Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"If Wootton were just moving buildings, the lawyer PP above would have a point that this isn’t a closure"
Agreed and to continue the baseball analogy, we are moving the Yankees to Pennsylvania, we are combining them with the Phillies, and we are naming the new team the Pennsylvania Crowns. However there is absolutely no evidence that we are closing the Yankees
This is nuts. H is basically the equivalent of moving the Yankees down the street to a new stadium, adding 5 or 6 new players to the 25-man roster over the off-season, keeping the coaching and other managment staff the same, keeping the name the same (it will still be called Wootton, guys, sheesh), etc... this has literally happened, and happens with sports teams all the time, and no one is like "They got rid of the Yankees! They're not really the Yankees anymore because they have a new stadium and some of the players changed!". That would sound idiotic and frankly all the Wootton chicken littles don't sound much better.
Reminder one more time, folks: dealing with boundary changes and school location changes is normal and not a big deal. Yeah, they don't usually happen in the same year, but are you really gonna tell us you'd be fine with option H if Wootton moved in 2027 but the boundaries didn't change until 2029? Nope, because you think you're entitled to your school staying exactly the same AND entitled to the rest of the county paying for expensive repairs to your building. Sorry guys.
Did the Yankees ask for a new stadium built for another new franchise, several miles (driving) away in another borough that is already a highly congested area? Did the fans ask for it to be there?
Are the Yankees being forced to take players from a much lower performing team or teams (or can they choose the players)?
Is the new franchise that was supposed to play there (and their fans) happy that you gave away their new stadium to the Yankees?
There are several professional sports teams that moved facilities, took on a bunch of new players, and have never been the same.
But sure, go ahead and move a championship team (school) because MCPS mismanaged taxpayer money in building Crown and see what happens. A storied franchise will be gone (even if you use the name), less top athletes will want to play for it (a new stadium doesn’t = winning), and fans (families) will abandon the franchise (go private or sell their homes).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"If Wootton were just moving buildings, the lawyer PP above would have a point that this isn’t a closure"
Agreed and to continue the baseball analogy, we are moving the Yankees to Pennsylvania, we are combining them with the Phillies, and we are naming the new team the Pennsylvania Crowns. However there is absolutely no evidence that we are closing the Yankees
This is nuts. H is basically the equivalent of moving the Yankees down the street to a new stadium, adding 5 or 6 new players to the 25-man roster over the off-season, keeping the coaching and other managment staff the same, keeping the name the same (it will still be called Wootton, guys, sheesh), etc... this has literally happened, and happens with sports teams all the time, and no one is like "They got rid of the Yankees! They're not really the Yankees anymore because they have a new stadium and some of the players changed!". That would sound idiotic and frankly all the Wootton chicken littles don't sound much better.
Reminder one more time, folks: dealing with boundary changes and school location changes is normal and not a big deal. Yeah, they don't usually happen in the same year, but are you really gonna tell us you'd be fine with option H if Wootton moved in 2027 but the boundaries didn't change until 2029? Nope, because you think you're entitled to your school staying exactly the same AND entitled to the rest of the county paying for expensive repairs to your building. Sorry guys.
Did the Yankees ask for a new stadium built for another new franchise, several miles (driving) away in another borough that is already a highly congested area? Did the fans ask for it to be there?
Are the Yankees being forced to take players from a much lower performing team or teams (or can they choose the players)?
Is the new franchise that was supposed to play there (and their fans) happy that you gave away their new stadium to the Yankees?
There are several professional sports teams that moved facilities, took on a bunch of new players, and have never been the same.
But sure, go ahead and move a championship team (school) because MCPS mismanaged taxpayer money in building Crown and see what happens. A storied franchise will be gone (even if you use the name), less top athletes will want to play for it (a new stadium doesn’t = winning), and fans (families) will abandon the franchise (go private or sell their homes).
Anonymous wrote:Outweighs mold and non-working HVAC?! Some broken restrooms? Clearly you haven’t spoken to any current students but boy your elementary school child is really lucky you’re protecting a school name over their health. Wowers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"If Wootton were just moving buildings, the lawyer PP above would have a point that this isn’t a closure"
Agreed and to continue the baseball analogy, we are moving the Yankees to Pennsylvania, we are combining them with the Phillies, and we are naming the new team the Pennsylvania Crowns. However there is absolutely no evidence that we are closing the Yankees
This is nuts. H is basically the equivalent of moving the Yankees down the street to a new stadium, adding 5 or 6 new players to the 25-man roster over the off-season, keeping the coaching and other managment staff the same, keeping the name the same (it will still be called Wootton, guys, sheesh), etc... this has literally happened, and happens with sports teams all the time, and no one is like "They got rid of the Yankees! They're not really the Yankees anymore because they have a new stadium and some of the players changed!". That would sound idiotic and frankly all the Wootton chicken littles don't sound much better.
Reminder one more time, folks: dealing with boundary changes and school location changes is normal and not a big deal. Yeah, they don't usually happen in the same year, but are you really gonna tell us you'd be fine with option H if Wootton moved in 2027 but the boundaries didn't change until 2029? Nope, because you think you're entitled to your school staying exactly the same AND entitled to the rest of the county paying for expensive repairs to your building. Sorry guys.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So Wootton campus will be sold to developers? Is that the plan? 1 million dollar townhomes I suppose.
