Anonymous
Anonymous
07/23/2025 22:15
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Trump admin is being attacked from the inside and they donāt know what to do. If Murdoch turns off the MAGA fox propaganda hose itās going to be a problem for the admin.
Fox News never reported on Trump's link to Epstein AT ALL. I've been checking.
It's only the independent journalists on the news side of the WSJ that have doggedly reported. NOT the Editorial Board. NOT the opinion columnists.
The person who leaked to the WSJ knew exactly what they were doing. They knew they wouldn't get traction at all from MAGA if they sent the info to NYT/WaPo et al, those liberal rags. The leaker wanted unimpeachable right-wing credentials. Rupert can and has and well continue to lean on his WSJ, but maybe he's getting old. Or maybe he's actually fine with a little Trump conflict. But I think pigs will fly before Fox turns against Trump.
FOX hates Trump. The Dominian case exposed how they all hated him, thought he was a doofus. They didn't turn on him because they didn't want to lose viewers. But if Trump is found to be guilty of this, then Fox/Murdoch can get rid of Trump once and for all.
Billionaires got their tax cuts, businesses HATE losing their workers to ICE and tariffs and Wall Street doesn't like instability.
I thought it too fantastical to think Thiel/JDMusk are shiving Trump, but this could be the case, and it's glorious.
His use is coming to an end for the tech bros, especially with this Epstein disaster. His only job is to keep a tight grip on his followers and he is unable to do that. He is making himself difficult to defend also.
Anonymous
07/23/2025 22:15
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/ronfilipkowski.bsky.social/post/3luofxcex5s2x
1. DOJ will announce Maxwell completely exonerated Trump.
2. They will lie and announce they made no deals or promises to her.
3. The deal they made with her will happen at the end of Trumpās term.
If her lawyers are any good they get a deal for now. She doesn't want to spend the next 3.5 years in jail.
Anonymous
07/23/2025 22:13
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Trump admin is being attacked from the inside and they donāt know what to do. If Murdoch turns off the MAGA fox propaganda hose itās going to be a problem for the admin.
I love this for them. Thanks for Murdoch for his attention to this matter. Though, Iām sure it will just result in him blackmailing Trump.
Good. Trump blackmails everyone else fine needs to be blackmailed.
Anonymous
07/23/2025 22:11
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Trump admin is being attacked from the inside and they donāt know what to do. If Murdoch turns off the MAGA fox propaganda hose itās going to be a problem for the admin.
Fox News never reported on Trump's link to Epstein AT ALL. I've been checking.
It's only the independent journalists on the news side of the WSJ that have doggedly reported. NOT the Editorial Board. NOT the opinion columnists.
The person who leaked to the WSJ knew exactly what they were doing. They knew they wouldn't get traction at all from MAGA if they sent the info to NYT/WaPo et al, those liberal rags. The leaker wanted unimpeachable right-wing credentials. Rupert can and has and well continue to lean on his WSJ, but maybe he's getting old. Or maybe he's actually fine with a little Trump conflict. But I think pigs will fly before Fox turns against Trump.
FOX hates Trump. The Dominian case exposed how they all hated him, thought he was a doofus. They didn't turn on him because they didn't want to lose viewers. But if Trump is found to be guilty of this, then Fox/Murdoch can get rid of Trump once and for all.
Billionaires got their tax cuts, businesses HATE losing their workers to ICE and tariffs and Wall Street doesn't like instability.
I thought it too fantastical to think Thiel/JDMusk are shiving Trump, but this could be the case, and it's glorious.
Fox will probably start soft launching someone else (JD Vance for now). Not an immediate flip but trickle it in.
Anonymous
07/23/2025 22:05
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Trump admin is being attacked from the inside and they donāt know what to do. If Murdoch turns off the MAGA fox propaganda hose itās going to be a problem for the admin.
Fox News never reported on Trump's link to Epstein AT ALL. I've been checking.
It's only the independent journalists on the news side of the WSJ that have doggedly reported. NOT the Editorial Board. NOT the opinion columnists.
The person who leaked to the WSJ knew exactly what they were doing. They knew they wouldn't get traction at all from MAGA if they sent the info to NYT/WaPo et al, those liberal rags. The leaker wanted unimpeachable right-wing credentials. Rupert can and has and well continue to lean on his WSJ, but maybe he's getting old. Or maybe he's actually fine with a little Trump conflict. But I think pigs will fly before Fox turns against Trump.
FOX hates Trump. The Dominian case exposed how they all hated him, thought he was a doofus. They didn't turn on him because they didn't want to lose viewers. But if Trump is found to be guilty of this, then Fox/Murdoch can get rid of Trump once and for all.
Billionaires got their tax cuts, businesses HATE losing their workers to ICE and tariffs and Wall Street doesn't like instability.
I thought it too fantastical to think Thiel/JDMusk are shiving Trump, but this could be the case, and it's glorious.
Anonymous
07/23/2025 21:50
Subject: Epstein Files
https://bsky.app/profile/ronfilipkowski.bsky.social/post/3luofxcex5s2x
1. DOJ will announce Maxwell completely exonerated Trump.
2. They will lie and announce they made no deals or promises to her.
3. The deal they made with her will happen at the end of Trumpās term.
1. DOJ will announce Maxwell completely exonerated Trump.
2. They will lie and announce they made no deals or promises to her.
3. The deal they made with her will happen at the end of Trumpās term.
Anonymous
07/23/2025 21:33
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
In 2016 and before it would've been bad for someone to say this in response to a Q about a POTUS.
We will likely see a mountain of even more evidence that Trump harmed girls under 18 and nothing will happen. Congress will do nothing. The voters will do nothing.
In 2016 we learned that he grabs women by the pjssy. He won the White House. He was found liable of rape. He won the White House again.
Anonymous
07/23/2025 21:30
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:The Trump admin is being attacked from the inside and they donāt know what to do. If Murdoch turns off the MAGA fox propaganda hose itās going to be a problem for the admin.
Fox News never reported on Trump's link to Epstein AT ALL. I've been checking.
It's only the independent journalists on the news side of the WSJ that have doggedly reported. NOT the Editorial Board. NOT the opinion columnists.
The person who leaked to the WSJ knew exactly what they were doing. They knew they wouldn't get traction at all from MAGA if they sent the info to NYT/WaPo et al, those liberal rags. The leaker wanted unimpeachable right-wing credentials. Rupert can and has and well continue to lean on his WSJ, but maybe he's getting old. Or maybe he's actually fine with a little Trump conflict. But I think pigs will fly before Fox turns against Trump.
Anonymous
Anonymous
07/23/2025 21:13
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BREAKING WSJ:
The Department of Justice told Trump in May that his name is IN the Epstein Files.
When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a ātruckloadā of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trumpās name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.
Link: https://www.wsj.com/politics/justice-department-told-trump-name-in-epstein-files-727a8038?mod=hp_lead_pos1
Good thing I have no idea who that is!
MAGA influencer with half a million followers
Anonymous
07/23/2025 21:09
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Brian Taylor Cohen:
BREAKING: Oversight Democrats just passed a motion in subcommittee to subpoena the DOJ to release the Epstein files. Total vote was 8-2 in favor (all Democrats voted in favor, 3 Rs for and 2 Rs against)
What would the timeline be for this?
I hope faster than she can be gotten to and have the hyoid bones in her neck broken by a supposed suicide while the cameras happen to be out and guards asleep. (Usually hyoid bone fractures only happen in strangulation and even less so with a partial suspension as was the case with Epstein).