However, Fairfax County Police Chief Kevin Davis told NBC Washington that he expects "that we will eventually be able to hold more than just one person accountable for this crime."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If this is true it changes the entire narrative.
That BB used a ruse and lure to get JR in house to try to frame him for CB's death?
No, these are just the details of the ruse and lure. C*ck scenarios are usually the husband's idea, even when not a Mark Winger style plot. It may have been keyed off the date of BB's birthday, day before. Finding and luring JR, instigating knife play, something JR had never done, taking AP to gun range, buying non-
service gun, etc. all parts of the plan. CB may have thought she was doing this for BB. See thread in Relationship forum where posters try to browbeat an upset and uncomfortable DW to do so, saying it will bring them closer and she is wrong to feel like it is cheating.
All of the details would have been worked out between JR, CB and BB. Only JR and CB were not aware of BB's true motives, to replace CB with AP, with whom he had an ongoing affair, to frame JR and to eliminate him as a witness.
That makes more sense. I too believe BB planned all that. He is LE, he knows how crime investigation works. He took his time and must have thought and orchestrated every single detail. That’s why it’s taking time for the police to get in. But eventually they will.
As a former prosecutor who knows the mindset of law enforcement well, I can assure that they are very, very keen to get this dirtbag and put him away forever. Nothing fires up LEOs more than a rogue LEO who thinks he is smarter than his brethren and entitled to a free pass on the worst of crimes.
Ok but to be fair, BB was an IRS agent not a criminal investigator.
See info re: training of IRS Special Agents above. He did have criminal investigator training.
There are a lot of different crimes. Murder is one of many. He may not have learned about murder investigations at the IRS criminal investigations training.
He knew a lot more about criminal investigations and electronic forensics than the average lay person. He wasn't some CPA is the point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone in this thread who is mentioning that about JR had no history of harming people, but neither did BB or AP. Also there is zero evidence that BB was doing any type of manipulation to anybody. I’m sure if there was, prosecutors would’ve added that to the evidence.
I find it hard to believe that someone who is so “manipulative” never sent a text message to his wife with the “manipulation” in it. You are telling me to believe that there’s zero texts of manipulation or chats with his wife discussing this cuck scenario he wanted?
Also, why would the wife use an encrypted secret chat program, if she didn’t care about her husband finding out?
Do the chats between CB and JR mention any type of cuck scenario? Because there is zero evidence that this was a cuck scenario, just speculation from one person mentioning it on the forum.
The people posting this crap spinning the husband up as a guilty party are completely deranged.
I would imagine they are friends or somehow connected to JR or have some kind of personal beef with the husband.
They are spinning up all kinds of insane theories without any basis of facts or evidence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think the gun(s) were part of the role play plan.
Do you think Joe was in on the part of the plan where BB arrives home to "save" his wife? If yes, that would be easy to prove because it would be in the messages sent between the CB account and Joe. If no, then CB would need to agree to a plan where she lured a stranger with a knife to her house to have her unarmed husband arrive to save her.
I think BB didn't know about Joe. The AP catches CB/Joe and calls BB. BB arrives and confronts them. Joe stabs CB, BB shots Joe, AP watches. While BB is trying to save CB, AP shots Joe
Now why the second gun? Maybe BB was trained to never turn his service weapon over to anyone so he asks AP to grab the second gun.
Why is Joe referred to as a victim? Because he was invited to the house and asked to bring a knife. He was shot while incapacitated on the floor
Why did LE question if CB was the one who used the account? Because friends and family believe it would be out of character for her to engage in sex fantasies with a stranger, especially involving a knife. I think a lot of families and friends would be surprised by what goes on behind closed doors.
This is all speculation but I can now see a situation where it all fits together after the new facts were revealed this week.
motive?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think the gun(s) were part of the role play plan.
Do you think Joe was in on the part of the plan where BB arrives home to "save" his wife? If yes, that would be easy to prove because it would be in the messages sent between the CB account and Joe. If no, then CB would need to agree to a plan where she lured a stranger with a knife to her house to have her unarmed husband arrive to save her.
I think BB didn't know about Joe. The AP catches CB/Joe and calls BB. BB arrives and confronts them. Joe stabs CB, BB shots Joe, AP watches. While BB is trying to save CB, AP shots Joe
Now why the second gun? Maybe BB was trained to never turn his service weapon over to anyone so he asks AP to grab the second gun.
Why is Joe referred to as a victim? Because he was invited to the house and asked to bring a knife. He was shot while incapacitated on the floor
Why did LE question if CB was the one who used the account? Because friends and family believe it would be out of character for her to engage in sex fantasies with a stranger, especially involving a knife. I think a lot of families and friends would be surprised by what goes on behind closed doors.
This is all speculation but I can now see a situation where it all fits together after the new facts were revealed this week.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone in this thread who is mentioning that about JR had no history of harming people, but neither did BB or AP. Also there is zero evidence that BB was doing any type of manipulation to anybody. I’m sure if there was, prosecutors would’ve added that to the evidence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think the gun(s) were part of the role play plan.
Do you think Joe was in on the part of the plan where BB arrives home to "save" his wife? If yes, that would be easy to prove because it would be in the messages sent between the CB account and Joe. If no, then CB would need to agree to a plan where she lured a stranger with a knife to her house to have her unarmed husband arrive to save her.
