Anonymous
07/23/2025 20:28
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Did the judge say No files unless there is a whole new investigation? Is that what is happening?
No, the judge said that for the cases she handled grand jury information always remains secret per Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure with very few exceptions, and “the President wants this” is not an acceptable exception.
Anonymous
07/23/2025 20:26
Subject: Epstein Files
Haven’t been home to watch the new yet but do they even care about the whole Obama Russia Interference thing? It seems like none of the distractions are sticking.
Anonymous
07/23/2025 20:20
Subject: Epstein Files
Did the judge say No files unless there is a whole new investigation? Is that what is happening?
Anonymous
07/23/2025 20:01
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So Musk called it: Trump was in the Epstein files. I guess he was in the meeting when Bondi told him.
Do you think he is the leaker? It has to be a close insider right?
Thought the leaker is Bongino.
This wouldn’t surprise me, he seems like the weakest link in the chain
Anonymous
07/23/2025 19:40
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
yeah MAGAs, regardless of who blocked who in the past, what about now? Don't you want to bring down Clinton and Gates anymore?
Anonymous
07/23/2025 19:37
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:In 2023, when Marsha Blackburn tried to subpoena the Epstein flight logs, Democrat Dick Durbin BLOCKED it.
For four years under Biden, Democrats said and did NOTHING.
So do you want it released or do you not want it to be released?
We can’t tell at this point.
Anonymous
07/23/2025 19:36
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:In 2023, when Marsha Blackburn tried to subpoena the Epstein flight logs, Democrat Dick Durbin BLOCKED it.
For four years under Biden, Democrats said and did NOTHING.
Did you not read the prior post?
Anonymous
07/23/2025 19:33
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Brian Taylor Cohen:
BREAKING: Oversight Democrats just passed a motion in subcommittee to subpoena the DOJ to release the Epstein files. Total vote was 8-2 in favor (all Democrats voted in favor, 3 Rs for and 2 Rs against)
This is good, though it would have been better if Republicans had been willing to defy Trump a few weeks ago.
True but the people in charge needed him to get that America killing bill passed. No they did. There’s no need for him anymore.
Anonymous
07/23/2025 19:28
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:For those asking why didn't Biden/Dems do more, they did!
In February 2024—when Democrats controlled the Senate—Senator Wyden sought info on Epstein's finances from the Biden administration—and that he got access to it.
He actively moved to get the Senate to subpoena their release. Because Finance Committee rules require bipartisan support for subpoenas, Wyden sought the backing of several GOP senators on the committee, including now-chairman Mike Crapo and Marsha Blackburn. But none would support a subpoena, the aide says.
https://newrepublic.com/article/198247/trump-epstein-fiasco-ron-wyden
It’s all coming into focus now!
Anonymous
07/23/2025 19:28
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So Musk called it: Trump was in the Epstein files. I guess he was in the meeting when Bondi told him.
Do you think he is the leaker? It has to be a close insider right?
Thought the leaker is Bongino.
Anonymous
07/23/2025 19:24
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kyle Griffin
Breaking: The House Oversight Committee has officially issued a subpoena to Ghislane Maxwell for a deposition scheduled to take place in federal prison on August 11.
So this means she has leverage over Trump and will use it while they are coordinating their obfuscation.
She is going to say nothing about trump. She wants a pardon or commutation of her time. Her lawyers have likely as already been in tough with the White House.
Like others have said, it doesn't matter if she exonerates him. If she gets a pardon, all hell is going to break lose in MAGA.
I'm sure he can bend their minds to believe whatever he wants them to believe. He'll probably say she was under Obama control.
He'll keep most of his MAGA moron support, but he has bleed some already. There are some who truly feel betrayed by him here.
He is going to lose every independent. It’s getting really weird and gross. Anyone with two brain cells and hasn’t been all the way brainwashed can see that this is a coverup.
Anonymous
07/23/2025 19:22
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
For those asking why didn't Biden/Dems do more, they did!
In February 2024—when Democrats controlled the Senate—Senator Wyden sought info on Epstein's finances from the Biden administration—and that he got access to it.
He actively moved to get the Senate to subpoena their release. Because Finance Committee rules require bipartisan support for subpoenas, Wyden sought the backing of several GOP senators on the committee, including now-chairman Mike Crapo and Marsha Blackburn. But none would support a subpoena, the aide says.
https://newrepublic.com/article/198247/trump-epstein-fiasco-ron-wyden
In February 2024—when Democrats controlled the Senate—Senator Wyden sought info on Epstein's finances from the Biden administration—and that he got access to it.
He actively moved to get the Senate to subpoena their release. Because Finance Committee rules require bipartisan support for subpoenas, Wyden sought the backing of several GOP senators on the committee, including now-chairman Mike Crapo and Marsha Blackburn. But none would support a subpoena, the aide says.
https://newrepublic.com/article/198247/trump-epstein-fiasco-ron-wyden
Anonymous
07/23/2025 19:21
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kyle Griffin
Breaking: The House Oversight Committee has officially issued a subpoena to Ghislane Maxwell for a deposition scheduled to take place in federal prison on August 11.
So this means she has leverage over Trump and will use it while they are coordinating their obfuscation.
She is going to say nothing about trump. She wants a pardon or commutation of her time. Her lawyers have likely as already been in tough with the White House.
Like others have said, it doesn't matter if she exonerates him. If she gets a pardon, all hell is going to break lose in MAGA.
I'm sure he can bend their minds to believe whatever he wants them to believe. He'll probably say she was under Obama control.
He'll keep most of his MAGA moron support, but he has bleed some already. There are some who truly feel betrayed by him here.
Anonymous
07/23/2025 19:18
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kyle Griffin
Breaking: The House Oversight Committee has officially issued a subpoena to Ghislane Maxwell for a deposition scheduled to take place in federal prison on August 11.
So this means she has leverage over Trump and will use it while they are coordinating their obfuscation.
She is going to say nothing about trump. She wants a pardon or commutation of her time. Her lawyers have likely as already been in tough with the White House.
Like others have said, it doesn't matter if she exonerates him. If she gets a pardon, all hell is going to break lose in MAGA.
I'm sure he can bend their minds to believe whatever he wants them to believe. He'll probably say she was under Obama control.
Anonymous
07/23/2025 19:10
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:So Musk called it: Trump was in the Epstein files. I guess he was in the meeting when Bondi told him.
Do you think he is the leaker? It has to be a close insider right?