Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It takes less time to jump backwards than it does to unholster a weapon, aim, and shoot -- plus it means you are no longer in the path of what may now be an uncontrolled vehicle.
Shooting doesn't make sense as a defense.
He was panicked and acted within a split second.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It takes less time to jump backwards than it does to unholster a weapon, aim, and shoot -- plus it means you are no longer in the path of what may now be an uncontrolled vehicle.
Shooting doesn't make sense as a defense.
He was panicked and acted within a split second.
Anonymous wrote:
It takes less time to jump backwards than it does to unholster a weapon, aim, and shoot -- plus it means you are no longer in the path of what may now be an uncontrolled vehicle.
Shooting doesn't make sense as a defense.
Anonymous wrote:
It takes less time to jump backwards than it does to unholster a weapon, aim, and shoot -- plus it means you are no longer in the path of what may now be an uncontrolled vehicle.
Shooting doesn't make sense as a defense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the new video shows that the wife was trying to push all his buttons. She pissed him off enough that he reacted by shooting the victim. I see ZERO evidence that his life was in danger nor evidence that she was "weaponizing her vehicle", in fact it is now clearer that she was leaving the scene.
Just because the wife was mouthing off was NOT a reason to use deadly force.
It isn’t a justification but it shows how stupid and unhinged the people trying to obstruct ICE are.
I don’t think the shooting was justified, but WTF were they trying to accomplish exactly?
Who goes out and tries to antagonize and pick a fight with law enforcement trying to do their job? If I don’t like speeding enforcement should I follow state troopers around screaming at them, holding a cell phone in their face, and blowing whistles next to them all day?
The officers are doing what they are told. They can’t just decide not to do their job because you disagree with it. Of course they should try to stay cool… but they are also human and if you put them under enough pressure long someone will lose their cool.
There is no evidence the she was doing any of that, but generally, that would be an act of civil disobedience. The people assuming some risk to help right a wrong.
It doesn’t mean that you’ll get to murder someone, no matter how broken and pathetic you are.
It's stupid like running into a busy highway and illegal
Wait, are you talking about the cops illegally standing in the roadway now?
Amazing.
Yes, charge them with that too.
What's going to happen is the national guard will be deployed to protect ice from the lunatics it's clear miniapolis police aren't doing their job. I look forward to it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the new video shows that the wife was trying to push all his buttons. She pissed him off enough that he reacted by shooting the victim. I see ZERO evidence that his life was in danger nor evidence that she was "weaponizing her vehicle", in fact it is now clearer that she was leaving the scene.
Just because the wife was mouthing off was NOT a reason to use deadly force.
It isn’t a justification but it shows how stupid and unhinged the people trying to obstruct ICE are.
I don’t think the shooting was justified, but WTF were they trying to accomplish exactly?
Who goes out and tries to antagonize and pick a fight with law enforcement trying to do their job? If I don’t like speeding enforcement should I follow state troopers around screaming at them, holding a cell phone in their face, and blowing whistles next to them all day?
The officers are doing what they are told. They can’t just decide not to do their job because you disagree with it. Of course they should try to stay cool… but they are also human and if you put them under enough pressure long someone will lose their cool.
There is no evidence the she was doing any of that, but generally, that would be an act of civil disobedience. The people assuming some risk to help right a wrong.
It doesn’t mean that you’ll get to murder someone, no matter how broken and pathetic you are.
It's stupid like running into a busy highway and illegal
Wait, are you talking about the cops illegally standing in the roadway now?
Amazing.
Yes, charge them with that too.
What's going to happen is the national guard will be deployed to protect ice from the lunatics it's clear miniapolis police aren't doing their job. I look forward to it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the new video shows that the wife was trying to push all his buttons. She pissed him off enough that he reacted by shooting the victim. I see ZERO evidence that his life was in danger nor evidence that she was "weaponizing her vehicle", in fact it is now clearer that she was leaving the scene.
Just because the wife was mouthing off was NOT a reason to use deadly force.
It isn’t a justification but it shows how stupid and unhinged the people trying to obstruct ICE are.
I don’t think the shooting was justified, but WTF were they trying to accomplish exactly?
Who goes out and tries to antagonize and pick a fight with law enforcement trying to do their job? If I don’t like speeding enforcement should I follow state troopers around screaming at them, holding a cell phone in their face, and blowing whistles next to them all day?
The officers are doing what they are told. They can’t just decide not to do their job because you disagree with it. Of course they should try to stay cool… but they are also human and if you put them under enough pressure long someone will lose their cool.
There is no evidence the she was doing any of that, but generally, that would be an act of civil disobedience. The people assuming some risk to help right a wrong.
It doesn’t mean that you’ll get to murder someone, no matter how broken and pathetic you are.
You just want so badly to believe the worst about ICE/law enforcement. What he did was not murder. It was a mistake, and a mistake that could very justifiably cost him his job, but it wasn't murder.
