Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some players aren't good enough to play GA and should be moved to aspire or be told so they can go elsewhere the club should stop playing favoritism to legacy club players who don't earn their spot. Many work hard to have skills and others just showing up. Every player probably wants to know where they stand in the coaches eyes. More discretion should be used on new players too as some are being given roster spots who clearly should not be.
They don't play favorites to legacy VRSC players, they are legacy FCV players who aren't good enough. There are plenty of 2nd teams players that deserve GA spots over the girls that came from FCV.
Well, I'll be! You hit the nail on the head. It's those FCV players, I tell ya. They keep gettin' chance after chance, bein' made captains and whatnot, while the gals who were originally in the club don't get the same shot. It's like this club's turnin' into FCV 2.0, y'all.
In almost every case on every team, the FCV players destroy the legacy players in skill, ability and iq of the game. If you're the parent complaining about this situation, your DD is likely the one who will be booted if it has not already happened. Some of these players who were mistakenly given GA1 spots during the confusion are already gone. Fortunately for the reasonable players (and parents), there will be a viable second option with Aspire this year.
Anonymous wrote:Yep..we are in a similar position. If she does not get her GA1 official offer from VRSC by Tuesday, we will be forced to take another GA1 offer elsewhere. It would be a shame because she wants to stay.
Anonymous wrote:Yep..we are in a similar position. If she does not get her GA1 official offer from VRSC by Tuesday, we will be forced to take another GA1 offer elsewhere. It would be a shame because she wants to stay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some players aren't good enough to play GA and should be moved to aspire or be told so they can go elsewhere the club should stop playing favoritism to legacy club players who don't earn their spot. Many work hard to have skills and others just showing up. Every player probably wants to know where they stand in the coaches eyes. More discretion should be used on new players too as some are being given roster spots who clearly should not be.
They don't play favorites to legacy VRSC players, they are legacy FCV players who aren't good enough. There are plenty of 2nd teams players that deserve GA spots over the girls that came from FCV.
That’s laughable🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. It will be a great way to destroy the club. 5-6 players on each team must be moved down or these teams will remain uncompetitive. Now we know why the players adds have been sooooo poor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some players aren't good enough to play GA and should be moved to aspire or be told so they can go elsewhere the club should stop playing favoritism to legacy club players who don't earn their spot. Many work hard to have skills and others just showing up. Every player probably wants to know where they stand in the coaches eyes. More discretion should be used on new players too as some are being given roster spots who clearly should not be.
They don't play favorites to legacy VRSC players, they are legacy FCV players who aren't good enough. There are plenty of 2nd teams players that deserve GA spots over the girls that came from FCV.
Well, I'll be! You hit the nail on the head. It's those FCV players, I tell ya. They keep gettin' chance after chance, bein' made captains and whatnot, while the gals who were originally in the club don't get the same shot. It's like this club's turnin' into FCV 2.0, y'all.
Anonymous wrote:Yep..we are in a similar position. If she does not get her GA1 official offer from VRSC by Tuesday, we will be forced to take another GA1 offer elsewhere. It would be a shame because she wants to stay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are on the same boat as you. DD has an offer from another GA team. We would love to stay with Rev,however our coach have not say anything about next year and who will be offer a spot.
We are in this same position. Our DD received an offer from NVA and SYC for GA1. She prefers to stay with her team, but doesn’t know where she stands. They are telling us we have to let them know this week.
In reality if u haven’t responded within 48 hrs VRSC will dispose of u like a used napkin
are you not following the comments? VRSC hasn't told them anything and they have to accept/reject the offers from NVA/SYC this week. So should they stay at VRSC and assume they have a spot or accept NVA/SYC's offer?
I don't know the typical communication at VRSC, but if they're not letting you know if you're on the team next year, it might be best to take the other offer. The whole a bird in the hand is worth 2 in the bush...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some players aren't good enough to play GA and should be moved to aspire or be told so they can go elsewhere the club should stop playing favoritism to legacy club players who don't earn their spot. Many work hard to have skills and others just showing up. Every player probably wants to know where they stand in the coaches eyes. More discretion should be used on new players too as some are being given roster spots who clearly should not be.
They don't play favorites to legacy VRSC players, they are legacy FCV players who aren't good enough. There are plenty of 2nd teams players that deserve GA spots over the girls that came from FCV.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are on the same boat as you. DD has an offer from another GA team. We would love to stay with Rev,however our coach have not say anything about next year and who will be offer a spot.
We are in this same position. Our DD received an offer from NVA and SYC for GA1. She prefers to stay with her team, but doesn’t know where she stands. They are telling us we have to let them know this week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are on the same boat as you. DD has an offer from another GA team. We would love to stay with Rev,however our coach have not say anything about next year and who will be offer a spot.
We are in this same position. Our DD received an offer from NVA and SYC for GA1. She prefers to stay with her team, but doesn’t know where she stands. They are telling us we have to let them know this week.
In reality if u haven’t responded within 48 hrs VRSC will dispose of u like a used napkin
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are on the same boat as you. DD has an offer from another GA team. We would love to stay with Rev,however our coach have not say anything about next year and who will be offer a spot.
We are in this same position. Our DD received an offer from NVA and SYC for GA1. She prefers to stay with her team, but doesn’t know where she stands. They are telling us we have to let them know this week.
Anonymous wrote:We are on the same boat as you. DD has an offer from another GA team. We would love to stay with Rev,however our coach have not say anything about next year and who will be offer a spot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some players aren't good enough to play GA and should be moved to aspire or be told so they can go elsewhere the club should stop playing favoritism to legacy club players who don't earn their spot. Many work hard to have skills and others just showing up. Every player probably wants to know where they stand in the coaches eyes. More discretion should be used on new players too as some are being given roster spots who clearly should not be.
They don't play favorites to legacy VRSC players, they are legacy FCV players who aren't good enough. There are plenty of 2nd teams players that deserve GA spots over the girls that came from FCV.
Anonymous wrote:Some players aren't good enough to play GA and should be moved to aspire or be told so they can go elsewhere the club should stop playing favoritism to legacy club players who don't earn their spot. Many work hard to have skills and others just showing up. Every player probably wants to know where they stand in the coaches eyes. More discretion should be used on new players too as some are being given roster spots who clearly should not be.