Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirming Fanni pays in cash.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/20/politics/willis-wade-cash-payment-napa-valley-winery/index.html

This hardly proves that she repaid Wade in cash.

Her testimony that she carries and spends cash (and large amounts) while on vacation has been corroborated by a third party under oath. That counts for something. We will all see soon enough.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirming Fanni pays in cash.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/20/politics/willis-wade-cash-payment-napa-valley-winery/index.html

This hardly proves that she repaid Wade in cash.

It proves that she pays for expensive items in cash. This makes get cold n that she paid Wade in cash credible.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A DA knows a judge? Man, totally blew the lid off that one.

No, Judge McAfee WORKED directly under Fani for 4 years (out of 6 long years of legal experience out of law school) immediately before McAfee became a judge.

Oh, and Fani promoted him TWICE at the DA's office right before McAfee assumed bench.

This judge also donated to her campaign. So did his wife. Twice.

TRUMP is on trial folks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirming Fanni pays in cash.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/20/politics/willis-wade-cash-payment-napa-valley-winery/index.html

This hardly proves that she repaid Wade in cash.

Do you see any receipts that he was paid back via check or app? Her testimony, and his, was that she paid her way in cash.

Unless you have proof that disproves that, then you have nothing. IOW, the defendants who caused this side-show, have nothing.

Let's move on to the actual case, please.

That's the thing. There are no receipts.
Do her bank statements show withdrawals that would show she is stashing cash? Probably not. Because, her story is BS.
His bank statements don't show that cash was deposited. Curious, huh?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirming Fanni pays in cash.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/20/politics/willis-wade-cash-payment-napa-valley-winery/index.html

This hardly proves that she repaid Wade in cash.

Do you see any receipts that he was paid back via check or app? Her testimony, and his, was that she paid her way in cash.

Unless you have proof that disproves that, then you have nothing. IOW, the defendants who caused this side-show, have nothing.

Let's move on to the actual case, please.

Anonymous wrote:Confirming Fanni pays in cash.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/20/politics/willis-wade-cash-payment-napa-valley-winery/index.html

This hardly proves that she repaid Wade in cash.

People are overthinking this. This is nothing more than a delay tactic from Trump.

Confirming Fanni pays in cash.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/20/politics/willis-wade-cash-payment-napa-valley-winery/index.html

This is going to blow up spectacularly on Trump and co. Fani was very persuasive on the stand, and her testimony ( and her father’s testimony) regarding how this prosecution has impacted her safety was very moving.
That testimony will stick with future jurors when this eventually goes to trial.
The mudslinging sideshow might have been good fodder for conservative cable news, but I think it’s a mistake in the long run.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can’t wait to see the lawyers flounder trying to prove pointless crap for the rubes!

Right - Wade and Willis have been floundering.

Fanni has been doing quite well.

Anonymous wrote:Can’t wait to see the lawyers flounder trying to prove pointless crap for the rubes!

Right - Wade and Willis have been floundering.

Can’t wait to see the lawyers flounder trying to prove pointless crap for the rubes!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we are investigating Willis and ignoring the election fraud because one of the defendants has created this muck storm.

No. We will get to the election matter after the current lying/corruption allegation against DA/Special Prosecutor has been dealt with by the totally biased judge in this case.

It looks like the Hearing on Fani/Wade will resume on Tuesday of next week for additional testimony and summations/closings.

Who cares. I only need the hearing on Trump's attempt to steal the Georgia election to resume.

Be patient. We will resume the trial once the hearing on corruption and perjury allegations against Wade and Fani are resolved through the hearing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we are investigating Willis and ignoring the election fraud because one of the defendants has created this muck storm.

No. We will get to the election matter after the current lying/corruption allegation against DA/Special Prosecutor has been dealt with by the totally biased judge in this case.

It looks like the Hearing on Fani/Wade will resume on Tuesday of next week for additional testimony and summations/closings.

Who cares. I only need the hearing on Trump's attempt to steal the Georgia election to resume.