I think BB didn't know about Joe. The AP catches CB/Joe and calls BB. BB arrives and confronts them. Joe stabs CB, BB shots Joe, AP watches. While BB is trying to save CB, AP shots Joe
Now why the second gun? Maybe BB was trained to never turn his service weapon over to anyone so he asks AP to grab the second gun.
Why is Joe referred to as a victim? Because he was invited to the house and asked to bring a knife. He was shot while incapacitated on the floor
Why did LE question if CB was the one who used the account? Because friends and family believe it would be out of character for her to engage in sex fantasies with a stranger, especially involving a knife. I think a lot of families and friends would be surprised by what goes on behind closed doors.
This is all speculation but I can now see a situation where it all fits together after the new facts were revealed this week.
motive?
Anonymous wrote:Everyone in this thread who is mentioning that about JR had no history of harming people, but neither did BB or AP. Also there is zero evidence that BB was doing any type of manipulation to anybody. I’m sure if there was, prosecutors would’ve added that to the evidence.
I find it hard to believe that someone who is so “manipulative” never sent a text message to his wife with the “manipulation” in it. You are telling me to believe that there’s zero texts of manipulation or chats with his wife discussing this cuck scenario he wanted?
Also, why would the wife use an encrypted secret chat program, if she didn’t care about her husband finding out?
Do the chats between CB and JR mention any type of cuck scenario? Because there is zero evidence that this was a cuck scenario, just speculation from one person mentioning it on the forum.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone in this thread who is mentioning that about JR had no history of harming people, but neither did BB or AP. Also there is zero evidence that BB was doing any type of manipulation to anybody. I’m sure if there was, prosecutors would’ve added that to the evidence.
I find it hard to believe that someone who is so “manipulative” never sent a text message to his wife with the “manipulation” in it. You are telling me to believe that there’s zero texts of manipulation or chats with his wife discussing this cuck scenario he wanted?
Also, why would the wife use an encrypted secret chat program, if she didn’t care about her husband finding out?
Do the chats between CB and JR mention any type of cuck scenario? Because there is zero evidence that this was a cuck scenario, just speculation from one person mentioning it on the forum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think the gun(s) were part of the role play plan.
Do you think Joe was in on the part of the plan where BB arrives home to "save" his wife? If yes, that would be easy to prove because it would be in the messages sent between the CB account and Joe. If no, then CB would need to agree to a plan where she lured a stranger with a knife to her house to have her unarmed husband arrive to save her.
I think BB didn't know about Joe. The AP catches CB/Joe and calls BB. BB arrives and confronts them. Joe stabs CB, BB shots Joe, AP watches. While BB is trying to save CB, AP shots Joe
Now why the second gun? Maybe BB was trained to never turn his service weapon over to anyone so he asks AP to grab the second gun.
Why is Joe referred to as a victim? Because he was invited to the house and asked to bring a knife. He was shot while incapacitated on the floor
Why did LE question if CB was the one who used the account? Because friends and family believe it would be out of character for her to engage in sex fantasies with a stranger, especially involving a knife. I think a lot of families and friends would be surprised by what goes on behind closed doors.
This is all speculation but I can now see a situation where it all fits together after the new facts were revealed this week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think the gun(s) were part of the role play plan.
I think BB didn't know about Joe. The AP catches CB/Joe and calls BB. BB arrives and confronts them. Joe stabs CB, BB shots Joe, AP watches. While BB is trying to save CB, AP shots Joe
Now why the second gun? Maybe BB was trained to never turn his service weapon over to anyone so he asks AP to grab the second gun.
Why is Joe referred to as a victim? Because he was invited to the house and asked to bring a knife. He was shot while incapacitated on the floor
Why did LE question if CB was the one who used the account? Because friends and family believe it would be out of character for her to engage in sex fantasies with a stranger, especially involving a knife. I think a lot of families and friends would be surprised by what goes on behind closed doors.
This is all speculation but I can now see a situation where it all fits together after the new facts were revealed this week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think the gun(s) were part of the role play plan.
Do you think Joe was in on the part of the plan where BB arrives home to "save" his wife? If yes, that would be easy to prove because it would be in the messages sent between the CB account and Joe. If no, then CB would need to agree to a plan where she lured a stranger with a knife to her house to have her unarmed husband arrive to save her.
I think BB didn't know about Joe. The AP catches CB/Joe and calls BB. BB arrives and confronts them. Joe stabs CB, BB shots Joe, AP watches. While BB is trying to save CB, AP shots Joe
Now why the second gun? Maybe BB was trained to never turn his service weapon over to anyone so he asks AP to grab the second gun.
Why is Joe referred to as a victim? Because he was invited to the house and asked to bring a knife. He was shot while incapacitated on the floor
Why did LE question if CB was the one who used the account? Because friends and family believe it would be out of character for her to engage in sex fantasies with a stranger, especially involving a knife. I think a lot of families and friends would be surprised by what goes on behind closed doors.
This is all speculation but I can now see a situation where it all fits together after the new facts were revealed this week.
The bolded statement is not true. It is not necessary for CB to agree to BB pulling out his gun. It is not necessary for JR to know about a gun being part of the situation. CB and JR might have thought that the plan was to "role play" a rape-type scene that BB either wanted to watch, or that BB would interrupt by "saving" CB. Maybe CB and JR thought there would be a "role play" fight b/c BB and JR. Nobody HAD to know about the gun except BB -- who knew that he was going to bring the gun so that he could shoot JR.