's lacrosse rosters for Maryland, Clemson, Duke, Johns Hopkins, UNC, Stanford, Northwestern, Florida, Boston College, and Princeton, the players come from the following states and regions, sorted from most to least:

New York (N.Y.)92
Maryland (Md.)71
New Jersey (N.J.)41
Pennsylvania (Pa.)29
Massachusetts (Mass.)25
Connecticut (Conn.)24
Florida (Fla.)12
Virginia (Va.)11
Colorado (Colo.)8
Georgia (Ga.)7
California (Calif.)7
Texas (Tex.)4
North Carolina (N.C.)4
Ontario, Canada3
Tennessee (Tenn.)3
Ohio (Ohio)2
Illinois (Ill.)2
New Hampshire (N.H.)2
Minnesota (Minn.)1
Michigan (Mich.)1
Delaware (Del.)1
Vermont (Vt.)1
Washington (Wash.)1
Oregon (Ore.)1
Utah (Utah)1
England1
Australia1
Japan1


AI doesn’t distinguish Baltimore / HoCo area MD players from DMV MD-area players. That’s why these stats give an accurate picture:

Number of Baltimore-area players on top 5 teams:

UNC - 2 / 36 (6%)
BC - 2 / 32 (6%)
NW - 2 / 39 (5%)
Stanford - 5 / 34 (15%)
Florida - 7 / 40 (18%)

Average - Baltimore-area players make up 10% of top 5 program rosters
Anonymous
Post 01/18/2026 09:29     Subject: 2030 Girls Lacrosse

I took the 2026 rosters for the pre-season USA Lacrosse Top 10 and asked Gemini to sort the players by home state.

According to my Gemini, which is often not a reliable source, based on the 2026 women's lacrosse rosters for Maryland, Clemson, Duke, Johns Hopkins, UNC, Stanford, Northwestern, Florida, Boston College, and Princeton, the players come from the following states and regions, sorted from most to least:

New York (N.Y.)92
Maryland (Md.)71
New Jersey (N.J.)41
Pennsylvania (Pa.)29
Massachusetts (Mass.)25
Connecticut (Conn.)24
Florida (Fla.)12
Virginia (Va.)11
Colorado (Colo.)8
Georgia (Ga.)7
California (Calif.)7
Texas (Tex.)4
North Carolina (N.C.)4
Ontario, Canada3
Tennessee (Tenn.)3
Ohio (Ohio)2
Illinois (Ill.)2
New Hampshire (N.H.)2
Minnesota (Minn.)1
Michigan (Mich.)1
Delaware (Del.)1
Vermont (Vt.)1
Washington (Wash.)1
Oregon (Ore.)1
Utah (Utah)1
England1
Australia1
Japan1
Anonymous
Post 01/18/2026 09:04     Subject: 2030 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Math doesn’t spin. Math is math and these numbers show that the majority of players on the nation’s top teams aren’t from the Baltimore area.


Numbers certainly can be spun all sorts of ways. What is the end goal? I can prob pull a list of all D1 teams and find out % from each state, to show MD top 3. That’s very different than examine roster of the 10 top 10 teams.

University of MD itself doesn’t take majority MD kids in their class.

NW does not pull MD recruits often. the coach is from NE, she recruits from NE. Things like that are one offs.



None of this changes the fact that coaches who’ve had success at the very top of the sport aren’t recruiting from Maryland anymore.


As a parent of a 2028 player who has attended recruiting tournaments, camps, and clinics over the past ten weeks, I can confirm that top coaches are actively recruiting players from Maryland.


Coaches can’t speak to the 28s yet so this is impossible for you or anyone to know until 9/1. But let’s say (for sake of argument) that you’re right, and that M&D and Hero’s each send five players to top 5 teams — a ridiculous scenario but let’s just entertain it for a sec. This would only increase the overall average of Maryland players on top 5 teams to 20%.


Well, my advice to you would be to not wait until 9/1 of her junior year to start the recruiting dance. Sure, there are restrictions, but that certainly does not mean there is no recruiting going on.
Anonymous
Post 01/18/2026 08:55     Subject: 2030 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Math doesn’t spin. Math is math and these numbers show that the majority of players on the nation’s top teams aren’t from the Baltimore area.


Numbers certainly can be spun all sorts of ways. What is the end goal? I can prob pull a list of all D1 teams and find out % from each state, to show MD top 3. That’s very different than examine roster of the 10 top 10 teams.

University of MD itself doesn’t take majority MD kids in their class.

NW does not pull MD recruits often. the coach is from NE, she recruits from NE. Things like that are one offs.



None of this changes the fact that coaches who’ve had success at the very top of the sport aren’t recruiting from Maryland anymore.


As a parent of a 2028 player who has attended recruiting tournaments, camps, and clinics over the past ten weeks, I can confirm that top coaches are actively recruiting players from Maryland.


