Anonymous wrote:
It's so crazy how people will defend the vile and indefensible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They're all weirdos. If Cassie was afraid of being killed by combs so much wasn't participating and the urinal roleplay with strangers an aids/std/herpes ticket anyway?
One major obstacle for the prosecution to overcome is Cassie’s clear and obvious consent during sexual activity involving Combs.
Cassie was not paid to have the escorts urinate into her mouth and on her body while Combs watched. It’s apparent she wanted this, or was at a minimum, a willing participant. While this performance is shocking to some, it’s hardly unknown and increasingly not an unusual kink. Moreover, Combs was merely a passive observer when Cassie did this.
Similarly, it’s unclear whether Cassie was assaulted by Combs or, conversely, the strikes were part of BDSM and were desired by Cassie.
I think they are focusing on the wrong victim here; and it’s clear Combs victimized many (particularly young boys).
Page 154 and you are still not arguing the actual charges.
NP here.
Not everyone can be as legal minded as you. Conversations will go off topic, and that's what makes this conversation interesting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They're all weirdos. If Cassie was afraid of being killed by combs so much wasn't participating and the urinal roleplay with strangers an aids/std/herpes ticket anyway?
One major obstacle for the prosecution to overcome is Cassie’s clear and obvious consent during sexual activity involving Combs.
Cassie was not paid to have the escorts urinate into her mouth and on her body while Combs watched. It’s apparent she wanted this, or was at a minimum, a willing participant. While this performance is shocking to some, it’s hardly unknown and increasingly not an unusual kink. Moreover, Combs was merely a passive observer when Cassie did this.
Similarly, it’s unclear whether Cassie was assaulted by Combs or, conversely, the strikes were part of BDSM and were desired by Cassie.
I think they are focusing on the wrong victim here; and it’s clear Combs victimized many (particularly young boys).
Page 154 and you are still not arguing the actual charges.
NP here.
Not everyone can be as legal minded as you. Conversations will go off topic, and that's what makes this conversation interesting.
Having no clue what the charges are is not "going off topic," it's just being wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They're all weirdos. If Cassie was afraid of being killed by combs so much wasn't participating and the urinal roleplay with strangers an aids/std/herpes ticket anyway?
One major obstacle for the prosecution to overcome is Cassie’s clear and obvious consent during sexual activity involving Combs.
Cassie was not paid to have the escorts urinate into her mouth and on her body while Combs watched. It’s apparent she wanted this, or was at a minimum, a willing participant. While this performance is shocking to some, it’s hardly unknown and increasingly not an unusual kink. Moreover, Combs was merely a passive observer when Cassie did this.
Similarly, it’s unclear whether Cassie was assaulted by Combs or, conversely, the strikes were part of BDSM and were desired by Cassie.
I think they are focusing on the wrong victim here; and it’s clear Combs victimized many (particularly young boys).
Page 154 and you are still not arguing the actual charges.
NP here.
Not everyone can be as legal minded as you. Conversations will go off topic, and that's what makes this conversation interesting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It's so crazy how people will defend the vile and indefensible.
You mean like those that are defending Cassie for her stupidity?
Yeah yeah SHE SHOULD BE ON TRIAL JUSTICE FOR PUFF!!!!! /s
Karma means a sex worker may piss in your kids mouth when stuck in an abusive relationship.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It's so crazy how people will defend the vile and indefensible.
You mean like those that are defending Cassie for her stupidity?
Yeah yeah SHE SHOULD BE ON TRIAL JUSTICE FOR PUFF!!!!! /s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It's so crazy how people will defend the vile and indefensible.
You mean like those that are defending Cassie for her stupidity?
Anonymous wrote:
It's so crazy how people will defend the vile and indefensible.
+100 I don't think this person has read this thread at all or paid attention to any of the testimony.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They're all weirdos. If Cassie was afraid of being killed by combs so much wasn't participating and the urinal roleplay with strangers an aids/std/herpes ticket anyway?
One major obstacle for the prosecution to overcome is Cassie’s clear and obvious consent during sexual activity involving Combs.
Cassie was not paid to have the escorts urinate into her mouth and on her body while Combs watched. It’s apparent she wanted this, or was at a minimum, a willing participant. While this performance is shocking to some, it’s hardly unknown and increasingly not an unusual kink. Moreover, Combs was merely a passive observer when Cassie did this.
Similarly, it’s unclear whether Cassie was assaulted by Combs or, conversely, the strikes were part of BDSM and were desired by Cassie.
I think they are focusing on the wrong victim here; and it’s clear Combs victimized many (particularly young boys).
Page 154 and you are still not arguing the actual charges.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They're all weirdos. If Cassie was afraid of being killed by combs so much wasn't participating and the urinal roleplay with strangers an aids/std/herpes ticket anyway?
One major obstacle for the prosecution to overcome is Cassie’s clear and obvious consent during sexual activity involving Combs.
Cassie was not paid to have the escorts urinate into her mouth and on her body while Combs watched. It’s apparent she wanted this, or was at a minimum, a willing participant. While this performance is shocking to some, it’s hardly unknown and increasingly not an unusual kink. Moreover, Combs was merely a passive observer when Cassie did this.
Similarly, it’s unclear whether Cassie was assaulted by Combs or, conversely, the strikes were part of BDSM and were desired by Cassie.
I think they are focusing on the wrong victim here; and it’s clear Combs victimized many (particularly young boys).
Page 154 and you are still not arguing the actual charges.