Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The rest of that story is that Biden was in this from the beginning and didn’t hear about it ‘when we did, through the media’. His administration waived Trump’s executive privilege. That will probably go to the SC. Given the history of the FBI targeting, I know how that will probably go
Source for these claims?
Idiot PP took the bait. Trumpy “journalist” John Solomon was given the OK to release the letter to get his base all riled up about Biden. But what the letter actually does reveal is hideously bad for Trump.
There is no bait to take. What I said was true. Garland said it was all him and the Biden administration claimed they had nothing to do with it.
The raid, dummy. Biden said he had nothing to do with the raid. That is different than the substance of the underlying dispute. Really people stop creating false disputes.
Ah, so Biden found out about it when we did?
The raid? Yes. Unless you have some proof that Biden is lying.
Anonymous wrote:what is TFG?
Anonymous wrote:“The previously unreported email — sent about 100 days after the former president left office with the subject line “Need for Assistance re Presidential Records” — shows just how early Archives officials realized that many documents were missing from the Trump White House. It also illustrates the myriad efforts Archives officials made to have the documents returned over an 18-month period, culminating with an FBI raid earlier this month at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida.”
New from the Post:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/08/24/trump-records-archives-2021/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Evan Corcoran is a partner in his firm (the Baltimore firm with the name Slutkin in it which is the only name I remember) and was an Assistant US State’s Attorney. Why he wants to besmirch his formerly good name is an interesting question to me.
Honestly, this question is one of the biggest mysteries of the entire Trump era.
This. The list of people who previously were reasonably well thought of who will now be remembered as disgraces is pretty astonishing. Lindsay Graham, Marco Rubio, William Barr, Rudy Giuliani, Michael Flynn, and on and on, including Trump himself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The rest of that story is that Biden was in this from the beginning and didn’t hear about it ‘when we did, through the media’. His administration waived Trump’s executive privilege. That will probably go to the SC. Given the history of the FBI targeting, I know how that will probably go
Source for these claims?
Idiot PP took the bait. Trumpy “journalist” John Solomon was given the OK to release the letter to get his base all riled up about Biden. But what the letter actually does reveal is hideously bad for Trump.
There is no bait to take. What I said was true. Garland said it was all him and the Biden administration claimed they had nothing to do with it.
The raid, dummy. Biden said he had nothing to do with the raid. That is different than the substance of the underlying dispute. Really people stop creating false disputes.
Ah, so Biden found out about it when we did?
The raid? Yes. Unless you have some proof that Biden is lying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The rest of that story is that Biden was in this from the beginning and didn’t hear about it ‘when we did, through the media’. His administration waived Trump’s executive privilege. That will probably go to the SC. Given the history of the FBI targeting, I know how that will probably go
Source for these claims?
Idiot PP took the bait. Trumpy “journalist” John Solomon was given the OK to release the letter to get his base all riled up about Biden. But what the letter actually does reveal is hideously bad for Trump.
There is no bait to take. What I said was true. Garland said it was all him and the Biden administration claimed they had nothing to do with it.
The raid, dummy. Biden said he had nothing to do with the raid. That is different than the substance of the underlying dispute. Really people stop creating false disputes.
Ah, so Biden found out about it when we did?
The raid? Yes. Unless you have some proof that Biden is lying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Evan Corcoran is a partner in his firm (the Baltimore firm with the name Slutkin in it which is the only name I remember) and was an Assistant US State’s Attorney. Why he wants to besmirch his formerly good name is an interesting question to me.
Honestly, this question is one of the biggest mysteries of the entire Trump era.
This. The list of people who previously were reasonably well thought of who will now be remembered as disgraces is pretty astonishing. Lindsay Graham, Marco Rubio, William Barr, Rudy Giuliani, Michael Flynn, and on and on, including Trump himself.
Kompromat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The rest of that story is that Biden was in this from the beginning and didn’t hear about it ‘when we did, through the media’. His administration waived Trump’s executive privilege. That will probably go to the SC. Given the history of the FBI targeting, I know how that will probably go
Source for these claims?
Idiot PP took the bait. Trumpy “journalist” John Solomon was given the OK to release the letter to get his base all riled up about Biden. But what the letter actually does reveal is hideously bad for Trump.
There is no bait to take. What I said was true. Garland said it was all him and the Biden administration claimed they had nothing to do with it.
The raid, dummy. Biden said he had nothing to do with the raid. That is different than the substance of the underlying dispute. Really people stop creating false disputes.
Ah, so Biden found out about it when we did?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The rest of that story is that Biden was in this from the beginning and didn’t hear about it ‘when we did, through the media’. His administration waived Trump’s executive privilege. That will probably go to the SC. Given the history of the FBI targeting, I know how that will probably go
Source for these claims?
Idiot PP took the bait. Trumpy “journalist” John Solomon was given the OK to release the letter to get his base all riled up about Biden. But what the letter actually does reveal is hideously bad for Trump.
There is no bait to take. What I said was true. Garland said it was all him and the Biden administration claimed they had nothing to do with it.
The raid, dummy. Biden said he had nothing to do with the raid. That is different than the substance of the underlying dispute. Really people stop creating false disputes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This Trump judge is going to issue a broad PI that effectively stops the criminal investigation if FBI has not finished reviewing. She will then take lots of time to consider whether to appoint a special master and then will eventually appoint one. She’s setting that up here. Hope FBI is going overtime to get these docs reviewed.
The court would have to find jurisdiction, whether pursuant to the federal question statute or a discretionary anomalous jurisdiction wrt materials siezed pursuant to the warrant. The problem is that the documents do not belong to Trump, rather they are the property of the US Government acting through NARA by automatic operation of law in accordance with the Presidential Records Act. And any purported claim of “executive privilege” is a red herring insofar as it is the executive branch, specifically, DOJ acting on behalf of NARA, which has siezed the materials. It would be a different matter if it had been the J6C that had subpoenaed the materials. The issue of “declassification” is likewise a distraction to the extent that liability arising under the Espionage Act depends on whether the material relates to the defense of the US, not it’s classification status. Although it certainly raises other concerns among stakeholders such as CIA, DIA and NSA.
In short, it would be nearing the level of impeachable judicial bad faith were the court to find that Trump will suffer irreparable injury if NARA failed to return documents that should have no longer been in his possession post 1/20/2021, particularly when there will be substantial evidence of deception and obstruction mitigating against an award of any form of equitable relief. NARA as the lawful possessor of the siezed materials has release a compelling statement of its position in the form of the letter sent back in May and the suggestion apoears to be that boxes stored in a basement (and hidden in the closet of Trump’s office) were being removed and replaced by unidentified people with some frequency. There’s not much for a Special Master to do at this juncture. No doubt the taint team has completed its review
Have you seen the crazy stuff coming out of the Fifth Circuit? Or the 11th circuit in the Lindsey Graham case? Trump judges do not care what the law is. And they certainly don’t fear impeachment. There is zero chance they get impeached and removed and they know it.
Is a district court judge willing to burn her career to the ground on this? Or does she want to serve on a higher court? Time will tell.