Coaches can’t speak to the 28s yet so this is impossible for you or anyone to know until 9/1. But let’s say (for sake of argument) that you’re right, and that M&D and Hero’s each send five players to top 5 teams — a ridiculous scenario but let’s just entertain it for a sec. This would only increase the overall average of Maryland players on top 5 teams to 20%.
Anonymous
Post 01/18/2026 08:24     Subject: 2030 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Math doesn’t spin. Math is math and these numbers show that the majority of players on the nation’s top teams aren’t from the Baltimore area.


Numbers certainly can be spun all sorts of ways. What is the end goal? I can prob pull a list of all D1 teams and find out % from each state, to show MD top 3. That’s very different than examine roster of the 10 top 10 teams.

University of MD itself doesn’t take majority MD kids in their class.

NW does not pull MD recruits often. the coach is from NE, she recruits from NE. Things like that are one offs.



None of this changes the fact that coaches who’ve had success at the very top of the sport aren’t recruiting from Maryland anymore.


As a parent of a 2028 player who has attended recruiting tournaments, camps, and clinics over the past ten weeks, I can confirm that top coaches are actively recruiting players from Maryland.
Anonymous
Post 01/18/2026 08:14     Subject: 2030 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Maryland doesn’t send players to top programs anymore. NY area, Mass and Philly are the top areas these days.


Strange statement when both the top ranked offensive and defensive players in the nation are both from Hoco/Bmore and both went to Maryland. Are you saying they couldn’t have gone to any school of their choice?


It’s a misnomer to think that any player can go anywhere they want. It’s not up to them - it’s up to the coaches. The better question to ask is - why didn’t those players get recruited to a higher ranked program than Maryland? It couldn’t have been about money - if those players are as good as you say, top 5 coaches would have offered them big scholarships.
Anonymous
Post 01/18/2026 07:56     Subject: 2030 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Maryland doesn’t send players to top programs anymore. NY area, Mass and Philly are the top areas these days.


Strange statement when both the top ranked offensive and defensive players in the nation are both from Hoco/Bmore and both went to Maryland. Are you saying they couldn’t have gone to any school of their choice?


No - I’m saying they would be represented in the ~10% of players from Maryland on top five teams. Which isn’t a lot.
Anonymous
Post 01/18/2026 07:53     Subject: 2030 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Math doesn’t spin. Math is math and these numbers show that the majority of players on the nation’s top teams aren’t from the Baltimore area.


Numbers certainly can be spun all sorts of ways. What is the end goal? I can prob pull a list of all D1 teams and find out % from each state, to show MD top 3. That’s very different than examine roster of the 10 top 10 teams.

University of MD itself doesn’t take majority MD kids in their class.

NW does not pull MD recruits often. the coach is from NE, she recruits from NE. Things like that are one offs.



None of this changes the fact that coaches who’ve had success at the very top of the sport aren’t recruiting from Maryland anymore.
Anonymous
Post 01/18/2026 04:57     Subject: 2030 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:Maryland doesn’t send players to top programs anymore. NY area, Mass and Philly are the top areas these days.


Strange statement when both the top ranked offensive and defensive players in the nation are both from Hoco/Bmore and both went to Maryland. Are you saying they couldn’t have gone to any school of their choice?
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2026 23:55     Subject: 2030 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:Math doesn’t spin. Math is math and these numbers show that the majority of players on the nation’s top teams aren’t from the Baltimore area.


Numbers certainly can be spun all sorts of ways. What is the end goal? I can prob pull a list of all D1 teams and find out % from each state, to show MD top 3. That’s very different than examine roster of the 10 top 10 teams.

University of MD itself doesn’t take majority MD kids in their class.

NW does not pull MD recruits often. the coach is from NE, she recruits from NE. Things like that are one offs.

Anonymous
Post 01/17/2026 21:20     Subject: 2030 Girls Lacrosse

Maryland doesn’t send players to top programs anymore. NY area, Mass and Philly are the top areas these days.
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2026 08:42     Subject: 2030 Girls Lacrosse

An interesting note is that Northwestern doesn't take girls from M&D or Hero's, only Skywalkers. 3 of the 4 current MD girls came from Skywalkers and the 4th played for Capital.
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2026 06:59     Subject: 2030 Girls Lacrosse

Math doesn’t spin. Math is math and these numbers show that the majority of players on the nation’s top teams aren’t from the Baltimore area.
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2026 06:56     Subject: 2030 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:Number of Baltimore-area players on top 5 teams:

UNC - 2 / 36 (6%)
BC - 2 / 32 (6%)
NW - 2 / 39 (5%)
Stanford - 5 / 34 (15%)
Florida - 7 / 40 (18%)

Average - Baltimore-area players make up 10% of top 5 program rosters


I like this data but that’s an odd way of spinning that. Better way would be how many players in D1 are made up of MD kids. It’s as much about quantity as quality when measuring hotbeds.

The Denver area has produced elite talent, there’s over 8 million in that Denver area to pull from, they produced the a top five player in both the 2027 & 2025 classes and arguably top goalie recruit in last decade.

But they don’t have the volume a MD does.