“President Trump wanted Attorney General William P. Barr to hold a news conference declaring the commander in chief had broken no laws during a phone call in which he pressed his Ukrainian counterpart to investigate a political rival, though Barr ultimately declined to do so, people familiar with the matter said.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-wanted-barr-to-hold-news-conference-saying-the-president-broke-no-laws-in-call-with-ukrainian-leader/2019/11/06/16d541ec-ff55-11e9-8bab-0fc209e065a8_story.html

Jennifer Williams, an aide to VP Pence, will show up for testimony on Thursday if she receives a subpoena.

Williams was on the July 25 Trump-Zelensky call and was concerned about what she heard but there's no indication Williams raised her concerns to her superiors.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/11/06/politics/jennifer-williams-testify/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Zaid has worked for whistleblowers of all stripes. Definition of non-partisan.

+1
DH has worked with him; he’s not partisan. Sorry RWNJs.

Nah. Not at all. His tweet prove it.

Jesus you all are thick. Is this the new talking point now that you had to walk back the BS claim that the whistleblower’s lawyer worked for Hillary and Schumer? Zaid is non partisan. He represented five CIA officers in Benghazi for Christ’s sake.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Zaid has worked for whistleblowers of all stripes. Definition of non-partisan.

+1
DH has worked with him; he’s not partisan. Sorry RWNJs.

Nah. Not at all. His tweet prove it.

Impervious to reality.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Zaid has worked for whistleblowers of all stripes. Definition of non-partisan.

+1
DH has worked with him; he’s not partisan. Sorry RWNJs.

Nah. Not at all. His tweet prove it.

Anonymous wrote:Zaid has worked for whistleblowers of all stripes. Definition of non-partisan.

+1
DH has worked with him; he’s not partisan. Sorry RWNJs.

Meanwhile, pretty much everything the whistleblower alleged is TRUE.

Too bad, so sad.

Anonymous wrote:Zaid has worked for whistleblowers of all stripes. Definition of non-partisan.

Sure.
He bragged about his ties to Hillary Campaign Chair John Podesta and promoted him as a key advisor on his advisory board for his front group "James Madison Project."
Definitely "nonpartisan."

http://www.jamesmadisonproject.org/board.php?director_id=8

Zaid has worked for whistleblowers of all stripes. Definition of non-partisan.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting.

This is the lawyer for the WB. His tweet a mere 10 days after Trump was inaugurated......


Mark S. Zaid
@MarkSZaidEsq
#coup has started. First of many steps. #rebellion. #impeachment will follow ultimately. #lawyers

9:54 PM · Jan 30, 2017·Twitter for Android

And, then, there is this....

This was after Trump's original Muslim Ban and Sally Yates quitting rather than enforcing it. Remember??

That's why he's responding this way to the Dana Boente tweet. The Muslim Ban was grossly unconstitutional and the "coup" and "rebellion" referred to DOJ lawyers refusing to enforce it.

Geez, you guys are so dumb. How do you get dressed in the morning?

And, yet he is "nonpartisan." Bahhahahahaha.
This whole effort is looking more and more like Russiagate 2.0.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting.

This is the lawyer for the WB. His tweet a mere 10 days after Trump was inaugurated......


Mark S. Zaid
@MarkSZaidEsq
#coup has started. First of many steps. #rebellion. #impeachment will follow ultimately. #lawyers

9:54 PM · Jan 30, 2017·Twitter for Android

And, then, there is this....

This was after Trump's original Muslim Ban and Sally Yates quitting rather than enforcing it. Remember??

That's why he's responding this way to the Dana Boente tweet. The Muslim Ban was grossly unconstitutional and the "coup" and "rebellion" referred to DOJ lawyers refusing to enforce it.

Geez, you guys are so dumb. How do you get dressed in the morning?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting.

This is the lawyer for the WB. His tweet a mere 10 days after Trump was inaugurated......


Mark S. Zaid
@MarkSZaidEsq
#coup has started. First of many steps. #rebellion. #impeachment will follow ultimately. #lawyers

9:54 PM · Jan 30, 2017·Twitter for Android

And, then, there is this....

Ah, context is everything!

Anonymous wrote:Interesting.

This is the lawyer for the WB. His tweet a mere 10 days after Trump was inaugurated......


Mark S. Zaid
@MarkSZaidEsq
#coup has started. First of many steps. #rebellion. #impeachment will follow ultimately. #lawyers

9:54 PM · Jan 30, 2017·Twitter for Android

Wasn't that the time the first whisperings about hush money started? Wasn't it at the end of Jan. '17 that a letter Stormy Daniels signed saying she didn't have an affair with Trump was made public? Point being: more than half of voters didn't want Trump and many of them were talking sh!t about impeachment out of the gate. That sentiment only grows stronger as we see his corruption, incompetence and his racism with our own eyes. Lawyers are some of his harshest critics.

Anonymous wrote:Interesting.

This is the lawyer for the WB. His tweet a mere 10 days after Trump was inaugurated......


Mark S. Zaid
@MarkSZaidEsq
#coup has started. First of many steps. #rebellion. #impeachment will follow ultimately. #lawyers

9:54 PM · Jan 30, 2017·Twitter for Android

And, then, there is this....

Interesting.

This is the lawyer for the WB. His tweet a mere 10 days after Trump was inaugurated......


Mark S. Zaid
@MarkSZaidEsq
#coup has started. First of many steps. #rebellion. #impeachment will follow ultimately. #lawyers

9:54 PM · Jan 30, 2017·Twitter for Android