Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know the front desk clerk had a conversation with this guy. Have the police mentioned any kind of accent? Foreign, southern etc?

I was thinking the same thing. It's strange that it hasn't been mentioned in news articles.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New photos of shooter in taxi.

https://nypost.com/2024/12/07/us-news/united-healthcare-ceo-brian-thompsons-alleged-assassin-seen-in-new-photos-nypd/

Looks like that chamalet kid.

Looks like he could be wearing fake eyebrows. Also eye shadow and lined eyes? Disguise?

Nah it’s called being middle Eastern

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are making crazy profits. How about just a reasonable profit?

is that how America works though? in any sector or industry?
if so, please name which one.

Also please define a reasonable profit? How much money should one be able to make? I’m
Guessing there are people in this country who think you are grossly overpaid for whatever you do OP. I’m sure you have much more than any one person truly “needs”. It’s easy to say “a billion is too much” but very hard to say what the lower limit should be.

I think after salaries and overhead are paid, there should be no profit in healthcare.

so all healthcare is non-profit? assume this applies to doc and hospital systems?

In my Utopia, yes. Everyone is paid a very healthy salary commiserate with their training and experience. Money is set aside for research, and maintenance on buildings and equipment, etc. But any money leftover is not used to pad corporate pockets. Any monies left beyond that mean that premiums were too high and should be lowered accordingly.

You realize insurance company profits are a tiny fraction of health care costs, right?

No, they still dont understand industry margins or scale. That’s why they have a blogger gig.

Who cares what the margin is, when the bottom line is $16-23 BILLION in profit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they find the guy it is going to be hard to find 12 people who are going to unanimously find him guilty.

I imagine one person goes with jury nullification and votes not guilty.

This is a horrific conclusion, which unfortunately, I believe may be true.

Jeff rightly blogged about how shocked he was at the number of DCUMAD posters who celebrated this cold-blooded murder, and some even encouraged more ruthless murders of CEOs who are simply doing their job.

Some of you are demonstrating true mental illness (dangerous, murderous), mental illness in this regard.

To those people: I pray you get the professional help you clearly need and turn away from supporting murder. Seriously.

Sorry, your claim has been denied. You are out of network.

It is impossible to find mental health care that takes insurance. Most people can't pay $200 and hour.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy is really brazen. Looking right at the camera in the cab. Leaving the monopoly money. I suspect that leaving the starbucks stuff behind was intentional. Maybe he's not a professional, but he is really good and he is trolling them big-time.

I was thinking this morning that it seems strange to me that the original photo of the suspect taken in Starbucks, which does not look like the guy in these subsequent photos at all, but is much more likely to be the suspect, no longer appears anywhere. Does anybody else find it strange? I do not believe the taxi photos--or even the hostel photos-are actually the suspect.

Yup, was thinking same. He could have been the “random” roommate in the hostel, who cleared all this guys stuff out just after he left. Team effort.

Am I the only one who thinks it looks like the same guy? It’s different lighting and different angles which accounts for some of the differences.

The taxi picture he’s clearly wearing a completely different jacket, but I don’t see how this surprises anyone. The guy has different jackets, he took great care to plan this out which accounts for the different wardrobe.

It's not the clothes that are the issue. It's the eyes, eyebrows, skin color. They are not the same person.

And the Starbucks photo has been removed from every place that ever ran it. Very troubling.

Starbucks guy has a different jacket on: not the same flaps on the hood. The pic from the hotel has a string at the hood and the Starbucks one doesn't. So I guess they maybe got the wrong guy's DNA?

He was at the hostel multiple days. I believe the hostel picture is not from the same day as shooting/Starbucks

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just don't think anyone is going to turn this guy in.

They need to up the reward to 1 million.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New photos of shooter in taxi.

https://nypost.com/2024/12/07/us-news/united-healthcare-ceo-brian-thompsons-alleged-assassin-seen-in-new-photos-nypd/

Looks like that chamalet kid.

Looks like he could be wearing fake eyebrows. Also eye shadow and lined eyes? Disguise?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy is really brazen. Looking right at the camera in the cab. Leaving the monopoly money. I suspect that leaving the starbucks stuff behind was intentional. Maybe he's not a professional, but he is really good and he is trolling them big-time.

I was thinking this morning that it seems strange to me that the original photo of the suspect taken in Starbucks, which does not look like the guy in these subsequent photos at all, but is much more likely to be the suspect, no longer appears anywhere. Does anybody else find it strange? I do not believe the taxi photos--or even the hostel photos-are actually the suspect.