Muldoon Farm for Bethesda soccer I suppose U15-U19….let the good times roll! (Downhill)
For those not in the soccer club: 15/20 years ago Bethesda cut a deal to use Wootton stadium for their practice field and invested 1 million in it to refurbish, given their shortsightedness in never purchasing land for proper facilities in Moco when they could have (1980-85)
For the younger player high paying families crowd they push them to a club connected family farm named Muldoon’s which runs at a slant - really it’s a glorified cow pasture.
Bethesda parents have at the meat in those two statements.
-was once in your shoes…
They can hold onto it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For Wootton families with children currently in elementary school, are you not concerned that the building could be in dire condition by the time our kids attend high school?
Yes, very concerned. That's why many people with elementary age kids in the Wootton cluster support H.
I am a parent of a Wootton cluster ES student, a new poster here. I strongly oppose option H. So is everyone else I know in our school. Our PTA wrote a letter to BOE expressing their unified objection. To me, the concern about not being able to attend Wootton, that there may be no Wootton, strongly overweighs any repair issues. This is not a school proximal to WHS.
Outweighs mold and non-working HVAC?! Some broken restrooms? Clearly you haven’t spoken to any current students but boy your elementary school child is really lucky you’re protecting a school name over their health. Wowers.
Many schools have this.
Both high schools my kids are at have locked bathrooms. I’ve had to go get them in an emergency.
Sorry I don’t know what that is - like it’s broken? This is all horrible. How are we in Montgomery county and so many schools have mold, broken HVACs and bathrooms?! And to whomever put words in my mouth earlier about not having empathy, you could not have misread me any more than you did. It’s a terrible situation all around and it is pinning families against each other like you just did. I didn’t create the options and I am a good person. Of course I’d want the new building if offered. Wouldn’t you feel the same?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For Wootton families with children currently in elementary school, are you not concerned that the building could be in dire condition by the time our kids attend high school?
Yes, very concerned. That's why many people with elementary age kids in the Wootton cluster support H.
I am a parent of a Wootton cluster ES student, a new poster here. I strongly oppose option H. So is everyone else I know in our school. Our PTA wrote a letter to BOE expressing their unified objection. To me, the concern about not being able to attend Wootton, that there may be no Wootton, strongly overweighs any repair issues. This is not a school proximal to WHS.
Outweighs mold and non-working HVAC?! Some broken restrooms? Clearly you haven’t spoken to any current students but boy your elementary school child is really lucky you’re protecting a school name over their health. Wowers.
Many schools have this.
Both high schools my kids are at have locked bathrooms. I’ve had to go get them in an emergency.
Anonymous wrote:So Wootton campus will be sold to developers? Is that the plan? 1 million dollar townhomes I suppose.
Muldoon Farm for Bethesda soccer I suppose U15-U19….let the good times roll! (Downhill)
For those not in the soccer club: 15/20 years ago Bethesda cut a deal to use Wootton stadium for their practice field and invested 1 million in it to refurbish, given their shortsightedness in never purchasing land for proper facilities in Moco when they could have (1980-85)
For the younger player high paying families crowd they push them to a club connected family farm named Muldoon’s which runs at a slant - really it’s a glorified cow pasture.
Bethesda parents have at the meat in those two statements.
-was once in your shoes…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For Wootton families with children currently in elementary school, are you not concerned that the building could be in dire condition by the time our kids attend high school?
Yes, very concerned. That's why many people with elementary age kids in the Wootton cluster support H.
I am a parent of a Wootton cluster ES student, a new poster here. I strongly oppose option H. So is everyone else I know in our school. Our PTA wrote a letter to BOE expressing their unified objection. To me, the concern about not being able to attend Wootton, that there may be no Wootton, strongly overweighs any repair issues. This is not a school proximal to WHS.
Outweighs mold and non-working HVAC?! Some broken restrooms? Clearly you haven’t spoken to any current students but boy your elementary school child is really lucky you’re protecting a school name over their health. Wowers.
Many schools have this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For Wootton families with children currently in elementary school, are you not concerned that the building could be in dire condition by the time our kids attend high school?
Yes, very concerned. That's why many people with elementary age kids in the Wootton cluster support H.
I am a parent of a Wootton cluster ES student, a new poster here. I strongly oppose option H. So is everyone else I know in our school. Our PTA wrote a letter to BOE expressing their unified objection. To me, the concern about not being able to attend Wootton, that there may be no Wootton, strongly overweighs any repair issues. This is not a school proximal to WHS.
Outweighs mold and non-working HVAC?! Some broken restrooms? Clearly you haven’t spoken to any current students but boy your elementary school child is really lucky you’re protecting a school name over their health. Wowers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For Wootton families with children currently in elementary school, are you not concerned that the building could be in dire condition by the time our kids attend high school?
Why should I be concerned if my kids don’t even get to attend Wootton
I mean. You can be concerned on behalf of others. It’s called empathy. Are you in the Wootton cluster now thinking you’ll be removed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For Wootton families with children currently in elementary school, are you not concerned that the building could be in dire condition by the time our kids attend high school?
Yes, very concerned. That's why many people with elementary age kids in the Wootton cluster support H.
I am a parent of a Wootton cluster ES student, a new poster here. I strongly oppose option H. So is everyone else I know in our school. Our PTA wrote a letter to BOE expressing their unified objection. To me, the concern about not being able to attend Wootton, that there may be no Wootton, strongly overweighs any repair issues. This is not a school proximal to WHS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For Wootton families with children currently in elementary school, are you not concerned that the building could be in dire condition by the time our kids attend high school?
Why should I be concerned if my kids don’t even get to attend Wootton