Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honest question here for you all who are so anti immigration: do you like social security? Do you or your parents or grandparents receive it? If yes to either of those question, consider how we can support this system without immigration with an otherwise declining population.

I believe there are many benefits to immigration other than just funding social security but you may be notification by self interest.

Now, I also believe that many (all?) of Biden’s immigration decisions were foolish and that we need firm border, control, vetting but let’s have that discussion in Congress and get real sensible immigration reform passed. Stop standing in the way GOP!

Do you support taking advantage of their labor and they receive nothing in their old age? The system you are referencing depends on immigrants paying in but receiving no services themselves in their old age. It's exploitative and disgusting.

No it doesn’t. The system would still work if we gave immigrants a path to citizenship. Social Security only collapses if there are more elderly people than young. With U.S. birth rates, that is inevitable unless the population is supplemented through immigration.

Anonymous wrote:Honest question here for you all who are so anti immigration: do you like social security? Do you or your parents or grandparents receive it? If yes to either of those question, consider how we can support this system without immigration with an otherwise declining population.

I believe there are many benefits to immigration other than just funding social security but you may be notification by self interest.

Now, I also believe that many (all?) of Biden’s immigration decisions were foolish and that we need firm border, control, vetting but let’s have that discussion in Congress and get real sensible immigration reform passed. Stop standing in the way GOP!

Do you support taking advantage of their labor and they receive nothing in their old age? The system you are referencing depends on immigrants paying in but receiving no services themselves in their old age. It's exploitative and disgusting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t matter how many cherry picked examples the groypers running the DHS Twitter post. “Illegal” immigrants commit less crime than U.S. citizens.

They shouldn’t be in the country. All of the crimes they commit wouldn’t happen if not for Democrats allowing open borders.

White men commit the most crimes in the U.S. By your logic they are the ones who shouldn’t be here.

US Citizens have a right to be here. Citizens of other countries do not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t matter how many cherry picked examples the groypers running the DHS Twitter post. “Illegal” immigrants commit less crime than U.S. citizens.

They shouldn’t be in the country. All of the crimes they commit wouldn’t happen if not for Democrats allowing open borders.

White men commit the most crimes in the U.S. By your logic they are the ones who shouldn’t be here.

Now do it per 100,000. It’s the favorite metric for people here until it contradicts the narrative they’re pushing.

Doesn’t matter. We’ve already established that illegal immigrants commit less crime per 100,000 people, but you still insist on deporting them to “prevent crime.” In absolute numbers, white men commit the most crime. Therefore, they should be the priority target under the reasoning you’ve laid out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t matter how many cherry picked examples the groypers running the DHS Twitter post. “Illegal” immigrants commit less crime than U.S. citizens.

They shouldn’t be in the country. All of the crimes they commit wouldn’t happen if not for Democrats allowing open borders.

White men commit the most crimes in the U.S. By your logic they are the ones who shouldn’t be here.

Now do it per 100,000. It’s the favorite metric for people here until it contradicts the narrative they’re pushing.

Honest question here for you all who are so anti immigration: do you like social security? Do you or your parents or grandparents receive it? If yes to either of those question, consider how we can support this system without immigration with an otherwise declining population.

I believe there are many benefits to immigration other than just funding social security but you may be notification by self interest.

Now, I also believe that many (all?) of Biden’s immigration decisions were foolish and that we need firm border, control, vetting but let’s have that discussion in Congress and get real sensible immigration reform passed. Stop standing in the way GOP!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t matter how many cherry picked examples the groypers running the DHS Twitter post. “Illegal” immigrants commit less crime than U.S. citizens.

They shouldn’t be in the country. All of the crimes they commit wouldn’t happen if not for Democrats allowing open borders.

White men commit the most crimes in the U.S. By your logic they are the ones who shouldn’t be here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump’s approvals on immigration are at 37%. Maybe the white nationalists in this thread should take note. The backlash to these policies is coming.

Nope, you are picking one outlier poll with the lowest number. Immigration is Trump’s best polling issue. Never mind that polls always underestimate Trump, because they oversample liberals who have nothing to do all day but talk about how much they hate Trump. If you want to see unpopular immigration policies, look at Biden’s numbers. Democrats are the ones with unpopular immigration policies. You lost the last election in big part because of those unpopular policies. Keep deluding yourselves into thinking there will be some massive backlash against Trump’s policies and people in this country will begin to believe in open borders. According to the CBS News poll, 90% of Republican voters approve of Trump’s immigration policies. Almost all who disapprove are liberals and none of us care what you think after pushing open borders and overwhelming immigration on us for four years.