Yup, was thinking same. He could have been the “random” roommate in the hostel, who cleared all this guys stuff out just after he left. Team effort.

Am I the only one who thinks it looks like the same guy? It’s different lighting and different angles which accounts for some of the differences.

The taxi picture he’s clearly wearing a completely different jacket, but I don’t see how this surprises anyone. The guy has different jackets, he took great care to plan this out which accounts for the different wardrobe.

It's not the clothes that are the issue. It's the eyes, eyebrows, skin color. They are not the same person.

And the Starbucks photo has been removed from every place that ever ran it. Very troubling.

Starbucks guy has a different jacket on: not the same flaps on the hood. The pic from the hotel has a string at the hood and the Starbucks one doesn't. So I guess they maybe got the wrong guy's DNA?

Anonymous wrote:He looks like Borat.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy is really brazen. Looking right at the camera in the cab. Leaving the monopoly money. I suspect that leaving the starbucks stuff behind was intentional. Maybe he's not a professional, but he is really good and he is trolling them big-time.

I was thinking this morning that it seems strange to me that the original photo of the suspect taken in Starbucks, which does not look like the guy in these subsequent photos at all, but is much more likely to be the suspect, no longer appears anywhere. Does anybody else find it strange? I do not believe the taxi photos--or even the hostel photos-are actually the suspect.

Yup, was thinking same. He could have been the “random” roommate in the hostel, who cleared all this guys stuff out just after he left. Team effort.

With all these photos, someone has recognized him by this point. Even if the police or FBI don't want to release his name, surely it would have been mentioned in social media?

The photos they are so prominently showing now aren't him. This is another strange, inside job, and we'll never know who did it or why.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are making crazy profits. How about just a reasonable profit?

is that how America works though? in any sector or industry?
if so, please name which one.

Also please define a reasonable profit? How much money should one be able to make? I’m
Guessing there are people in this country who think you are grossly overpaid for whatever you do OP. I’m sure you have much more than any one person truly “needs”. It’s easy to say “a billion is too much” but very hard to say what the lower limit should be.

I think after salaries and overhead are paid, there should be no profit in healthcare.

so all healthcare is non-profit? assume this applies to doc and hospital systems?

In my Utopia, yes. Everyone is paid a very healthy salary commiserate with their training and experience. Money is set aside for research, and maintenance on buildings and equipment, etc. But any money leftover is not used to pad corporate pockets. Any monies left beyond that mean that premiums were too high and should be lowered accordingly.

You realize insurance company profits are a tiny fraction of health care costs, right?

So what are the major costs? Why do other countries spend less on healthcare but have better outcomes?

Lol.

Nil R&D, PAs and midwives and nurses do everything, long waits, death panels, no end of life care.

Lol.

Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong and wrong.

--someone whose elderly parents have been receiving superb, state-of-the-art care at very low cost abroad for complex medical needs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is causing progressive politicians to expose themselves as puppets for corporations, Wall Street, and the defense industry.

New Yorker put that garbage up?

Wonder what their dior, Gucci and yves sponsors think….

FYI, New York Magazine is not the same thing as the New Yorker.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His picture has been widely shown. Surely someone recognized him and has connected with the police?

Why surely? If I knew him, I wouldn’t say a damn thing. Why should I? What’s to gain? Some chickensh!t reward for being a snitch? F’ that. This guy is no threat to me. He killed a scumbag, not some innocent person or kid. I wouldn’t call the cops even if he was living next door to me.

Most criminals are not a threat to you yet we have laws against injuring and killing people. You have absolutely no idea why this man killed him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I heard a breakdown of the CEO's $10 million dollar salary. He made $20 a minute. Compare that to someone making $20 an hour.

So? That doesn’t seem exorbitant to me. An extra few million is a drop in the bucket for their company and wouldn’t even be enough to cover the medical bankruptcy of more than a handful of people. I’ve never had UHC, but no one has to use them. It’s a free market. Get a different insurance/work somewhere else if you are so unhappy with your benefits. I’ve had three different medical insurers over the years and have never had any major problems getting treated or having them pay what they are contracted to pay in my plan.

1) I’m afraid your experience is far from universal.

2) Do you honestly think people suffering would not just “get a different insurance/work somewhere else” if that was an option for them? Especially after they’ve gotten very sick and their insurance has decided making them not die is not medically necessary? Why don’t you tell them to just eat cake Marie

Can you provide us an actual example of someone being denied standard care? Not experimental care. What is the DX and what is the care being denied? Otherwise you are trafficking hyperbole.