Shooting into the driver's side window when the vehicle had already passed for the kill shots suggests otherwise.
Hate to have to ask but has it been reported which shot was fatal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I'm really impressed about how this panicked ICE officer who was fearing for his life as a vehicle was turning away from him managed to film it, pursue the vehicle, reach in, shoot the woman three times, and then call her a "f--king b---h" on the audio.
He sounds absolutely like a guy that's going to de-escalate a situation.
Ross is a weak person and I would be surprised if he didn’t engage in deeply immoral acts while in the military.
And how would you characterize a protester who uses her car to block in officers?
Anonymous wrote:The nation is too polarized to see that all of this is wrong. Every event turns into a psychotic tug of war using black and white thinking.
Anonymous wrote:
He was hostile towards her, because being that she did something so brazen as to try to block them in, he very justifiably viewed her as a threat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I'm really impressed about how this panicked ICE officer who was fearing for his life as a vehicle was turning away from him managed to film it, pursue the vehicle, reach in, shoot the woman three times, and then call her a "f--king b---h" on the audio.
He sounds absolutely like a guy that's going to de-escalate a situation.
Someone who uses their car to intentionally block in officers is commiting an incredibly brazen act and very rightfully would be viewed extreme caution. This isn't someone simply holding a sign and chanting. If I saw a protestor blocking in officers I would definitely think it's quite likely that such a person is inclined to act with violence.
She wasn’t blocking the street - the longer video which has been available for days shows multiple vehicles getting past her. And she said she was pulling out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the new video shows that the wife was trying to push all his buttons. She pissed him off enough that he reacted by shooting the victim. I see ZERO evidence that his life was in danger nor evidence that she was "weaponizing her vehicle", in fact it is now clearer that she was leaving the scene.
Just because the wife was mouthing off was NOT a reason to use deadly force.
It isn’t a justification but it shows how stupid and unhinged the people trying to obstruct ICE are.
I don’t think the shooting was justified, but WTF were they trying to accomplish exactly?
Who goes out and tries to antagonize and pick a fight with law enforcement trying to do their job? If I don’t like speeding enforcement should I follow state troopers around screaming at them, holding a cell phone in their face, and blowing whistles next to them all day?
The officers are doing what they are told. They can’t just decide not to do their job because you disagree with it. Of course they should try to stay cool… but they are also human and if you put them under enough pressure long someone will lose their cool.
There is no evidence the she was doing any of that, but generally, that would be an act of civil disobedience. The people assuming some risk to help right a wrong.
It doesn’t mean that you’ll get to murder someone, no matter how broken and pathetic you are.
You just want so badly to believe the worst about ICE/law enforcement. What he did was not murder. It was a mistake, and a mistake that could very justifiably cost him his job, but it wasn't murder.
Shooting into the driver's side window when the vehicle had already passed for the kill shots suggests otherwise.
Hate to have to ask but has it been reported which shot was fatal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the new video shows that the wife was trying to push all his buttons. She pissed him off enough that he reacted by shooting the victim. I see ZERO evidence that his life was in danger nor evidence that she was "weaponizing her vehicle", in fact it is now clearer that she was leaving the scene.
Just because the wife was mouthing off was NOT a reason to use deadly force.
It isn’t a justification but it shows how stupid and unhinged the people trying to obstruct ICE are.
I don’t think the shooting was justified, but WTF were they trying to accomplish exactly?
Who goes out and tries to antagonize and pick a fight with law enforcement trying to do their job? If I don’t like speeding enforcement should I follow state troopers around screaming at them, holding a cell phone in their face, and blowing whistles next to them all day?
The officers are doing what they are told. They can’t just decide not to do their job because you disagree with it. Of course they should try to stay cool… but they are also human and if you put them under enough pressure long someone will lose their cool.
There is no evidence the she was doing any of that, but generally, that would be an act of civil disobedience. The people assuming some risk to help right a wrong.
It doesn’t mean that you’ll get to murder someone, no matter how broken and pathetic you are.
It's stupid like running into a busy highway and illegal
Wait, are you talking about the cops illegally standing in the roadway now?
Amazing.
Yes, charge them with that too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I'm really impressed about how this panicked ICE officer who was fearing for his life as a vehicle was turning away from him managed to film it, pursue the vehicle, reach in, shoot the woman three times, and then call her a "f--king b---h" on the audio.
He sounds absolutely like a guy that's going to de-escalate a situation.
Someone who uses their car to intentionally block in officers is commiting an incredibly brazen act and very rightfully would be viewed extreme caution. This isn't someone simply holding a sign and chanting. If I saw a protestor blocking in officers I would definitely think it's quite likely that such a person is inclined to act with violence.
The officer didn’t seem very cautious[/quote]
He was hostile towards her, because being that she did something so brazen as to try to block them in, he very justifiably viewed her as a threat.