Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still couldn't read the transcript on the House Committee's websites. (Might want to deal with that). I read about 50 pages from a media out
Et: Taylor sure had a lot of "sinking feelings" and many assumptions in the first 50 pages. I haven't found the smoking gun y'all are breathing heavy about. I'll prep dinner and keep reading. No dog, unicorn or Pegasus in this snoozer so far though. A few good laughs through page 12 though.

Taylor said he got his info from (wait for it) a NYT article.

He also testified that he asks a person from OMB why the aid is being held up and is told that the order came directly from the President through his Chief of Staff

Zelenskyy is the Ukrainian president..

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nice to see CNN was willing to be the mouthpiece for Trump forcing Zerlinskyy into an investigation announcement.

Heads should roll for this (at CNN)

What shows that CNN was involved?

The Taylor transcript. As September was ending (and thus the funding for Ukraine,) Trump was at the UN , remember that press conference with Zalenskyy? They were trying to squeeze him to make an announcement and had arranged for an appearance on CNN to make it happen. The Whistleblower complaint was made public and then the funds were quickly released, but sheesh, CNN, really?

Is there any reason you keep misspelling “Zelensky”? Are you confused between Zelensky from Poland and Zelinsky from the Stone trial or are you just doing a bit?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still couldn't read the transcript on the House Committee's websites. (Might want to deal with that). I read about 50 pages from a media out
Et: Taylor sure had a lot of "sinking feelings" and many assumptions in the first 50 pages. I haven't found the smoking gun y'all are breathing heavy about. I'll prep dinner and keep reading. No dog, unicorn or Pegasus in this snoozer so far though. A few good laughs through page 12 though.

Taylor said he got his info from (wait for it) a NYT article.

Was the NYT article right?

Yes it was.

Anonymous wrote:I still couldn't read the transcript on the House Committee's websites. (Might want to deal with that). I read about 50 pages from a media out
Et: Taylor sure had a lot of "sinking feelings" and many assumptions in the first 50 pages. I haven't found the smoking gun y'all are breathing heavy about. I'll prep dinner and keep reading. No dog, unicorn or Pegasus in this snoozer so far though. A few good laughs through page 12 though.

Wasn't he there for 10 hours? There's going to be lots of boring stuff. That's why he'll have a public hearing next week that will be targeted to the important stuff.

But sure, read all of his 10 hours of testimony. To be informed.

Anonymous wrote:I still couldn't read the transcript on the House Committee's websites. (Might want to deal with that). I read about 50 pages from a media out
Et: Taylor sure had a lot of "sinking feelings" and many assumptions in the first 50 pages. I haven't found the smoking gun y'all are breathing heavy about. I'll prep dinner and keep reading. No dog, unicorn or Pegasus in this snoozer so far though. A few good laughs through page 12 though.

Taylor said he got his info from (wait for it) a NYT article.

I still couldn't read the transcript on the House Committee's websites. (Might want to deal with that). I read about 50 pages from a media out
Et: Taylor sure had a lot of "sinking feelings" and many assumptions in the first 50 pages. I haven't found the smoking gun y'all are breathing heavy about. I'll prep dinner and keep reading. No dog, unicorn or Pegasus in this snoozer so far though. A few good laughs through page 12 though.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nice to see CNN was willing to be the mouthpiece for Trump forcing Zerlinskyy into an investigation announcement.

Heads should roll for this (at CNN)

What shows that CNN was involved?

The Taylor transcript. As September was ending (and thus the funding for Ukraine,) Trump was at the UN , remember that press conference with Zalenskyy? They were trying to squeeze him to make an announcement and had arranged for an appearance on CNN to make it happen. The Whistleblower complaint was made public and then the funds were quickly released, but sheesh, CNN, really?

CNN arranging an interview with Zelensky doesn’t make them complicit in this plan.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nice to see CNN was willing to be the mouthpiece for Trump forcing Zerlinskyy into an investigation announcement.

Heads should roll for this (at CNN)

What shows that CNN was involved?

The Taylor transcript. As September was ending (and thus the funding for Ukraine,) Trump was at the UN , remember that press conference with Zalenskyy? They were trying to squeeze him to make an announcement and had arranged for an appearance on CNN to make it happen. The Whistleblower complaint was made public and then the funds were quickly released, but sheesh, CNN, really?

Anonymous wrote:Nice to see CNN was willing to be the mouthpiece for Trump forcing Zerlinskyy into an investigation announcement.

Heads should roll for this (at CNN)

Huh?

Seems one of the main goals of the impeachment hearings was one of the same goals of the Mueller investigation....
-
-
-
-
-
-
To employ Washington DC lawyers.

Anonymous wrote:Nice to see CNN was willing to be the mouthpiece for Trump forcing Zerlinskyy into an investigation announcement.

Heads should roll for this (at CNN)

What shows that CNN was involved?

Nice to see CNN was willing to be the mouthpiece for Trump forcing Zerlinskyy into an investigation announcement.

Heads should roll for this (at CNN)

Ask yourself why the committee took into consideration witnesses requested redactions that fall outside the grammatical, typographical and technical corrections.

Why do the transcripts list members who were present but, not necessarily reflect the attendance of all Members who may have joined or departed at different points.

I'm having trouble getting the doc to read through and can only read the excerpts.

So, no, I have no confidence in what has been presented (I have yet to be able to see the doc) in the mainstream media's Fantasy Island.

Maybe some opinions are not rooted in any facts, whatsoever.