Here are the most recent national polls (as of November 30 November 2025) on how Americans view the Trump administration’s immigration policies, listed from newest to oldest:

- **Economist/YouGov** (18–24 Nov 2025, 1,500 U.S. adults)
- Overall approval of Trump’s handling of immigration: 44% approve, 56% disapprove
- 51% want to decrease legal immigration levels, 26% keep the same, 23% increase
- Only 6% say immigration is the nation’s most important problem

- **Pew Research Center** (fieldwork 6–16 Oct 2025, released 24 Nov 2025, ~5,000 Latino adults)
- Among Latinos: 21% approve of Trump’s immigration policies, 65% disapprove
- 70% of Latinos oppose mass deportations, 68% oppose further border wall construction
- Overall Trump job approval among Latinos: 27% approve, 70% disapprove

- **KFF / New York Times** (Oct 2025, released 18 Nov 2025, 3,456 immigrant adults, weighted)
- Among immigrant respondents: 44% approve, 56% disapprove of Trump’s immigration handling
- General public sample in same poll: ~46% approve, 52% disapprove
- 78% of immigrants oppose “third-country” deportations; 82% oppose ending birthright citizenship

- **CBS News/YouGov** (29–31 Oct 2025, released early Nov, 2,124 U.S. adults)
- Net approval on immigration/border policy: –10 (47% approve, 57% disapprove)
- 51% say the administration’s immigration policies are making Americans financially worse off
- Immigration ranks as the second-most important issue for judging the administration (30%), behind the economy (43%)

- **New York Times/Siena** (late Sep 2025, referenced in mid-Nov reporting, ~1,000 registered voters)
- 54% support deporting immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally
- Broader approval of the administration’s overall aggressive immigration tactics (raids, refugee caps, etc.): ~46% approve, 52% disapprove

Key trend: While a slim majority still supports the concept of deporting illegal immigrants, overall approval of the Trump administration’s full suite of immigration policies and enforcement methods has fallen into net-negative territory since the spring of 2025, driven largely by independents and concerns about economic and humanitarian impacts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t matter how many cherry picked examples the groypers running the DHS Twitter post. “Illegal” immigrants commit less crime than U.S. citizens.

They shouldn’t be in the country. All of the crimes they commit wouldn’t happen if not for Democrats allowing open borders.

Keep telling yourself that your pathetic little life will improve when every single immigrant is gone. News flash—it won’t.

Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t matter how many cherry picked examples the groypers running the DHS Twitter post. “Illegal” immigrants commit less crime than U.S. citizens.

They shouldn’t be in the country. All of the crimes they commit wouldn’t happen if not for Democrats allowing open borders.

Anonymous wrote:Trump’s approvals on immigration are at 37%. Maybe the white nationalists in this thread should take note. The backlash to these policies is coming.

Nope, you are picking one outlier poll with the lowest number. Immigration is Trump’s best polling issue. Never mind that polls always underestimate Trump, because they oversample liberals who have nothing to do all day but talk about how much they hate Trump. If you want to see unpopular immigration policies, look at Biden’s numbers. Democrats are the ones with unpopular immigration policies. You lost the last election in big part because of those unpopular policies. Keep deluding yourselves into thinking there will be some massive backlash against Trump’s policies and people in this country will begin to believe in open borders. According to the CBS News poll, 90% of Republican voters approve of Trump’s immigration policies. Almost all who disapprove are liberals and none of us care what you think after pushing open borders and overwhelming immigration on us for four years.

Trump’s approvals on immigration are at 37%. Maybe the white nationalists in this thread should take note. The backlash to these policies is coming.

It doesn’t matter how many cherry picked examples the groypers running the DHS Twitter post. “Illegal” immigrants commit less crime than U.S. citizens.

Anonymous wrote:Sick bastard.

Another sick one.

Illegal immigration is not a victimless crime.

If you don’t like child molesters, why do you keep voting for them?

Anonymous wrote:And child molesters are not just men.

From the U.S. Sentencing Commission (USSC) — “Sexual Abuse” / child-abuse / child-pornography cases
• In the most recent USSC data (FY 2024), 93.5% of individuals sentenced for sexual abuse were men. 
• By race/ethnicity (FY 2024): 55.1% were White; 15.2% Hispanic; 13.9% Black; 13.0% Native American; 2.8% Other. 
• For cases involving production of child pornography: 67.0% of the offenders were White (in FY 2024). 
• The average age of those sentenced for sexual abuse (in that data set) was 38 years. 
• Overwhelming majority (94.8% in FY 2024) were U.S. citizens. 

Earlier years show similar patterns: e.g., in FY 2022, 93.7% of sexual-abuse offenders were men; 53.8% were White; 18.9% Black; 14.4% Hispanic; 10.5% Native American; 2.4% Other. 

For child-pornography–production offenders (FY 2019 data from USSC): about 94.3% male; 75.2% White; nearly all U.S. citizens; average age ~38. 

⸻

From the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) — on child-pornography arrests and broader child-sex-exploitation arrests
• In one national study of arrests for Internet-related crimes involving child pornography, offenders tended to be male, White, and over age 25. 
• Data from a study of commercial sexual exploitation of children (CSEC) suspects (2006–2013) found that among suspects: ~97% were male, ~82% White, ~9% Black, ~9% Hispanic, ~0.5% American Indian/Alaska Native, ~1.6% Asian/other. 
• In that study, median age at initial hearing was 39 years. 
• Regarding marital & prior-conviction status for CSEC suspects (in that same data): 70% were unmarried; 79% had no prior felony convictions; 56% had no more than a high-school education.